Participation, for Whom? The Potential of Gamified Participatory Artefacts in Uncovering Power Relations within Urban Renewal Projects

• Main Authors: Teodora Iulia Constantinescu, Oswald Devisch, Liesbeth Huybrechts
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
• Series: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
• Subjects: gamified participatory artefacts; scenario games; mental images; knowledge; action; consciousness
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/9/5/319

When<b> </b>defining participation in urban renewal projects in a political sense, this concept implies the challenging of power relations in each of its dimensions while addressing the need for <i>knowledge, action</i> and <i>consciousness</i>. <i>Knowledge</i> is defined as a resource which affects observable decision making. <i>Action</i> looks at who is involved in the production of such knowledge in order to challenge and shape the political agenda. <i>Consciousness </i>is how the production of knowledge changes the awareness or worldview of those involved, thus shaping the psychological and conceptual boundaries of what is possible. This paper addresses these politics of participation via the use of gamification, and more particularly gamified participatory artefacts. We discuss how a ‘good’ participatory planning process implies rebalancing existing power relations via the redistribution of <i>knowledge, consciousness</i> and <i>actions, </i>and aims to operationalize this ambition through a game. We particularly focus on the urban renewal process of one particular case, namely the Vennestraat—one of the main commercial streets of the city of Genk (BE) and present a three year participatory mapping process that made use of three gamified participatory artefacts (i.e., socio-economic network mapping, gathering mental images and scenario games). After uncovering the complex field of power relations in the entrepreneurial street, we analyze the different types of relations/groups that emerge from this participatory mapping process. The paper concludes with an analytical framework that employs gamified participatory artefacts in order to map and understand power relations and the mechanisms that frame them.