The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis

Object: Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LCM) represents a state of systemic malignant disease with poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) between intraventricular chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir (OR) and chemotherapy through lumbar puncture (LP) in LCM.Pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariano Montes de Oca Delgado, Bernardo Cacho Díaz, José Santos Zambrano, Vicente Guerrero Juárez, Manuel Salvador López Martínez, Elvira Castro Martínez, Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla, Sonia Mejía Pérez, Ignacio Reyes Moreno, Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves, Alberto González Aguilar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2018.00509/full
id doaj-6eceada74693485cb89ca53a7dc844c0
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariano Montes de Oca Delgado
Bernardo Cacho Díaz
José Santos Zambrano
Vicente Guerrero Juárez
Manuel Salvador López Martínez
Elvira Castro Martínez
Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
Sonia Mejía Pérez
Sonia Mejía Pérez
Ignacio Reyes Moreno
Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
spellingShingle Mariano Montes de Oca Delgado
Bernardo Cacho Díaz
José Santos Zambrano
Vicente Guerrero Juárez
Manuel Salvador López Martínez
Elvira Castro Martínez
Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
Sonia Mejía Pérez
Sonia Mejía Pérez
Ignacio Reyes Moreno
Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
Frontiers in Oncology
leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
overall survival
chemotherapy
ommaya reservoir
lumbar puncture
karnofsky performance status
author_facet Mariano Montes de Oca Delgado
Bernardo Cacho Díaz
José Santos Zambrano
Vicente Guerrero Juárez
Manuel Salvador López Martínez
Elvira Castro Martínez
Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
Sonia Mejía Pérez
Sonia Mejía Pérez
Ignacio Reyes Moreno
Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
Alberto González Aguilar
author_sort Mariano Montes de Oca Delgado
title The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
title_short The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
title_full The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
title_fullStr The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
title_full_unstemmed The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis
title_sort comparative treatment of intraventricular chemotherapy by ommaya reservoir vs. lumbar puncture in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Object: Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LCM) represents a state of systemic malignant disease with poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) between intraventricular chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir (OR) and chemotherapy through lumbar puncture (LP) in LCM.Patients and Methods: Forty adult patients with LCM were included. All patients underwent lumbar puncture and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty patients received chemotherapy through LP and 10 undergone colocation of Ommaya reservoir for intraventricular chemotherapy.Results: The most common symptom was headache (Present in 50%). The cranial nerves most affected were VI and VII. Leptomeningeal enhancement was the most frequent finding in MRI. The OS in the LP group was 4 months and Ommaya group was 9.2 months (p = 0.0006; CI:1.8-3), with statistical differences in favor to Intraventricular treatment. Proportional hazard regression showed that receiving chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir was a protective factor (Hazard ratio = 0.258, Standard Error = 0.112, p = 0.002 and 95% CI 0.110-0.606). Using KPS as a factor did not affect the hazard ratio of Ommaya reservoir itself.Conclusions: OS was significantly higher in patients with Ommaya reservoir in spite of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) previous to chemotherapy. Therefore, intraventricular chemotherapy should be preferred over lumbar puncture chemotherapy administration if there are resources available.
topic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis
overall survival
chemotherapy
ommaya reservoir
lumbar puncture
karnofsky performance status
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2018.00509/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marianomontesdeocadelgado thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT bernardocachodiaz thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT josesantoszambrano thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT vicenteguerrerojuarez thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT manuelsalvadorlopezmartinez thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT elviracastromartinez thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT javieravendanomendezpadilla thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT javieravendanomendezpadilla thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT soniamejiaperez thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT soniamejiaperez thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT ignacioreyesmoreno thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT axayacatlgutierrezaceves thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT axayacatlgutierrezaceves thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar thecomparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT marianomontesdeocadelgado comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT bernardocachodiaz comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT josesantoszambrano comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT vicenteguerrerojuarez comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT manuelsalvadorlopezmartinez comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT elviracastromartinez comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT javieravendanomendezpadilla comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT javieravendanomendezpadilla comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT soniamejiaperez comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT soniamejiaperez comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT ignacioreyesmoreno comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT axayacatlgutierrezaceves comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT axayacatlgutierrezaceves comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
AT albertogonzalezaguilar comparativetreatmentofintraventricularchemotherapybyommayareservoirvslumbarpunctureinpatientswithleptomeningealcarcinomatosis
_version_ 1725355524683202560
spelling doaj-6eceada74693485cb89ca53a7dc844c02020-11-25T00:23:41ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2018-11-01810.3389/fonc.2018.00509415682The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal CarcinomatosisMariano Montes de Oca Delgado0Bernardo Cacho Díaz1José Santos Zambrano2Vicente Guerrero Juárez3Manuel Salvador López Martínez4Elvira Castro Martínez5Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla6Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla7Sonia Mejía Pérez8Sonia Mejía Pérez9Ignacio Reyes Moreno10Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves11Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves12Alberto González Aguilar13Alberto González Aguilar14Alberto González Aguilar15Alberto González Aguilar16Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeuroscience Unit, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, MexicoEmergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoEmergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoEmergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoEmergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, MexicoNeurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, MexicoRadioneurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoEmergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery “Manuel Velasco Suárez” (INNN), Mexico City, MexicoNeurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, MexicoObject: Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LCM) represents a state of systemic malignant disease with poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) between intraventricular chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir (OR) and chemotherapy through lumbar puncture (LP) in LCM.Patients and Methods: Forty adult patients with LCM were included. All patients underwent lumbar puncture and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty patients received chemotherapy through LP and 10 undergone colocation of Ommaya reservoir for intraventricular chemotherapy.Results: The most common symptom was headache (Present in 50%). The cranial nerves most affected were VI and VII. Leptomeningeal enhancement was the most frequent finding in MRI. The OS in the LP group was 4 months and Ommaya group was 9.2 months (p = 0.0006; CI:1.8-3), with statistical differences in favor to Intraventricular treatment. Proportional hazard regression showed that receiving chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir was a protective factor (Hazard ratio = 0.258, Standard Error = 0.112, p = 0.002 and 95% CI 0.110-0.606). Using KPS as a factor did not affect the hazard ratio of Ommaya reservoir itself.Conclusions: OS was significantly higher in patients with Ommaya reservoir in spite of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) previous to chemotherapy. Therefore, intraventricular chemotherapy should be preferred over lumbar puncture chemotherapy administration if there are resources available.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2018.00509/fullleptomeningeal carcinomatosisoverall survivalchemotherapyommaya reservoirlumbar puncturekarnofsky performance status