Convergent and discriminant validity of the ImPACT with traditional neuropsychological measures

• Main Authors: Robert J. Thoma, Julia A. Cook, Christopher McGrew, John H. King, Dalin T. Pulsipher, Ronald A. Yeo, Mollie A. Monnig, Andrew Mayer, Jessica Pommy, Richard A. Campbell
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-12-01
• Series: Cogent Psychology
• Subjects: head injury; traumatic brain injury; concussion; test construction
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1430199

Neuropsychological assessment of cognitive sequelae secondary to sports concussion is limited by lengthy administration times and lack of readily available neuropsychologists. Brief computerized test batteries are now under development to address this, but the validity of these measures is not yet established. The validity of one such computerized test battery, the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), was administered to 93 healthy NCAA Division I athletes, aged 18–24, along with a battery of traditional, well-described neuropsychological tests. Convergent and discriminant validity between the ImPACT and traditional measures was investigated using multitrait-multimethod matrix (MTMM) analysis. As an example, the ImPACT Visual Motor Speed composite demonstrated reasonably good convergent validity secondary to moderate correlations with traditional measures of processing speed, but it demonstrated relatively poor discriminant validity as it significantly correlated with the Reaction Time composite score. MTMM results were variable across ImPACT composites and data for each are presented. The ImPACT composite’s validity was further investigated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Six principal components were termed processing speed, visual memory, verbal memory, attention & working memory, and verbal fluency, based upon traditional test loadings, and a sixth loaded only on the ImPACT Reaction Time composite. EFA indicated content validity of moderate strength for the Visual Motor Speed and Visual Memory composites, but revealed problems with specificity for the other composites. Based upon the present findings, validity problems render the interpretability of the ImPACT composites somewhat questionable, and more research is necessary prior to using the ImPACT for assessment of clinical populations.