Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers
The current study investigated the expression of disagreement by Iranian advanced English learners. The data for the study comprised the recorded discussions of 26 male and female interlocutors in three different settings: 1) language institute, 2) home environment, and 3) university setting. Analys...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Isfahan
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Applied Research on English Language |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15480_bab544147334d2cd54dafb8f7203c35a.pdf |
id |
doaj-6e2e6c9f63f44578aa4e7ac6bddefe59 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6e2e6c9f63f44578aa4e7ac6bddefe592020-11-24T22:39:46ZengUniversity of IsfahanApplied Research on English Language2252-01982322-53432014-01-01358710015480Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakersFatemeh Pourmohamadi0Afsaneh Abaszadeh1Reza Ghafar Samar2Tarbiat Modares UniversityTarbiat Modares UniversityTarbiat Modares UniversityThe current study investigated the expression of disagreement by Iranian advanced English learners. The data for the study comprised the recorded discussions of 26 male and female interlocutors in three different settings: 1) language institute, 2) home environment, and 3) university setting. Analysis of the arguments pointed to the influence of contextual factors. More precisely, disagreements were found to be complex and multidirectional speech acts and thus various factors, including the interlocutorsâ power, relationships, background, and the situational context, influence their realization as face-threatening or face-enhancing speech acts. Therefore, the linguistic markers cannot safely categorize disagreement turns into polite/impolite or preferred/dispreferred acts.http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15480_bab544147334d2cd54dafb8f7203c35a.pdfArgumentDisagreementPoliteness strategiesSpeech actsConversation analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fatemeh Pourmohamadi Afsaneh Abaszadeh Reza Ghafar Samar |
spellingShingle |
Fatemeh Pourmohamadi Afsaneh Abaszadeh Reza Ghafar Samar Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers Applied Research on English Language Argument Disagreement Politeness strategies Speech acts Conversation analysis |
author_facet |
Fatemeh Pourmohamadi Afsaneh Abaszadeh Reza Ghafar Samar |
author_sort |
Fatemeh Pourmohamadi |
title |
Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers |
title_short |
Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers |
title_full |
Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers |
title_fullStr |
Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers |
title_sort |
investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: a case of iranian l2 speakers |
publisher |
University of Isfahan |
series |
Applied Research on English Language |
issn |
2252-0198 2322-5343 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
The current study investigated the expression of disagreement by Iranian advanced English learners. The data for the study comprised the recorded discussions of 26 male and female interlocutors in three different settings: 1) language institute, 2) home environment, and 3) university setting. Analysis of the arguments pointed to the influence of contextual factors. More precisely, disagreements were found to be complex and multidirectional speech acts and thus various factors, including the interlocutorsâ power, relationships, background, and the situational context, influence their realization as face-threatening or face-enhancing speech acts. Therefore, the linguistic markers cannot safely categorize disagreement turns into polite/impolite or preferred/dispreferred acts. |
topic |
Argument Disagreement Politeness strategies Speech acts Conversation analysis |
url |
http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15480_bab544147334d2cd54dafb8f7203c35a.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fatemehpourmohamadi investigatingdisagreementsthroughacontextspecificapproachacaseofiranianl2speakers AT afsanehabaszadeh investigatingdisagreementsthroughacontextspecificapproachacaseofiranianl2speakers AT rezaghafarsamar investigatingdisagreementsthroughacontextspecificapproachacaseofiranianl2speakers |
_version_ |
1725707784040742912 |