Images of orbitals in twentieth-century General Chemistry textbooks: a semiotic analysis
This paper aims at investigating how the images of orbitals were presented in undergraduate General Chemistry textbooks throughout the twentieth century. Special attention was given to ontological and epistemological aspects related to such images. Images of orbitals from twenty-six textbooks use...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Investigações em Ensino de Ciências |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.if.ufrgs.br/ienci/artigos/Artigo_ID389/v20_n1_a2015.pdf |
Summary: | This paper aims at investigating how the images of orbitals were presented in undergraduate
General Chemistry textbooks throughout the twentieth century. Special attention was given to
ontological and epistemological aspects related to such images. Images of orbitals from twenty-six
textbooks used in Brazilian universities were analyzed according to Peircean semiotics, in order to
assess: the nature of the orbital; what is the relation between representation and the represented
object; what aspects of the object are highlighted by means of the representation; what are the limits
and potentialities of the representation. It is observed that the images of orbitals in the textbooks are
generally described as representations of maximum probability density and identified as limit
surfaces. Such images present orbitals as possessing well defined sizes, shapes and directional
nature. There is not sufficient information in most textbooks on the meaning of such images,
especially regarding: the object of which representation takes place; how the images were produced;
what aspects of the object the representation highlight; and what are the similarities and differences
between the several images related to an orbital. Teaching difficulties arising from the features
discussed here may be overcome by means of explicit discussion on the production, use and
meaning of the representations, supported by Peircean semiotics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1518-8795 1518-8795 |