Comparative analysis of objective techniques for criteria weighing in two MCDM methods on example of an air conditioner selection

This paper deals with comparative analysis of two different types of objective techniques for criteria weighing: Entropy and CRITIC and two MCDM methods: MOORA and SAW on example of an air conditioner selection. We used six variants for calculation of normalized performance ratings. Results showed t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vujičić Momčilo D., Papić Miloš Z., Blagojević Marija D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Savez inženjera i tehničara Srbije 2017-01-01
Series:Tehnika
Subjects:
SAW
Online Access:http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0040-2176/2017/0040-21761703422V.pdf
Description
Summary:This paper deals with comparative analysis of two different types of objective techniques for criteria weighing: Entropy and CRITIC and two MCDM methods: MOORA and SAW on example of an air conditioner selection. We used six variants for calculation of normalized performance ratings. Results showed that the decision of the best air conditioner was basically independent of the MCDM method used, despite the applied technique for determination of criteria weights. Complete ranking within all of the combinations of methods and techniques with diverse ratio calculation variants showed that the best ranked air conditioner was A7, while the worst ones were A5 and A9. Significant positive correlation was obtained for almost all the pairs of variants in all the combinations except for the MOORA - CRITIC combination with SAW - Entropy combination to have the highest correlations between variants (p < 0.01).
ISSN:0040-2176
2560-3086