Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration
The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinča Institute o...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2011/1451-39941103271S.pdf |
id |
doaj-6ed3b14a891940d1921d73357d61c1f8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6ed3b14a891940d1921d73357d61c1f82020-11-24T23:40:03ZengVINCA Institute of Nuclear SciencesNuclear Technology and Radiation Protection1451-39942011-01-0126327127410.2298/NTRP1103271SCalibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibrationŠećerov Bojana Lj.Bačić Goran G.The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences we compared two recommended protocols of irradiation procedures in the calibration of dosimetry systems in radiation processing: (1) by irradiation of routine dosimeters (ethanol-chlorobenzene - ECB) at the calibration laboratory and (2), by in-plant calibration with alanine transfer - dosimeters. The critical point for in-plant calibration is irradiation geometry, so we carefully positioned the phantom carrying both dosimeters in order to minimize dose gradients across the sample. The analysis of results obtained showed that the difference among determined absorbed doses for the construction of calibration curves between these two methods, (alanine vs. ECB), is less than 1%. The difference in combined standard uncertainty for each calibration procedure is 0.1%. These results demonstrate that our in-plant calibration is as good as calibration by irradiation at the calibration laboratory and validates our placement of the irradiation phantom during irradiation.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2011/1451-39941103271S.pdfradiation processingcobalt-60dosimetryin-plant calibration |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Šećerov Bojana Lj. Bačić Goran G. |
spellingShingle |
Šećerov Bojana Lj. Bačić Goran G. Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection radiation processing cobalt-60 dosimetry in-plant calibration |
author_facet |
Šećerov Bojana Lj. Bačić Goran G. |
author_sort |
Šećerov Bojana Lj. |
title |
Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration |
title_short |
Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration |
title_full |
Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration |
title_fullStr |
Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration |
title_sort |
calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: validation procedure for in-plant calibration |
publisher |
VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences |
series |
Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection |
issn |
1451-3994 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences we compared two recommended protocols of irradiation procedures in the calibration of dosimetry systems in radiation processing: (1) by irradiation of routine dosimeters (ethanol-chlorobenzene - ECB) at the calibration laboratory and (2), by in-plant calibration with alanine transfer - dosimeters. The critical point for in-plant calibration is irradiation geometry, so we carefully positioned the phantom carrying both dosimeters in order to minimize dose gradients across the sample. The analysis of results obtained showed that the difference among determined absorbed doses for the construction of calibration curves between these two methods, (alanine vs. ECB), is less than 1%. The difference in combined standard uncertainty for each calibration procedure is 0.1%. These results demonstrate that our in-plant calibration is as good as calibration by irradiation at the calibration laboratory and validates our placement of the irradiation phantom during irradiation. |
topic |
radiation processing cobalt-60 dosimetry in-plant calibration |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2011/1451-39941103271S.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT secerovbojanalj calibrationofroutinedosimetersinradiationprocessingvalidationprocedureforinplantcalibration AT bacicgorang calibrationofroutinedosimetersinradiationprocessingvalidationprocedureforinplantcalibration |
_version_ |
1725511289467305984 |