Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers

The current study investigated the expression of disagreement by Iranian advanced English learners. The data for the study comprised the recorded discussions of 26 male and female interlocutors in three different settings: 1) language institute, 2) home environment, and 3) university setting. Analys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Pourmohamadi, Afsaneh Abaszadeh, Reza Ghafar Samar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Isfahan 2014-01-01
Series:Applied Research on English Language
Subjects:
Online Access:http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15480_bab544147334d2cd54dafb8f7203c35a.pdf
id doaj-6e2e6c9f63f44578aa4e7ac6bddefe59
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e2e6c9f63f44578aa4e7ac6bddefe592020-11-24T22:39:46ZengUniversity of IsfahanApplied Research on English Language2252-01982322-53432014-01-01358710015480Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakersFatemeh Pourmohamadi0Afsaneh Abaszadeh1Reza Ghafar Samar2Tarbiat Modares UniversityTarbiat Modares UniversityTarbiat Modares UniversityThe current study investigated the expression of disagreement by Iranian advanced English learners. The data for the study comprised the recorded discussions of 26 male and female interlocutors in three different settings: 1) language institute, 2) home environment, and 3) university setting. Analysis of the arguments pointed to the influence of contextual factors. More precisely, disagreements were found to be complex and multidirectional speech acts and thus various factors, including the interlocutorsâ power, relationships, background, and the situational context, influence their realization as face-threatening or face-enhancing speech acts. Therefore, the linguistic markers cannot safely categorize disagreement turns into polite/impolite or preferred/dispreferred acts.http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15480_bab544147334d2cd54dafb8f7203c35a.pdfArgumentDisagreementPoliteness strategiesSpeech actsConversation analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fatemeh Pourmohamadi
Afsaneh Abaszadeh
Reza Ghafar Samar
spellingShingle Fatemeh Pourmohamadi
Afsaneh Abaszadeh
Reza Ghafar Samar
Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers
Applied Research on English Language
Argument
Disagreement
Politeness strategies
Speech acts
Conversation analysis
author_facet Fatemeh Pourmohamadi
Afsaneh Abaszadeh
Reza Ghafar Samar
author_sort Fatemeh Pourmohamadi
title Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers
title_short Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers
title_full Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers
title_fullStr Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers
title_full_unstemmed Investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: A case of Iranian L2 speakers
title_sort investigating disagreements through a context-specific approach: a case of iranian l2 speakers
publisher University of Isfahan
series Applied Research on English Language
issn 2252-0198
2322-5343
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The current study investigated the expression of disagreement by Iranian advanced English learners. The data for the study comprised the recorded discussions of 26 male and female interlocutors in three different settings: 1) language institute, 2) home environment, and 3) university setting. Analysis of the arguments pointed to the influence of contextual factors. More precisely, disagreements were found to be complex and multidirectional speech acts and thus various factors, including the interlocutorsâ power, relationships, background, and the situational context, influence their realization as face-threatening or face-enhancing speech acts. Therefore, the linguistic markers cannot safely categorize disagreement turns into polite/impolite or preferred/dispreferred acts.
topic Argument
Disagreement
Politeness strategies
Speech acts
Conversation analysis
url http://are.ui.ac.ir/article_15480_bab544147334d2cd54dafb8f7203c35a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehpourmohamadi investigatingdisagreementsthroughacontextspecificapproachacaseofiranianl2speakers
AT afsanehabaszadeh investigatingdisagreementsthroughacontextspecificapproachacaseofiranianl2speakers
AT rezaghafarsamar investigatingdisagreementsthroughacontextspecificapproachacaseofiranianl2speakers
_version_ 1725707784040742912