Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review
Abstract There were 89 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 76 original research papers, 4 reviews, 5 technical notes, 1 guideline, and 3 corrections. The volume was down slightly from 2017 with a corresponding 15% decrease in manuscript su...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0594-8 |
id |
doaj-6e451b8c485349e498765589b04cc67a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6e451b8c485349e498765589b04cc67a2021-01-03T12:18:21ZengBMCJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance1532-429X2019-12-0121112410.1186/s12968-019-0594-8Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in reviewWarren J. Manning0Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical SchoolAbstract There were 89 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 76 original research papers, 4 reviews, 5 technical notes, 1 guideline, and 3 corrections. The volume was down slightly from 2017 with a corresponding 15% decrease in manuscript submissions from 405 to 346 and thus reflects a slight increase in the acceptance rate from 25 to 26%. The decrease in submissions for the year followed the initiation of the increased author processing charge (APC) for Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) members for manuscripts submitted after June 30, 2018. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2018 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2019) was slightly lower at 5.1 (vs. 5.46 for 2017; as published in June 2018. The 2018 impact factor means that on average, each JCMR published in 2016 and 2017 was cited 5.1 times in 2018. Our 5 year impact factor was 5.82. In accordance with Open-Access publishing guidelines of BMC, the JCMR articles are published on-line in a continuus fashion in the chronologic order of acceptance, with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful for the JCMR audience to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or themes, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and contemporaneous JCMR publications. In this publication, the manuscripts are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought within the journal. In addition, as in the past two years, I have used this publication to also convey information regarding the editorial process and as a “State of our JCMR.” This is the 12th year of JCMR as an open-access publication with BMC (formerly known as Biomed Central). The timing of the JCMR transition to the open access platform was “ahead of the curve” and a tribute to the vision of Dr. Matthias Friedrich, the SCMR Publications Committee Chair and Dr. Dudley Pennell, the JCMR editor-in-chief at the time. The open-access system has dramatically increased the reading and citation of JCMR publications and I hope that you, our authors, will continue to send your very best, high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. It takes a village to run a journal and I thank our very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, Reviewers for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner. These efforts have allowed the JCMR to continue as the premier journal of our field. This entire process would also not be possible without the dedication and efforts of our managing editor, Diana Gethers. Finally, I thank you for entrusting me with the editorship of the JCMR as I begin my 4th year as your editor-in-chief. It has been a tremendous experience for me and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field remains a great joy and highlight of my week!https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0594-8Cardiovascular magnetic resonanceReviewEditorial processImaging |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Warren J. Manning |
spellingShingle |
Warren J. Manning Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Cardiovascular magnetic resonance Review Editorial process Imaging |
author_facet |
Warren J. Manning |
author_sort |
Warren J. Manning |
title |
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review |
title_short |
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review |
title_full |
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review |
title_fullStr |
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review |
title_sort |
journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 2017/2018 in review |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
issn |
1532-429X |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
Abstract There were 89 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 76 original research papers, 4 reviews, 5 technical notes, 1 guideline, and 3 corrections. The volume was down slightly from 2017 with a corresponding 15% decrease in manuscript submissions from 405 to 346 and thus reflects a slight increase in the acceptance rate from 25 to 26%. The decrease in submissions for the year followed the initiation of the increased author processing charge (APC) for Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) members for manuscripts submitted after June 30, 2018. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2018 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2019) was slightly lower at 5.1 (vs. 5.46 for 2017; as published in June 2018. The 2018 impact factor means that on average, each JCMR published in 2016 and 2017 was cited 5.1 times in 2018. Our 5 year impact factor was 5.82. In accordance with Open-Access publishing guidelines of BMC, the JCMR articles are published on-line in a continuus fashion in the chronologic order of acceptance, with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful for the JCMR audience to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or themes, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and contemporaneous JCMR publications. In this publication, the manuscripts are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought within the journal. In addition, as in the past two years, I have used this publication to also convey information regarding the editorial process and as a “State of our JCMR.” This is the 12th year of JCMR as an open-access publication with BMC (formerly known as Biomed Central). The timing of the JCMR transition to the open access platform was “ahead of the curve” and a tribute to the vision of Dr. Matthias Friedrich, the SCMR Publications Committee Chair and Dr. Dudley Pennell, the JCMR editor-in-chief at the time. The open-access system has dramatically increased the reading and citation of JCMR publications and I hope that you, our authors, will continue to send your very best, high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. It takes a village to run a journal and I thank our very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, Reviewers for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner. These efforts have allowed the JCMR to continue as the premier journal of our field. This entire process would also not be possible without the dedication and efforts of our managing editor, Diana Gethers. Finally, I thank you for entrusting me with the editorship of the JCMR as I begin my 4th year as your editor-in-chief. It has been a tremendous experience for me and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field remains a great joy and highlight of my week! |
topic |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance Review Editorial process Imaging |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0594-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT warrenjmanning journalofcardiovascularmagneticresonance20172018inreview |
_version_ |
1724350463513460736 |