Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения

In this paper, we have estimated the probability for default in large construction companies in Russia using the classic method for this purpose – logistic regression. Our task incorporates testing corporate governance factors and analyzing the predictive power of the model with regularization (Lass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexey Rybalka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Research University Higher School of Economics 2017-09-01
Series:Корпоративные финансы
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cfjournal.hse.ru/article/view/7212/8126
id doaj-6f2eeec660364d2c92de1210ceb264e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f2eeec660364d2c92de1210ceb264e42020-11-25T03:18:11ZengNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsКорпоративные финансы2073-04382017-09-01113799910.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.11.3.2017.79-99Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построенияAlexey Rybalka0graduate student, National Research University Higher School of Economics , Moscow, RussiaIn this paper, we have estimated the probability for default in large construction companies in Russia using the classic method for this purpose – logistic regression. Our task incorporates testing corporate governance factors and analyzing the predictive power of the model with regularization (Lasso and Ridge). For the dependent variable, we tested four definitions of default and then compared them. The model was conducted on the basis of information from the SPARK, Rosstat and the Bank of Russia database for the period of 2007-2015 – the final sample, after eliminating the outlying ob-servations, consists of 4761 construction companies. The added value of the corporate governance factors is verified on the basis of comparison of the ROC-curves (AUC) and the I and II errors. Seven hypotheses were formed, some of which were statistically significant, using an assessment based on both international and domestic experience dealing with the influence of corporate structure on the company's stability. In particular, everything else being equal, the default prob-ability of the company will be lower if the CEO is also a co-owner; whereas the default probability of the company will be higher if the company is a subsidiary. Note also, that, in fact, companies with a small board of directors overcome fi-nancial distress better (with a negative return on assets) in the Russian construction business. There was no confirmation of the hypothesis that older companies are less likely to default. Confirmed hypotheses give a new perspective to look at with a comprehensive risk assessment of large construction companies in the country. According to our estimates, corporate governance factors really improved the predictive ability of the models, and regularization methods confirmed the stability of these models. Using cross-validation, the robustness of the coefficients of the final specification was con-firmed. This result may be of interest to a greater extent for banks, commercial investors and partners-contractors.https://cfjournal.hse.ru/article/view/7212/8126probability of defaultcorporate governancelogit modelregularizationconstruction industryrussia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexey Rybalka
spellingShingle Alexey Rybalka
Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения
Корпоративные финансы
probability of default
corporate governance
logit model
regularization
construction industry
russia
author_facet Alexey Rybalka
author_sort Alexey Rybalka
title Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения
title_short Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения
title_full Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения
title_fullStr Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения
title_full_unstemmed Моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения
title_sort моделирование вероятности дефолта в строительном секторе: факторы корпоративного построения
publisher National Research University Higher School of Economics
series Корпоративные финансы
issn 2073-0438
publishDate 2017-09-01
description In this paper, we have estimated the probability for default in large construction companies in Russia using the classic method for this purpose – logistic regression. Our task incorporates testing corporate governance factors and analyzing the predictive power of the model with regularization (Lasso and Ridge). For the dependent variable, we tested four definitions of default and then compared them. The model was conducted on the basis of information from the SPARK, Rosstat and the Bank of Russia database for the period of 2007-2015 – the final sample, after eliminating the outlying ob-servations, consists of 4761 construction companies. The added value of the corporate governance factors is verified on the basis of comparison of the ROC-curves (AUC) and the I and II errors. Seven hypotheses were formed, some of which were statistically significant, using an assessment based on both international and domestic experience dealing with the influence of corporate structure on the company's stability. In particular, everything else being equal, the default prob-ability of the company will be lower if the CEO is also a co-owner; whereas the default probability of the company will be higher if the company is a subsidiary. Note also, that, in fact, companies with a small board of directors overcome fi-nancial distress better (with a negative return on assets) in the Russian construction business. There was no confirmation of the hypothesis that older companies are less likely to default. Confirmed hypotheses give a new perspective to look at with a comprehensive risk assessment of large construction companies in the country. According to our estimates, corporate governance factors really improved the predictive ability of the models, and regularization methods confirmed the stability of these models. Using cross-validation, the robustness of the coefficients of the final specification was con-firmed. This result may be of interest to a greater extent for banks, commercial investors and partners-contractors.
topic probability of default
corporate governance
logit model
regularization
construction industry
russia
url https://cfjournal.hse.ru/article/view/7212/8126
work_keys_str_mv AT alexeyrybalka modelirovanieveroâtnostidefoltavstroitelʹnomsektorefaktorykorporativnogopostroeniâ
_version_ 1724628348925116416