Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is utilised to cure haematological malignancies through a combination of conditioning regimen intensity and immunological disease control via the graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. Currently, conventional myeloablative chemotherapeutic or chemoradiation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanne E. Davis, Kelei Du, Mandy J. Ludford-Menting, Ashvind Prabahran, Eric Wong, Nicholas D. Huntington, Rachel M. Koldej, David S. Ritchie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.749094/full
id doaj-6e2b80f0c6484bedbf8c1b6ec203d5b5
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joanne E. Davis
Joanne E. Davis
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Mandy J. Ludford-Menting
Mandy J. Ludford-Menting
Ashvind Prabahran
Ashvind Prabahran
Ashvind Prabahran
Eric Wong
Eric Wong
Eric Wong
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Rachel M. Koldej
Rachel M. Koldej
David S. Ritchie
David S. Ritchie
David S. Ritchie
spellingShingle Joanne E. Davis
Joanne E. Davis
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Mandy J. Ludford-Menting
Mandy J. Ludford-Menting
Ashvind Prabahran
Ashvind Prabahran
Ashvind Prabahran
Eric Wong
Eric Wong
Eric Wong
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Rachel M. Koldej
Rachel M. Koldej
David S. Ritchie
David S. Ritchie
David S. Ritchie
Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
Frontiers in Immunology
venetoclax
ruxolitinib
reduced intensity conditioning
graft versus tumour effect
MHC class-II
graft versus host disease
author_facet Joanne E. Davis
Joanne E. Davis
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Kelei Du
Mandy J. Ludford-Menting
Mandy J. Ludford-Menting
Ashvind Prabahran
Ashvind Prabahran
Ashvind Prabahran
Eric Wong
Eric Wong
Eric Wong
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Nicholas D. Huntington
Rachel M. Koldej
Rachel M. Koldej
David S. Ritchie
David S. Ritchie
David S. Ritchie
author_sort Joanne E. Davis
title Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
title_short Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
title_full Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
title_fullStr Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
title_full_unstemmed Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
title_sort venetoclax or ruxolitinib in pre-transplant conditioning lowers the engraftment barrier by different mechanisms in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Immunology
issn 1664-3224
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is utilised to cure haematological malignancies through a combination of conditioning regimen intensity and immunological disease control via the graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. Currently, conventional myeloablative chemotherapeutic or chemoradiation conditioning regimens are associated with significant side effects including graft versus host disease (GVHD), infection, and organ toxicity. Conversely, more tolerable reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are associated with unacceptably higher rates of disease relapse, partly through an excess incidence of mixed chimerism. Improvement in post-alloSCT outcomes therefore depends on promotion of the GVT effect whilst simultaneously reducing conditioning-related toxicity. We have previously shown that this could be achieved through BCL-2 inhibition, and in this study, we explored the modulation of JAK1/2 as a strategy to lower the barrier to donor engraftment in the setting of RIC. We investigated the impact of short-term treatment of BCL2 (venetoclax) or JAK1/2 (ruxolitinib) inhibition on recipient natural killer and T cell immunity and the subsequent effect on donor engraftment. We identified striking differences in mechanism of action of these two drugs on immune cell subsets in the bone marrow of recipients, and in the regulation of MHC class-II and interferon-inducible gene expression, leading to different rates of GVHD. This study demonstrates that the repurposed use of ruxolitinib or venetoclax can be utilised as pre-transplant immune-modulators to promote the efficacy of alloSCT, whilst reducing its toxicity.
topic venetoclax
ruxolitinib
reduced intensity conditioning
graft versus tumour effect
MHC class-II
graft versus host disease
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.749094/full
work_keys_str_mv AT joanneedavis venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT joanneedavis venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT keleidu venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT mandyjludfordmenting venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT mandyjludfordmenting venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT ashvindprabahran venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT ashvindprabahran venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT ashvindprabahran venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT ericwong venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT ericwong venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT ericwong venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT nicholasdhuntington venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT rachelmkoldej venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT rachelmkoldej venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT davidsritchie venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT davidsritchie venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
AT davidsritchie venetoclaxorruxolitinibinpretransplantconditioninglowerstheengraftmentbarrierbydifferentmechanismsinallogeneicstemcelltransplantrecipients
_version_ 1717370110225678336
spelling doaj-6e2b80f0c6484bedbf8c1b6ec203d5b52021-09-24T06:33:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242021-09-011210.3389/fimmu.2021.749094749094Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant RecipientsJoanne E. Davis0Joanne E. Davis1Kelei Du2Kelei Du3Kelei Du4Kelei Du5Kelei Du6Mandy J. Ludford-Menting7Mandy J. Ludford-Menting8Ashvind Prabahran9Ashvind Prabahran10Ashvind Prabahran11Eric Wong12Eric Wong13Eric Wong14Nicholas D. Huntington15Nicholas D. Huntington16Nicholas D. Huntington17Nicholas D. Huntington18Rachel M. Koldej19Rachel M. Koldej20David S. Ritchie21David S. Ritchie22David S. Ritchie23Australian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaMolecular Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaClinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaClinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaMolecular Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, AustraliaoNKo-Innate Pty Ltd., Moonee Ponds, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAustralian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaThe Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaClinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaAllogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is utilised to cure haematological malignancies through a combination of conditioning regimen intensity and immunological disease control via the graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. Currently, conventional myeloablative chemotherapeutic or chemoradiation conditioning regimens are associated with significant side effects including graft versus host disease (GVHD), infection, and organ toxicity. Conversely, more tolerable reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are associated with unacceptably higher rates of disease relapse, partly through an excess incidence of mixed chimerism. Improvement in post-alloSCT outcomes therefore depends on promotion of the GVT effect whilst simultaneously reducing conditioning-related toxicity. We have previously shown that this could be achieved through BCL-2 inhibition, and in this study, we explored the modulation of JAK1/2 as a strategy to lower the barrier to donor engraftment in the setting of RIC. We investigated the impact of short-term treatment of BCL2 (venetoclax) or JAK1/2 (ruxolitinib) inhibition on recipient natural killer and T cell immunity and the subsequent effect on donor engraftment. We identified striking differences in mechanism of action of these two drugs on immune cell subsets in the bone marrow of recipients, and in the regulation of MHC class-II and interferon-inducible gene expression, leading to different rates of GVHD. This study demonstrates that the repurposed use of ruxolitinib or venetoclax can be utilised as pre-transplant immune-modulators to promote the efficacy of alloSCT, whilst reducing its toxicity.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.749094/fullvenetoclaxruxolitinibreduced intensity conditioninggraft versus tumour effectMHC class-IIgraft versus host disease