Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale

As opposed to geography which appears as a form of pure academic knowledge, the field of urbanism consists in practical knowledge supporting concrete action. The field of urban studies, which emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, is tangible proof that it is possible to take a critical distance from pract...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Franck Scherrer
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: ENS Éditions 2010-11-01
Series:Tracés
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/traces/4805
id doaj-6f03276bc287492da87fae9e06901fd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f03276bc287492da87fae9e06901fd02020-11-24T21:28:22ZfraENS ÉditionsTracés1763-00611963-18122010-11-0118719510.4000/traces.4805Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité socialeFranck ScherrerAs opposed to geography which appears as a form of pure academic knowledge, the field of urbanism consists in practical knowledge supporting concrete action. The field of urban studies, which emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, is tangible proof that it is possible to take a critical distance from practical action, although this field developed outside academia in France. However, the critical distance associated with political action continues to characterize urban studies. The current context is increasingly complex insofar as the objects under study are increasingly diverse, depending on the various cities which are analyzed.http://journals.openedition.org/traces/4805actionpublic contractsreferenceurban studiesurbanism
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Franck Scherrer
spellingShingle Franck Scherrer
Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale
Tracés
action
public contracts
reference
urban studies
urbanism
author_facet Franck Scherrer
author_sort Franck Scherrer
title Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale
title_short Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale
title_full Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale
title_fullStr Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale
title_full_unstemmed Le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale
title_sort le contrepoint des études urbaines et de l’urbanisme : ou comment se détacher de l’évidence de leur utilité sociale
publisher ENS Éditions
series Tracés
issn 1763-0061
1963-1812
publishDate 2010-11-01
description As opposed to geography which appears as a form of pure academic knowledge, the field of urbanism consists in practical knowledge supporting concrete action. The field of urban studies, which emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, is tangible proof that it is possible to take a critical distance from practical action, although this field developed outside academia in France. However, the critical distance associated with political action continues to characterize urban studies. The current context is increasingly complex insofar as the objects under study are increasingly diverse, depending on the various cities which are analyzed.
topic action
public contracts
reference
urban studies
urbanism
url http://journals.openedition.org/traces/4805
work_keys_str_mv AT franckscherrer lecontrepointdesetudesurbainesetdelurbanismeoucommentsedetacherdelevidencedeleurutilitesociale
_version_ 1725970884068376576