Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BackgroundThe thoracic spine is critical for athletic kinetic chain functioning yet widely overlooked in terms of specific evidenced-based exercise prescription. Thoracic mobility, motor control and strength are required to optimise performance in sport and minimise excessive load/stress on other co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isaak Tyros, Nicola R Heneghan, Svein M Lokhaug, Sigurd Longvastøl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-01
Series:BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Online Access:https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000713.full
id doaj-6e407ae00361455a81d8f6c91078c76a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e407ae00361455a81d8f6c91078c76a2021-07-29T14:00:40ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine2055-76472020-04-016110.1136/bmjsem-2019-000713Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesisIsaak Tyros0Nicola R Heneghan1Svein M Lokhaug2Sigurd Longvastøl33 Edgbaston Physiotherapy Clinic, Birmingham, UK 2 Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Centre of Precision Rehabiliation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UKMolde Performance Center AS, Molde, NorwayBackgroundThe thoracic spine is critical for athletic kinetic chain functioning yet widely overlooked in terms of specific evidenced-based exercise prescription. Thoracic mobility, motor control and strength are required to optimise performance in sport and minimise excessive load/stress on other components of the kinetic chain.ObjectiveTo identify and evaluate mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength thoracic exercises for use in athletes.DesignSystematic review involving expert reviewers at key stages: searches and screening (n=1), eligibility, evaluation, data extraction and evaluation (n=3). Key databases and social media sources were searched to 16 August 2019. Eligible exercises were thoracic exercises to promote mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength. A narrative synthesis enabled an outcome-based classification of exercises, with level of evidence of individual sources informing overall level of evidence for each outcome (Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine).ResultsFrom 2348 sources (social media, database searches and other sources), 38 exercises were included. Sources included images, video clips and written descriptions of exercises. Exercises targeting all planes of motion were evaluated and classified according to outcome. Exercises comprised functional and non-functional exercises for mobility (n=9), work capacity (n=15), motor control (n=7) and strength (n=7). Overall level of evidence for each outcome was level 5.ConclusionThis synthesis and evaluation of exercises has captured the scope of thoracic exercises used in ‘practice’. Evaluation against an expert-derived outcome-based classification provides practitioners with a framework to facilitate exercise prescription. Evaluation of validity and effectiveness of exercises on outcomes is now required.https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000713.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Isaak Tyros
Nicola R Heneghan
Svein M Lokhaug
Sigurd Longvastøl
spellingShingle Isaak Tyros
Nicola R Heneghan
Svein M Lokhaug
Sigurd Longvastøl
Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
author_facet Isaak Tyros
Nicola R Heneghan
Svein M Lokhaug
Sigurd Longvastøl
author_sort Isaak Tyros
title Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_short Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_sort clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
issn 2055-7647
publishDate 2020-04-01
description BackgroundThe thoracic spine is critical for athletic kinetic chain functioning yet widely overlooked in terms of specific evidenced-based exercise prescription. Thoracic mobility, motor control and strength are required to optimise performance in sport and minimise excessive load/stress on other components of the kinetic chain.ObjectiveTo identify and evaluate mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength thoracic exercises for use in athletes.DesignSystematic review involving expert reviewers at key stages: searches and screening (n=1), eligibility, evaluation, data extraction and evaluation (n=3). Key databases and social media sources were searched to 16 August 2019. Eligible exercises were thoracic exercises to promote mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength. A narrative synthesis enabled an outcome-based classification of exercises, with level of evidence of individual sources informing overall level of evidence for each outcome (Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine).ResultsFrom 2348 sources (social media, database searches and other sources), 38 exercises were included. Sources included images, video clips and written descriptions of exercises. Exercises targeting all planes of motion were evaluated and classified according to outcome. Exercises comprised functional and non-functional exercises for mobility (n=9), work capacity (n=15), motor control (n=7) and strength (n=7). Overall level of evidence for each outcome was level 5.ConclusionThis synthesis and evaluation of exercises has captured the scope of thoracic exercises used in ‘practice’. Evaluation against an expert-derived outcome-based classification provides practitioners with a framework to facilitate exercise prescription. Evaluation of validity and effectiveness of exercises on outcomes is now required.
url https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/6/1/e000713.full
work_keys_str_mv AT isaaktyros clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT nicolarheneghan clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT sveinmlokhaug clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT sigurdlongvastøl clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
_version_ 1721248713316237312