Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse
In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to lever...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UACES
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Contemporary European Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1090 |
id |
doaj-6ea65807b071489683227b29bbd0b79f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6ea65807b071489683227b29bbd0b79f2021-02-02T11:53:51ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2020-12-0116310.30950/jcer.v16i3.1090Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional DiscourseAndreas AmerkampPaul Jeffrey Stephenson In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to leverage €315 billion of investment in the European economy. The EFSI legislative process was very fast with legislation emerging in just a year, with the first EFSI regulation appearing in mid-2015. Using policy frame analysis, this article zooms in on the discursive patterns of the European Commission, European Parliament and Council, expecting to find transport infrastructure a key theme given the low investment levels in this sector after the financial crisis in 2008. Analysing key documents at two periods in time, and drawing on interviews with officials, it explores the arguments used to make the case for EFSI and how these changes over time, leading to the extension of EFSI through an amended regulation in December 2017. In so doing, it shows the strategic positions of the institutions during Agenda-setting for EFSI. Moreover, he article explores questions of legitimacy and accountability. It reveals how key events including the Paris Agreement on climate change (December 2015) and Brexit referendum (June 2016) increased the persuasiveness of its framing. https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1090Framing analysisEuropean Fund for Strategic InvestmentTransport infrastructureTrans-European NetworksInfrastructure investmentEuropean Structural and Investment Fund |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andreas Amerkamp Paul Jeffrey Stephenson |
spellingShingle |
Andreas Amerkamp Paul Jeffrey Stephenson Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse Journal of Contemporary European Research Framing analysis European Fund for Strategic Investment Transport infrastructure Trans-European Networks Infrastructure investment European Structural and Investment Fund |
author_facet |
Andreas Amerkamp Paul Jeffrey Stephenson |
author_sort |
Andreas Amerkamp |
title |
Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse |
title_short |
Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse |
title_full |
Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse |
title_fullStr |
Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse |
title_full_unstemmed |
Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse |
title_sort |
framing the european fund for strategic investments: a comparative analysis of the eu's institutional discourse |
publisher |
UACES |
series |
Journal of Contemporary European Research |
issn |
1815-347X |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to leverage €315 billion of investment in the European economy. The EFSI legislative process was very fast with legislation emerging in just a year, with the first EFSI regulation appearing in mid-2015. Using policy frame analysis, this article zooms in on the discursive patterns of the European Commission, European Parliament and Council, expecting to find transport infrastructure a key theme given the low investment levels in this sector after the financial crisis in 2008. Analysing key documents at two periods in time, and drawing on interviews with officials, it explores the arguments used to make the case for EFSI and how these changes over time, leading to the extension of EFSI through an amended regulation in December 2017. In so doing, it shows the strategic positions of the institutions during Agenda-setting for EFSI. Moreover, he article explores questions of legitimacy and accountability. It reveals how key events including the Paris Agreement on climate change (December 2015) and Brexit referendum (June 2016) increased the persuasiveness of its framing.
|
topic |
Framing analysis European Fund for Strategic Investment Transport infrastructure Trans-European Networks Infrastructure investment European Structural and Investment Fund |
url |
https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1090 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreasamerkamp framingtheeuropeanfundforstrategicinvestmentsacomparativeanalysisoftheeusinstitutionaldiscourse AT pauljeffreystephenson framingtheeuropeanfundforstrategicinvestmentsacomparativeanalysisoftheeusinstitutionaldiscourse |
_version_ |
1724294707087933440 |