Agreement of screening tools with established questionnaires used in psychological assessment of bariatric patients

• Main Authors: Henry Yuen Foong Lew, Kelly Ann Zainal
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-12-01
• Series: Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105818766960
• ISSN: 2010-1058; 2059-2329

Background: Depression and binge eating contributes to less weight loss after bariatric surgery. The lack of standardized assessment of depression and binge eating in bariatric patients makes it hard to identify and provide treatment to relevant patients. This study aimed to enhance the accuracy of identifying binge eating and depression in bariatric patients before surgery. We determined the agreement of brief screening tools for depression, binge eating and quality of life with established questionnaires used in psychological assessment of bariatric patients. Methods: In total, 120 patients completed both screening tools and established questionnaires before surgery during their psychological assessment sessions. Cohen’s kappa was conducted to determine whether Patient Health Questionnaire-2 agreed with the Beck Depression Inventory II in identifying depression; and if Patient Health Questionnaire-Binge agreed with the Binge Eating Scale in identifying binge eating. To investigate the degree of agreeableness between the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and Moorehead–Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II on quality of life, Bland Altman analysis was performed. Results: Our results show that agreement between Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and Beck Depression Inventory II ( k =0.35) was fair. We found that agreement between Patient Health Questionnaire-Binge and Binge Eating Scale ( k =0.41) was moderate. Conclusions: These results indicate that the respective brief instruments’ identification of depression and binge eating is comparable to established questionnaires. Our results play a role in offering brief screening tools to be included at different points of assessment, together with established questionnaires and clinical interviews for a more accurate and comprehensive assessment.