Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) is an evolving technique with potential advantages by reducing number of incisions that can reduce port-related complications and improve cosmetic results. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes between SILC, hand-a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thawatchai Akaraviputh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mahidol University 2016-04-01
Series:Siriraj Medical Journal
Online Access:https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/55193
id doaj-6e56f75dc3884acd9e51c44bb48bf04b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e56f75dc3884acd9e51c44bb48bf04b2021-08-13T09:52:51ZengMahidol UniversitySiriraj Medical Journal2228-80822016-04-01682Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative StudyThawatchai Akaraviputh0Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700 Background: Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) is an evolving technique with potential advantages by reducing number of incisions that can reduce port-related complications and improve cosmetic results. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes between SILC, hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) and standard multi-port laparoscopic colectomy (MLC). Methods: Retrospective analyses of a total of 90 patients between May 2010 and December 2011, who underwent SILC for colon cancer surgery, were performed in 30 patients. Clinicopathological parameters were matched 1:1 with patients who underwent HALC (n=30) and MLC (n=30). Short-term outcomes were collected and analyzed.      Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in SILC compared to HALC and MLC (p< 0.001), as well as less estimated blood loss (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in conversion rate and number of harvested lymph nodes. SILC had the advantage of less 24-hr postoperative pain score compared to HALC and MLC (p< 0.001), whereas length of stay and time to full diet were not different.    Conclusion: In selected patients, SILC can be successfully and safely performed with shorter operative time, less estimated blood loss and less postoperative pain score.  Keywords: Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy, single-port laparoscopic colectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy, laparoscopic colectomy, colon cancer  https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/55193
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thawatchai Akaraviputh
spellingShingle Thawatchai Akaraviputh
Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study
Siriraj Medical Journal
author_facet Thawatchai Akaraviputh
author_sort Thawatchai Akaraviputh
title Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study
title_short Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study
title_full Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study
title_fullStr Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Case-Matched Comparative Study
title_sort outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a case-matched comparative study
publisher Mahidol University
series Siriraj Medical Journal
issn 2228-8082
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Background: Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) is an evolving technique with potential advantages by reducing number of incisions that can reduce port-related complications and improve cosmetic results. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes between SILC, hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) and standard multi-port laparoscopic colectomy (MLC). Methods: Retrospective analyses of a total of 90 patients between May 2010 and December 2011, who underwent SILC for colon cancer surgery, were performed in 30 patients. Clinicopathological parameters were matched 1:1 with patients who underwent HALC (n=30) and MLC (n=30). Short-term outcomes were collected and analyzed.      Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in SILC compared to HALC and MLC (p< 0.001), as well as less estimated blood loss (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in conversion rate and number of harvested lymph nodes. SILC had the advantage of less 24-hr postoperative pain score compared to HALC and MLC (p< 0.001), whereas length of stay and time to full diet were not different.    Conclusion: In selected patients, SILC can be successfully and safely performed with shorter operative time, less estimated blood loss and less postoperative pain score.  Keywords: Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy, single-port laparoscopic colectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy, laparoscopic colectomy, colon cancer 
url https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/55193
work_keys_str_mv AT thawatchaiakaraviputh outcomesofsingleincisionlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncanceracasematchedcomparativestudy
_version_ 1721208752622796800