Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse

In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to lever...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Amerkamp, Paul Jeffrey Stephenson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UACES 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary European Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1090
id doaj-6ea65807b071489683227b29bbd0b79f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ea65807b071489683227b29bbd0b79f2021-02-02T11:53:51ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2020-12-0116310.30950/jcer.v16i3.1090Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional DiscourseAndreas AmerkampPaul Jeffrey Stephenson In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to leverage €315 billion of investment in the European economy. The EFSI legislative process was very fast with legislation emerging in just a year, with the first EFSI regulation appearing in mid-2015. Using policy frame analysis, this article zooms in on the discursive patterns of the European Commission, European Parliament and Council, expecting to find transport infrastructure a key theme given the low investment levels in this sector after the financial crisis in 2008. Analysing key documents at two periods in time, and drawing on interviews with officials, it explores the arguments used to make the case for EFSI and how these changes over time, leading to the extension of EFSI through an amended regulation in December 2017. In so doing, it shows the strategic positions of the institutions during Agenda-setting for EFSI. Moreover, he article explores questions of legitimacy and accountability. It reveals how key events including the Paris Agreement on climate change (December 2015) and Brexit referendum (June 2016) increased the persuasiveness of its framing. https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1090Framing analysisEuropean Fund for Strategic InvestmentTransport infrastructureTrans-European NetworksInfrastructure investmentEuropean Structural and Investment Fund
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Amerkamp
Paul Jeffrey Stephenson
spellingShingle Andreas Amerkamp
Paul Jeffrey Stephenson
Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse
Journal of Contemporary European Research
Framing analysis
European Fund for Strategic Investment
Transport infrastructure
Trans-European Networks
Infrastructure investment
European Structural and Investment Fund
author_facet Andreas Amerkamp
Paul Jeffrey Stephenson
author_sort Andreas Amerkamp
title Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse
title_short Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse
title_full Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse
title_fullStr Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse
title_full_unstemmed Framing the European Fund for Strategic Investments: A Comparative Analysis of the EU's Institutional Discourse
title_sort framing the european fund for strategic investments: a comparative analysis of the eu's institutional discourse
publisher UACES
series Journal of Contemporary European Research
issn 1815-347X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description In 2014, newly elected Commission President Juncker pushed to create the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), the aim of creating jobs and stimulating growth. With guarantees offered by the fund and the involvement of the European Investment Bank, the plan was to use €21 billion to leverage €315 billion of investment in the European economy. The EFSI legislative process was very fast with legislation emerging in just a year, with the first EFSI regulation appearing in mid-2015. Using policy frame analysis, this article zooms in on the discursive patterns of the European Commission, European Parliament and Council, expecting to find transport infrastructure a key theme given the low investment levels in this sector after the financial crisis in 2008. Analysing key documents at two periods in time, and drawing on interviews with officials, it explores the arguments used to make the case for EFSI and how these changes over time, leading to the extension of EFSI through an amended regulation in December 2017. In so doing, it shows the strategic positions of the institutions during Agenda-setting for EFSI. Moreover, he article explores questions of legitimacy and accountability. It reveals how key events including the Paris Agreement on climate change (December 2015) and Brexit referendum (June 2016) increased the persuasiveness of its framing.
topic Framing analysis
European Fund for Strategic Investment
Transport infrastructure
Trans-European Networks
Infrastructure investment
European Structural and Investment Fund
url https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1090
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasamerkamp framingtheeuropeanfundforstrategicinvestmentsacomparativeanalysisoftheeusinstitutionaldiscourse
AT pauljeffreystephenson framingtheeuropeanfundforstrategicinvestmentsacomparativeanalysisoftheeusinstitutionaldiscourse
_version_ 1724294707087933440