Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is utilised to cure haematological malignancies through a combination of conditioning regimen intensity and immunological disease control via the graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. Currently, conventional myeloablative chemotherapeutic or chemoradiation...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Immunology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.749094/full |
id |
doaj-6e2b80f0c6484bedbf8c1b6ec203d5b5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joanne E. Davis Joanne E. Davis Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Mandy J. Ludford-Menting Mandy J. Ludford-Menting Ashvind Prabahran Ashvind Prabahran Ashvind Prabahran Eric Wong Eric Wong Eric Wong Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Rachel M. Koldej Rachel M. Koldej David S. Ritchie David S. Ritchie David S. Ritchie |
spellingShingle |
Joanne E. Davis Joanne E. Davis Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Mandy J. Ludford-Menting Mandy J. Ludford-Menting Ashvind Prabahran Ashvind Prabahran Ashvind Prabahran Eric Wong Eric Wong Eric Wong Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Rachel M. Koldej Rachel M. Koldej David S. Ritchie David S. Ritchie David S. Ritchie Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Frontiers in Immunology venetoclax ruxolitinib reduced intensity conditioning graft versus tumour effect MHC class-II graft versus host disease |
author_facet |
Joanne E. Davis Joanne E. Davis Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Kelei Du Mandy J. Ludford-Menting Mandy J. Ludford-Menting Ashvind Prabahran Ashvind Prabahran Ashvind Prabahran Eric Wong Eric Wong Eric Wong Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Nicholas D. Huntington Rachel M. Koldej Rachel M. Koldej David S. Ritchie David S. Ritchie David S. Ritchie |
author_sort |
Joanne E. Davis |
title |
Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients |
title_short |
Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients |
title_full |
Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients |
title_fullStr |
Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients |
title_sort |
venetoclax or ruxolitinib in pre-transplant conditioning lowers the engraftment barrier by different mechanisms in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Immunology |
issn |
1664-3224 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is utilised to cure haematological malignancies through a combination of conditioning regimen intensity and immunological disease control via the graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. Currently, conventional myeloablative chemotherapeutic or chemoradiation conditioning regimens are associated with significant side effects including graft versus host disease (GVHD), infection, and organ toxicity. Conversely, more tolerable reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are associated with unacceptably higher rates of disease relapse, partly through an excess incidence of mixed chimerism. Improvement in post-alloSCT outcomes therefore depends on promotion of the GVT effect whilst simultaneously reducing conditioning-related toxicity. We have previously shown that this could be achieved through BCL-2 inhibition, and in this study, we explored the modulation of JAK1/2 as a strategy to lower the barrier to donor engraftment in the setting of RIC. We investigated the impact of short-term treatment of BCL2 (venetoclax) or JAK1/2 (ruxolitinib) inhibition on recipient natural killer and T cell immunity and the subsequent effect on donor engraftment. We identified striking differences in mechanism of action of these two drugs on immune cell subsets in the bone marrow of recipients, and in the regulation of MHC class-II and interferon-inducible gene expression, leading to different rates of GVHD. This study demonstrates that the repurposed use of ruxolitinib or venetoclax can be utilised as pre-transplant immune-modulators to promote the efficacy of alloSCT, whilst reducing its toxicity. |
topic |
venetoclax ruxolitinib reduced intensity conditioning graft versus tumour effect MHC class-II graft versus host disease |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.749094/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joanneedavis venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT joanneedavis venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT mandyjludfordmenting venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT mandyjludfordmenting venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT ashvindprabahran venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT ashvindprabahran venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT ashvindprabahran venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT ericwong venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT ericwong venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT ericwong venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT rachelmkoldej venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT rachelmkoldej venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT davidsritchie venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT davidsritchie venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients AT davidsritchie venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients |
_version_ |
1717370110225678336 |
spelling |
doaj-6e2b80f0c6484bedbf8c1b6ec203d5b52021-09-24T06:33:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242021-09-011210.3389/fimmu.2021.749094749094Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant RecipientsJoanne E. Davis0Joanne E. Davis1Kelei Du2Kelei Du3Kelei Du4Kelei Du5Kelei Du6Mandy J. Ludford-Menting7Mandy J. Ludford-Menting8Ashvind Prabahran9Ashvind Prabahran10Ashvind Prabahran11Eric Wong12Eric Wong13Eric Wong14Nicholas D. Huntington15Nicholas D. Huntington16Nicholas D. Huntington17Nicholas D. Huntington18Rachel M. Koldej19Rachel M. Koldej20David S. Ritchie21David S. Ritchie22David S. Ritchie23Australian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaMolecular Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaClinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaClinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaMolecular Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaoNKo-Innate Pty Ltd., Moonee Ponds, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaClinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAllogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is utilised to cure haematological malignancies through a combination of conditioning regimen intensity and immunological disease control via the graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. Currently, conventional myeloablative chemotherapeutic or chemoradiation conditioning regimens are associated with significant side effects including graft versus host disease (GVHD), infection, and organ toxicity. Conversely, more tolerable reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are associated with unacceptably higher rates of disease relapse, partly through an excess incidence of mixed chimerism. Improvement in post-alloSCT outcomes therefore depends on promotion of the GVT effect whilst simultaneously reducing conditioning-related toxicity. We have previously shown that this could be achieved through BCL-2 inhibition, and in this study, we explored the modulation of JAK1/2 as a strategy to lower the barrier to donor engraftment in the setting of RIC. We investigated the impact of short-term treatment of BCL2 (venetoclax) or JAK1/2 (ruxolitinib) inhibition on recipient natural killer and T cell immunity and the subsequent effect on donor engraftment. We identified striking differences in mechanism of action of these two drugs on immune cell subsets in the bone marrow of recipients, and in the regulation of MHC class-II and interferon-inducible gene expression, leading to different rates of GVHD. This study demonstrates that the repurposed use of ruxolitinib or venetoclax can be utilised as pre-transplant immune-modulators to promote the efficacy of alloSCT, whilst reducing its toxicity.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.749094/fullvenetoclaxruxolitinibreduced intensity conditioninggraft versus tumour effectMHC class-IIgraft versus host disease |