Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration

The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinča Institute o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Šećerov Bojana Lj., Bačić Goran G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences 2011-01-01
Series:Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2011/1451-39941103271S.pdf
id doaj-6ed3b14a891940d1921d73357d61c1f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ed3b14a891940d1921d73357d61c1f82020-11-24T23:40:03ZengVINCA Institute of Nuclear SciencesNuclear Technology and Radiation Protection1451-39942011-01-0126327127410.2298/NTRP1103271SCalibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibrationŠećerov Bojana Lj.Bačić Goran G.The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences we compared two recommended protocols of irradiation procedures in the calibration of dosimetry systems in radiation processing: (1) by irradiation of routine dosimeters (ethanol-chlorobenzene - ECB) at the calibration laboratory and (2), by in-plant calibration with alanine transfer - dosimeters. The critical point for in-plant calibration is irradiation geometry, so we carefully positioned the phantom carrying both dosimeters in order to minimize dose gradients across the sample. The analysis of results obtained showed that the difference among determined absorbed doses for the construction of calibration curves between these two methods, (alanine vs. ECB), is less than 1%. The difference in combined standard uncertainty for each calibration procedure is 0.1%. These results demonstrate that our in-plant calibration is as good as calibration by irradiation at the calibration laboratory and validates our placement of the irradiation phantom during irradiation.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2011/1451-39941103271S.pdfradiation processingcobalt-60dosimetryin-plant calibration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Šećerov Bojana Lj.
Bačić Goran G.
spellingShingle Šećerov Bojana Lj.
Bačić Goran G.
Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration
Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
radiation processing
cobalt-60
dosimetry
in-plant calibration
author_facet Šećerov Bojana Lj.
Bačić Goran G.
author_sort Šećerov Bojana Lj.
title Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration
title_short Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration
title_full Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration
title_fullStr Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration
title_full_unstemmed Calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: Validation procedure for in-plant calibration
title_sort calibration of routine dosimeters in radiation processing: validation procedure for in-plant calibration
publisher VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences
series Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
issn 1451-3994
publishDate 2011-01-01
description The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences we compared two recommended protocols of irradiation procedures in the calibration of dosimetry systems in radiation processing: (1) by irradiation of routine dosimeters (ethanol-chlorobenzene - ECB) at the calibration laboratory and (2), by in-plant calibration with alanine transfer - dosimeters. The critical point for in-plant calibration is irradiation geometry, so we carefully positioned the phantom carrying both dosimeters in order to minimize dose gradients across the sample. The analysis of results obtained showed that the difference among determined absorbed doses for the construction of calibration curves between these two methods, (alanine vs. ECB), is less than 1%. The difference in combined standard uncertainty for each calibration procedure is 0.1%. These results demonstrate that our in-plant calibration is as good as calibration by irradiation at the calibration laboratory and validates our placement of the irradiation phantom during irradiation.
topic radiation processing
cobalt-60
dosimetry
in-plant calibration
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1451-3994/2011/1451-39941103271S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT secerovbojanalj calibrationofroutinedosimetersinradiationprocessingvalidationprocedureforinplantcalibration
AT bacicgorang calibrationofroutinedosimetersinradiationprocessingvalidationprocedureforinplantcalibration
_version_ 1725511289467305984