Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis
Interhuman relations sometimes suffer from a lack of adequate recognition. Here I ask whether this can be caused by the “third” of representations of a superhuman ultimate object or source of recognition, that is, a personal God. In arguing for a positive answer, I articulate a notion of mediational...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Social Ontology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0008 |
id |
doaj-6e850dcecdac41f99ec5a8870cebbb00 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6e850dcecdac41f99ec5a8870cebbb002021-09-06T19:40:53ZengDe GruyterJournal of Social Ontology2196-96552196-96632020-02-015214716810.1515/jso-2019-0008Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic AnalysisKoskinen Heikki J.0Independent scholar, Helsinki, FinlandInterhuman relations sometimes suffer from a lack of adequate recognition. Here I ask whether this can be caused by the “third” of representations of a superhuman ultimate object or source of recognition, that is, a personal God. In arguing for a positive answer, I articulate a notion of mediational recognition, and present a systematic analysis of a trilateral form of recognition in which one party claims to mediate normative judgements of another party to a third one. The analysis then focuses on the structure of metaphysical power that can be generated by religious groups and institutions.https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0008recognitionmediational recognitionmetaphysical powerreligious identitysocial pathologycontemporary recognition theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Koskinen Heikki J. |
spellingShingle |
Koskinen Heikki J. Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis Journal of Social Ontology recognition mediational recognition metaphysical power religious identity social pathology contemporary recognition theory |
author_facet |
Koskinen Heikki J. |
author_sort |
Koskinen Heikki J. |
title |
Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis |
title_short |
Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis |
title_full |
Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mediational Recognition and Metaphysical Power: A Systematic Analysis |
title_sort |
mediational recognition and metaphysical power: a systematic analysis |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Journal of Social Ontology |
issn |
2196-9655 2196-9663 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Interhuman relations sometimes suffer from a lack of adequate recognition. Here I ask whether this can be caused by the “third” of representations of a superhuman ultimate object or source of recognition, that is, a personal God. In arguing for a positive answer, I articulate a notion of mediational recognition, and present a systematic analysis of a trilateral form of recognition in which one party claims to mediate normative judgements of another party to a third one. The analysis then focuses on the structure of metaphysical power that can be generated by religious groups and institutions. |
topic |
recognition mediational recognition metaphysical power religious identity social pathology contemporary recognition theory |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2019-0008 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT koskinenheikkij mediationalrecognitionandmetaphysicalpowerasystematicanalysis |
_version_ |
1717767582992302080 |