Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literature

Introduction: Bleeding from mucosal edges is known to decrease surgical visibility and increase the risk of complications in Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). A variety of strategies, including modifying anesthetic techniques have been proposed to create a bloodless field. A recent survey in anesthesi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thangavelautham Suhitharan, Selvaraj Sangeetha, Harikrishnan Kothandan, Dawen Yu Esther, Vui Kian Ho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-01-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111018491630112X
id doaj-6eef586b2fb447b0bb05bdbb17266cd6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6eef586b2fb447b0bb05bdbb17266cd62020-11-25T01:32:02ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEgyptian Journal of Anaesthesia1110-18492017-01-0133191410.1016/j.egja.2016.10.005Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literatureThangavelautham Suhitharan0Selvaraj Sangeetha1Harikrishnan Kothandan2Dawen Yu Esther3Vui Kian Ho4Department of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, SingaporeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, SingaporeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, SingaporeDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, SingaporeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, SingaporeIntroduction: Bleeding from mucosal edges is known to decrease surgical visibility and increase the risk of complications in Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). A variety of strategies, including modifying anesthetic techniques have been proposed to create a bloodless field. A recent survey in anesthesiologist revealed that a vast majority neither use controlled hypotension nor believe that modifying the anesthetic techniques will improve the outcome of ESS. This study investigates the different anesthetic techniques used for ESS and their effect on the haemodynamic variables achieved intra-operatively. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from an electronic anesthesia database on 233 consecutive adult patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery in a tertiary hospital in Singapore from January 2014 to August 2015 and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Results: Inhaled anesthetics (IA) were used for 93% (49% with morphine or fentanyl, 42% with remifentanil) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for 7% of the cases respectively. The airway was secured with endotracheal tube in 94.6% and the rest were having LMA. Average Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) lower than 70 mmHg was achieved in 74.4%. Antihypertensive drugs were used only in 5 cases (2.3%). Distribution of intra operative MAP and Heart rate (HR) were similar among different anesthetic techniques. Lowest MAP and HR achieved were significantly lower in IA with remifentanil use. Conclusion: Inhaled anesthesia is the preferred maintenance technique used for ESS. The desired MAP range was achieved in about 75% of the cases without needing anti hypertensives. Use of remifentanil reduces the MAP and HR further which might potentially improve the quality of surgical field and the outcome.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111018491630112XEndoscopic sinus surgeryControlled hypotensionAnesthetic techniqueRetrospective review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thangavelautham Suhitharan
Selvaraj Sangeetha
Harikrishnan Kothandan
Dawen Yu Esther
Vui Kian Ho
spellingShingle Thangavelautham Suhitharan
Selvaraj Sangeetha
Harikrishnan Kothandan
Dawen Yu Esther
Vui Kian Ho
Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literature
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Endoscopic sinus surgery
Controlled hypotension
Anesthetic technique
Retrospective review
author_facet Thangavelautham Suhitharan
Selvaraj Sangeetha
Harikrishnan Kothandan
Dawen Yu Esther
Vui Kian Ho
author_sort Thangavelautham Suhitharan
title Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literature
title_short Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literature
title_full Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literature
title_fullStr Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A retrospective analysis and review of literature
title_sort anesthetic techniques and haemodynamic control for endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective analysis and review of literature
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 1110-1849
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Introduction: Bleeding from mucosal edges is known to decrease surgical visibility and increase the risk of complications in Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). A variety of strategies, including modifying anesthetic techniques have been proposed to create a bloodless field. A recent survey in anesthesiologist revealed that a vast majority neither use controlled hypotension nor believe that modifying the anesthetic techniques will improve the outcome of ESS. This study investigates the different anesthetic techniques used for ESS and their effect on the haemodynamic variables achieved intra-operatively. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from an electronic anesthesia database on 233 consecutive adult patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery in a tertiary hospital in Singapore from January 2014 to August 2015 and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Results: Inhaled anesthetics (IA) were used for 93% (49% with morphine or fentanyl, 42% with remifentanil) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for 7% of the cases respectively. The airway was secured with endotracheal tube in 94.6% and the rest were having LMA. Average Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) lower than 70 mmHg was achieved in 74.4%. Antihypertensive drugs were used only in 5 cases (2.3%). Distribution of intra operative MAP and Heart rate (HR) were similar among different anesthetic techniques. Lowest MAP and HR achieved were significantly lower in IA with remifentanil use. Conclusion: Inhaled anesthesia is the preferred maintenance technique used for ESS. The desired MAP range was achieved in about 75% of the cases without needing anti hypertensives. Use of remifentanil reduces the MAP and HR further which might potentially improve the quality of surgical field and the outcome.
topic Endoscopic sinus surgery
Controlled hypotension
Anesthetic technique
Retrospective review
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111018491630112X
work_keys_str_mv AT thangavelauthamsuhitharan anesthetictechniquesandhaemodynamiccontrolforendoscopicsinussurgeryaretrospectiveanalysisandreviewofliterature
AT selvarajsangeetha anesthetictechniquesandhaemodynamiccontrolforendoscopicsinussurgeryaretrospectiveanalysisandreviewofliterature
AT harikrishnankothandan anesthetictechniquesandhaemodynamiccontrolforendoscopicsinussurgeryaretrospectiveanalysisandreviewofliterature
AT dawenyuesther anesthetictechniquesandhaemodynamiccontrolforendoscopicsinussurgeryaretrospectiveanalysisandreviewofliterature
AT vuikianho anesthetictechniquesandhaemodynamiccontrolforendoscopicsinussurgeryaretrospectiveanalysisandreviewofliterature
_version_ 1725083636542210048