Child’s right to be Heard in Chilean Family Courts: Confidential Hearing

This work addresses the views family court judges have on The Right of Children to be heard (0-14 years) and the importance they give this as one of the components of the Best Interests of the Child. This qualitative study is framed into the empirical Legal Sociology. To this effect, semi structured...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Salum Alvarado, Sara Salum Alvarado, Ricardo Saavedra Alvarado
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad Nacional, Costa Rica 2016-04-01
Series:Revista Latinoamericana de Derechos Humanos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/derechoshumanos/article/view/8022/9049
Description
Summary:This work addresses the views family court judges have on The Right of Children to be heard (0-14 years) and the importance they give this as one of the components of the Best Interests of the Child. This qualitative study is framed into the empirical Legal Sociology. To this effect, semi structured interviews to Family Court Judges were applied, focusing on Family Courts processes, specifically in the Confidential Hearing Audience. We argue that there would be a misalignment between the legislation which aims to give life to the Convention on the Rights of the Child’s guiding principles and Family Courts, specifically, on how this legislation plans on implementing the right to be heard.
ISSN:1659-4304
2215-4221