Kritik Pandangan G.H.A. Juynboll terhadap Ilmu al-Jarh wa al-Ta’dil
The orientalist assumed that the method of ahl ḥadīts is only focused on the sanad analysis. Beyond that, they also give a critic of the sanad analysis methods and assume that is problematic. Among orientalists who discuss sanad is G.H.A. Juynboll. Besides, he agreed with his predecessors about the...
Main Author: | Arif Chasanul Muna |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
Universitas Darussalam Gontor
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Kalimah |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/kalimah/article/view/359 |
Similar Items
-
Cerh ve Ta’dil Kriteri Olarak Ehl-i Sünnet ve Ehl-i Bidat
by: Arif Ulu
Published: (2015-11-01) -
An Analytical Inductive Study on the Use of Gestures In Al-Jarḥ wa Al-Taʻdīl (Discrediting and Accrediting Hadith Narrators
by: Fahad abdulaziz al amer
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Al-Ijarah dalam Perspektif Hadis; Kajian Hadis dengan Metode Maudhu’iy
by: Husain Insawan
Published: (2017-06-01) -
METODE KRITIK ABU H{AFS{ UMAR BIN ALI AL-BAS{RI AL-FALLA>S TERHADAP PARA PERAWI HADIS
by: Ulin Niam Masruri
Published: (2016-06-01) -
PERAN ABU AL-ARAB AT-TAMIMI AL-QAYRAWANI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN HADIS DI TUNISIA
by: Umma Farida
Published: (2016-11-01)