Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike Sharing

In this work, we investigate a new paradigm for dock-less bike sharing. Recently, it has become essential to accommodate connected and free-floating bicycles in modern bike-sharing operations. This change comes with an increase in the coordination cost, as bicycles are no longer checked in and out f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Rahim Taleqani, Chrysafis Vogiatzis, Jill Hough
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Transportation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1275851
id doaj-6e60a9bf55f94155849546cf4260e2bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e60a9bf55f94155849546cf4260e2bc2020-11-25T02:36:42ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Advanced Transportation0197-67292042-31952020-01-01202010.1155/2020/12758511275851Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike SharingAli Rahim Taleqani0Chrysafis Vogiatzis1Jill Hough2North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USAUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USANorth Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USAIn this work, we investigate a new paradigm for dock-less bike sharing. Recently, it has become essential to accommodate connected and free-floating bicycles in modern bike-sharing operations. This change comes with an increase in the coordination cost, as bicycles are no longer checked in and out from bike-sharing stations that are fully equipped to handle the volume of requests; instead, bicycles can be checked in and out from virtually anywhere. In this paper, we propose a new framework for combining traditional bike stations with locations that can serve as free-floating bike-sharing stations. The framework we propose here focuses on identifying highly centralized k-clubs (i.e., connected subgraphs of restricted diameter). The restricted diameter reduces coordination costs as dock-less bicycles can only be found in specific locations. In addition, we use closeness centrality as this metric allows for quick access to dock-less bike sharing while, at the same time, optimizing the reach of service to bikers/customers. For the proposed problem, we first derive its computational complexity and show that it is NP-hard (by reduction from the 3-SATISFIABILITY problem), and then provide an integer programming formulation. Due to its computational complexity, the problem cannot be solved exactly in a large-scale setting, as is such of an urban area. Hence, we provide a greedy heuristic approach that is shown to run in reasonable computational time. We also provide the presentation and analysis of a case study in two cities of the state of North Dakota: Casselton and Fargo. Our work concludes with the cost-benefit analysis of both models (docked vs. dockless) to suggest the potential advantages of the proposed model.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1275851
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Rahim Taleqani
Chrysafis Vogiatzis
Jill Hough
spellingShingle Ali Rahim Taleqani
Chrysafis Vogiatzis
Jill Hough
Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike Sharing
Journal of Advanced Transportation
author_facet Ali Rahim Taleqani
Chrysafis Vogiatzis
Jill Hough
author_sort Ali Rahim Taleqani
title Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike Sharing
title_short Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike Sharing
title_full Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike Sharing
title_fullStr Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike Sharing
title_full_unstemmed Maximum Closeness Centrality k-Clubs: A Study of Dock-Less Bike Sharing
title_sort maximum closeness centrality k-clubs: a study of dock-less bike sharing
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Journal of Advanced Transportation
issn 0197-6729
2042-3195
publishDate 2020-01-01
description In this work, we investigate a new paradigm for dock-less bike sharing. Recently, it has become essential to accommodate connected and free-floating bicycles in modern bike-sharing operations. This change comes with an increase in the coordination cost, as bicycles are no longer checked in and out from bike-sharing stations that are fully equipped to handle the volume of requests; instead, bicycles can be checked in and out from virtually anywhere. In this paper, we propose a new framework for combining traditional bike stations with locations that can serve as free-floating bike-sharing stations. The framework we propose here focuses on identifying highly centralized k-clubs (i.e., connected subgraphs of restricted diameter). The restricted diameter reduces coordination costs as dock-less bicycles can only be found in specific locations. In addition, we use closeness centrality as this metric allows for quick access to dock-less bike sharing while, at the same time, optimizing the reach of service to bikers/customers. For the proposed problem, we first derive its computational complexity and show that it is NP-hard (by reduction from the 3-SATISFIABILITY problem), and then provide an integer programming formulation. Due to its computational complexity, the problem cannot be solved exactly in a large-scale setting, as is such of an urban area. Hence, we provide a greedy heuristic approach that is shown to run in reasonable computational time. We also provide the presentation and analysis of a case study in two cities of the state of North Dakota: Casselton and Fargo. Our work concludes with the cost-benefit analysis of both models (docked vs. dockless) to suggest the potential advantages of the proposed model.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1275851
work_keys_str_mv AT alirahimtaleqani maximumclosenesscentralitykclubsastudyofdocklessbikesharing
AT chrysafisvogiatzis maximumclosenesscentralitykclubsastudyofdocklessbikesharing
AT jillhough maximumclosenesscentralitykclubsastudyofdocklessbikesharing
_version_ 1715436198104662016