An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies Classroom

This study investigates the relation between review spacing and question format on student retention. Participants in an 8th grade Georgia Studies class reviewed previously learned material either in one sitting (massed review) or in multiple sessions (spaced review). Following the review, each part...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary Liming, Joshua Cuevas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georgia Southern University 2017-07-01
Series:Georgia Educational Researcher
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gerjournal/vol14/iss1/4
id doaj-6f77777e5be44049aeb05b4a354df95d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f77777e5be44049aeb05b4a354df95d2020-11-24T21:47:17ZengGeorgia Southern UniversityGeorgia Educational Researcher2471-00592017-07-0114110.20429/ger.2017.140104An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies ClassroomMary LimingJoshua CuevasThis study investigates the relation between review spacing and question format on student retention. Participants in an 8th grade Georgia Studies class reviewed previously learned material either in one sitting (massed review) or in multiple sessions (spaced review). Following the review, each participant answered questions either in multiple choice or short answer format. Subsequent to answering the questions, all students received feedback. One week following the completion of the reviews, students were given a post test. One month after the post test, students were given a final test. Pre-, post- and final tests were identical and no treatment occurred between the posttest and the final test. Correlational analyses of review spacing and question format suggest that spaced review is positively related to success on the posttest. There was no such finding related to massed review or question format on the posttest. Additionally, neither review spacing or question format had any correlational effect on the final test. Results suggest that spaced review is beneficial, but that the benefit is lost over time.https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gerjournal/vol14/iss1/4spacing effecttesting effectshort answermultiple choicemiddle grades
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mary Liming
Joshua Cuevas
spellingShingle Mary Liming
Joshua Cuevas
An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies Classroom
Georgia Educational Researcher
spacing effect
testing effect
short answer
multiple choice
middle grades
author_facet Mary Liming
Joshua Cuevas
author_sort Mary Liming
title An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies Classroom
title_short An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies Classroom
title_full An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies Classroom
title_fullStr An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies Classroom
title_full_unstemmed An Examination of the Testing and Spacing Effects in a Middle Grades Social Studies Classroom
title_sort examination of the testing and spacing effects in a middle grades social studies classroom
publisher Georgia Southern University
series Georgia Educational Researcher
issn 2471-0059
publishDate 2017-07-01
description This study investigates the relation between review spacing and question format on student retention. Participants in an 8th grade Georgia Studies class reviewed previously learned material either in one sitting (massed review) or in multiple sessions (spaced review). Following the review, each participant answered questions either in multiple choice or short answer format. Subsequent to answering the questions, all students received feedback. One week following the completion of the reviews, students were given a post test. One month after the post test, students were given a final test. Pre-, post- and final tests were identical and no treatment occurred between the posttest and the final test. Correlational analyses of review spacing and question format suggest that spaced review is positively related to success on the posttest. There was no such finding related to massed review or question format on the posttest. Additionally, neither review spacing or question format had any correlational effect on the final test. Results suggest that spaced review is beneficial, but that the benefit is lost over time.
topic spacing effect
testing effect
short answer
multiple choice
middle grades
url https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gerjournal/vol14/iss1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT maryliming anexaminationofthetestingandspacingeffectsinamiddlegradessocialstudiesclassroom
AT joshuacuevas anexaminationofthetestingandspacingeffectsinamiddlegradessocialstudiesclassroom
AT maryliming examinationofthetestingandspacingeffectsinamiddlegradessocialstudiesclassroom
AT joshuacuevas examinationofthetestingandspacingeffectsinamiddlegradessocialstudiesclassroom
_version_ 1725897984592314368