The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of Consciousnes
With reference to Schelling’s Philosophy of Mythology (PoM) in my paper I will address three points, namely: To what extent Schelling’s PoM provides us with arguments in favour of 1. Realism, 2. Emergentism and 3. Documentality (Ferraris 2009). Accordingly, in the first section, Reality, I will pres...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Rivista di Estetica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/7073 |
id |
doaj-6ec4c7dc625a40be9e496ca47246f941 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6ec4c7dc625a40be9e496ca47246f9412021-04-08T14:58:30ZengRosenberg & SellierRivista di Estetica0035-62122421-58642020-08-01749110510.4000/estetica.7073The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of ConsciousnesMatteo Vincenzo d’AlfonsoWith reference to Schelling’s Philosophy of Mythology (PoM) in my paper I will address three points, namely: To what extent Schelling’s PoM provides us with arguments in favour of 1. Realism, 2. Emergentism and 3. Documentality (Ferraris 2009). Accordingly, in the first section, Reality, I will present Schelling’s PoM as realism, arguing that in mythology Schelling finds the traces of the developing of consciousness, regarded as a real fact. But, as this latter can only be real if having a history, i.e. if emerging from a previous natural status, which is devoid of any consciousness, PoM should be regarded as strongly related with a sort of emergentism. This will thus be the object of the second section, where I will investigate the genetic interpretation of Schelling’s Weltalter proposed by Wolfram Hogrebe (Hogrebe 1989) and suggest that precisely this analysis of the Weltalter explains also why Schelling’s project couldn’t but fail. In fact, against its intention, the Weltalter, as it was trying to explain the rise of semantics together with it the true genesis of the our acknowledgment of the world, still remains affected by an idealistic stance and hence couldn’t succeed in becoming positive philosophy. Eventually, in the third section of this paper, Documentality, I argue, that a solution of the problems left open by Schelling’s Weltalter and positively addressed in the PoM is offered by the interpretation of this latter as a contribution to Documentality. Even if created before and apparently independently from the act writing, in fact mythology relies on the possibility of recording tales, hence it is made of and eventually ends up in a written corpus. This means that the consciousness mythology gives us an account of, is the one that for the first time is able to present itself in narrated tales. It is not the mere possibility of acknowledging something, but in fact the possibility of binding our will to a freely formulated law trough our memory, i.e. the birth of conscience upon consciousness, which is the real sense of religion. In this sense Ferraris’ concept of documentality provides us an important theoretical framework to understand the hidden presuppositions of Schelling’s PoM and to relate this latter to its realistic and emergentistic character.http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/7073DocumentalityPhilosophy of MythologyConscience |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matteo Vincenzo d’Alfonso |
spellingShingle |
Matteo Vincenzo d’Alfonso The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of Consciousnes Rivista di Estetica Documentality Philosophy of Mythology Conscience |
author_facet |
Matteo Vincenzo d’Alfonso |
author_sort |
Matteo Vincenzo d’Alfonso |
title |
The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of Consciousnes |
title_short |
The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of Consciousnes |
title_full |
The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of Consciousnes |
title_fullStr |
The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of Consciousnes |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Consciousness of the Real and the Reality of Consciousnes |
title_sort |
consciousness of the real and the reality of consciousnes |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
series |
Rivista di Estetica |
issn |
0035-6212 2421-5864 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
With reference to Schelling’s Philosophy of Mythology (PoM) in my paper I will address three points, namely: To what extent Schelling’s PoM provides us with arguments in favour of 1. Realism, 2. Emergentism and 3. Documentality (Ferraris 2009). Accordingly, in the first section, Reality, I will present Schelling’s PoM as realism, arguing that in mythology Schelling finds the traces of the developing of consciousness, regarded as a real fact. But, as this latter can only be real if having a history, i.e. if emerging from a previous natural status, which is devoid of any consciousness, PoM should be regarded as strongly related with a sort of emergentism. This will thus be the object of the second section, where I will investigate the genetic interpretation of Schelling’s Weltalter proposed by Wolfram Hogrebe (Hogrebe 1989) and suggest that precisely this analysis of the Weltalter explains also why Schelling’s project couldn’t but fail. In fact, against its intention, the Weltalter, as it was trying to explain the rise of semantics together with it the true genesis of the our acknowledgment of the world, still remains affected by an idealistic stance and hence couldn’t succeed in becoming positive philosophy. Eventually, in the third section of this paper, Documentality, I argue, that a solution of the problems left open by Schelling’s Weltalter and positively addressed in the PoM is offered by the interpretation of this latter as a contribution to Documentality. Even if created before and apparently independently from the act writing, in fact mythology relies on the possibility of recording tales, hence it is made of and eventually ends up in a written corpus. This means that the consciousness mythology gives us an account of, is the one that for the first time is able to present itself in narrated tales. It is not the mere possibility of acknowledging something, but in fact the possibility of binding our will to a freely formulated law trough our memory, i.e. the birth of conscience upon consciousness, which is the real sense of religion. In this sense Ferraris’ concept of documentality provides us an important theoretical framework to understand the hidden presuppositions of Schelling’s PoM and to relate this latter to its realistic and emergentistic character. |
topic |
Documentality Philosophy of Mythology Conscience |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/estetica/7073 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matteovincenzodalfonso theconsciousnessoftherealandtherealityofconsciousnes AT matteovincenzodalfonso consciousnessoftherealandtherealityofconsciousnes |
_version_ |
1721534799485599744 |