Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice

<p>The juridical concept of public contract was not generally accepted in the Romanian inter-war and communist doctrine. The needs of integration in the European structures after 1989, determined the domestic legislator to adapt the norms in order to accomplish the fundamental principles of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreea TABACU
Format: Article
Language:ron
Published: Babes-Bolyai University 2009-06-01
Series:Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/122
id doaj-6f39d93f65f84c26897784570772c149
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f39d93f65f84c26897784570772c1492021-08-09T08:54:36ZronBabes-Bolyai UniversityRevista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative1454-13782009-06-0111236788122Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publiceAndreea TABACU0Lector univ. dr., Facultatea de Ştiinţe Juridice şi Administrative, Universitatea din Piteşti<p>The juridical concept of public contract was not generally accepted in the Romanian inter-war and communist doctrine. The needs of integration in the European structures after 1989, determined the domestic legislator to adapt the norms in order to accomplish the fundamental principles of a democratic society. O.U.G. no 34/2006 transposes the European Council’s Directives in the field of the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, and defines the concept, the filing of the contract and the control proceedings before the National Council and the before the Courts. The fundamental principles of hearing the both sides is provided by the special law in the proceeding before the Council which is a central body, invested by jurisdictional power, which solves the cases filled by the applicant in the administrative procedure. This jurisdictional procedure, flexible and quick, has also shortcomings regarding the participation of the parties from the administrative procedure before the jurisdictional body and the consequences of the court’s decision for the person who awarded the contract. The possible solution is offered by the Law 554/2004 and the New Civil Procedure Code, which has to be adopted this year, and also by the jurisprudence, if the courts exert their active role.</p>https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/122public procurementadministrative contractscontroljurisdictioncivil procedure code.
collection DOAJ
language ron
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreea TABACU
spellingShingle Andreea TABACU
Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice
Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative
public procurement
administrative contracts
control
jurisdiction
civil procedure code.
author_facet Andreea TABACU
author_sort Andreea TABACU
title Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice
title_short Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice
title_full Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice
title_fullStr Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice
title_full_unstemmed Scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice
title_sort scurte considerații asupra contractului administrativ și asupra procedurilor de control jurisdicțional în materia achizițiilor publice
publisher Babes-Bolyai University
series Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative
issn 1454-1378
publishDate 2009-06-01
description <p>The juridical concept of public contract was not generally accepted in the Romanian inter-war and communist doctrine. The needs of integration in the European structures after 1989, determined the domestic legislator to adapt the norms in order to accomplish the fundamental principles of a democratic society. O.U.G. no 34/2006 transposes the European Council’s Directives in the field of the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, and defines the concept, the filing of the contract and the control proceedings before the National Council and the before the Courts. The fundamental principles of hearing the both sides is provided by the special law in the proceeding before the Council which is a central body, invested by jurisdictional power, which solves the cases filled by the applicant in the administrative procedure. This jurisdictional procedure, flexible and quick, has also shortcomings regarding the participation of the parties from the administrative procedure before the jurisdictional body and the consequences of the court’s decision for the person who awarded the contract. The possible solution is offered by the Law 554/2004 and the New Civil Procedure Code, which has to be adopted this year, and also by the jurisprudence, if the courts exert their active role.</p>
topic public procurement
administrative contracts
control
jurisdiction
civil procedure code.
url https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/122
work_keys_str_mv AT andreeatabacu scurteconsideratiiasupracontractuluiadministrativsiasupraprocedurilordecontroljurisdictionalinmateriaachizitiilorpublice
_version_ 1721214857680781312