What is literature for? The role of transformative reading
The question of what literature is for—if there is a purpose—is not new. Since the beginning of literary theory as a field of study, the debate has been long and complex and is still ongoing. This article offers a reflection on the concept of purpose in the development of literary theories up to the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Cogent Arts & Humanities |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1692532 |
id |
doaj-6e924e1451654497a770106eb6398023 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6e924e1451654497a770106eb63980232021-02-09T09:49:46ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Arts & Humanities2331-19832019-01-016110.1080/23311983.2019.16925321692532What is literature for? The role of transformative readingOlivia Fialho0University of Oslo, Utrecht UniversityThe question of what literature is for—if there is a purpose—is not new. Since the beginning of literary theory as a field of study, the debate has been long and complex and is still ongoing. This article offers a reflection on the concept of purpose in the development of literary theories up to the advent of the cognitive turn in the twenty-first century, when empirical studies of literary reading began to proliferate. The paper argues that discussions on the question of purpose have changed from no purpose to pragmatic and later to more existential purposes. It places transformative reading in the center of this debate and reflects on the results of the series of empirical studies conducted so far. The paper focuses on the implications and uses of transformative reading in social contexts. It concludes by discussing how empirical work in this area suggests new conceptual distinctions that could contribute to theorizing about purpose in literary studies more generally. It also indicates what lies ahead in terms of challenges while pointing at new research directions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1692532transformative readingliterary experiencecognitionreader responseempirical studyliterature education |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olivia Fialho |
spellingShingle |
Olivia Fialho What is literature for? The role of transformative reading Cogent Arts & Humanities transformative reading literary experience cognition reader response empirical study literature education |
author_facet |
Olivia Fialho |
author_sort |
Olivia Fialho |
title |
What is literature for? The role of transformative reading |
title_short |
What is literature for? The role of transformative reading |
title_full |
What is literature for? The role of transformative reading |
title_fullStr |
What is literature for? The role of transformative reading |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is literature for? The role of transformative reading |
title_sort |
what is literature for? the role of transformative reading |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Cogent Arts & Humanities |
issn |
2331-1983 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The question of what literature is for—if there is a purpose—is not new. Since the beginning of literary theory as a field of study, the debate has been long and complex and is still ongoing. This article offers a reflection on the concept of purpose in the development of literary theories up to the advent of the cognitive turn in the twenty-first century, when empirical studies of literary reading began to proliferate. The paper argues that discussions on the question of purpose have changed from no purpose to pragmatic and later to more existential purposes. It places transformative reading in the center of this debate and reflects on the results of the series of empirical studies conducted so far. The paper focuses on the implications and uses of transformative reading in social contexts. It concludes by discussing how empirical work in this area suggests new conceptual distinctions that could contribute to theorizing about purpose in literary studies more generally. It also indicates what lies ahead in terms of challenges while pointing at new research directions. |
topic |
transformative reading literary experience cognition reader response empirical study literature education |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1692532 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT oliviafialho whatisliteraturefortheroleoftransformativereading |
_version_ |
1724277256266711040 |