Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.

<h4>Background and aims</h4>Healthcare professionals are required to conduct quality control of endoscopy procedures, and yet there is no standardised method for assessing quality. The topic of the present study was to validate the applicability of the procedure in daily practice, giving...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romain Coriat, Augustin Lecler, Dominique Lamarque, Jacques Deyra, Hervé Roche, Catherine Nizou, Olivier Berretta, Bruno Mesnard, Martin Bouygues, Alain Soupison, Jean-Luc Monnin, Philippe Podevin, Carole Cassaz, Denis Sautereau, Frédéric Prat, Stanislas Chaussade
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22509267/?tool=EBI
id doaj-6e17d5784702485eaf4d9cc9670e155a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e17d5784702485eaf4d9cc9670e155a2021-03-04T00:53:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0174e3395710.1371/journal.pone.0033957Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.Romain CoriatAugustin LeclerDominique LamarqueJacques DeyraHervé RocheCatherine NizouOlivier BerrettaBruno MesnardMartin BouyguesAlain SoupisonJean-Luc MonninPhilippe PodevinCarole CassazDenis SautereauFrédéric PratStanislas Chaussade<h4>Background and aims</h4>Healthcare professionals are required to conduct quality control of endoscopy procedures, and yet there is no standardised method for assessing quality. The topic of the present study was to validate the applicability of the procedure in daily practice, giving physicians the ability to define areas for continuous quality improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>In ten endoscopy units in France, 200 patients per centre undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled in the study. An evaluation was carried out based on a prospectively developed checklist of 10 quality-control indicators including five dependent upon and five independent of the colonoscopy procedure.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 2000 procedures, 30% were done at general hospitals, 20% at university hospitals, and 50% in private practices. The colonoscopies were carried out for a valid indication for 95.9% (range 92.5-100). Colon preparation was insufficient in 3.7% (range 1-10.5). Colonoscopies were successful in 95.3% (range 81-99). Adenoma detection rate was 0.31 (range 0.17-0.45) in successful colonoscopies.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This tool for evaluating the quality of colonoscopy procedures in healthcare units is based on standard endoscopy and patient criteria. It is an easy and feasible procedure giving the ability to detect suboptimal practice and differences between endoscopy-units. It will enable individual units to assess the quality of their colonoscopy techniques.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22509267/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Romain Coriat
Augustin Lecler
Dominique Lamarque
Jacques Deyra
Hervé Roche
Catherine Nizou
Olivier Berretta
Bruno Mesnard
Martin Bouygues
Alain Soupison
Jean-Luc Monnin
Philippe Podevin
Carole Cassaz
Denis Sautereau
Frédéric Prat
Stanislas Chaussade
spellingShingle Romain Coriat
Augustin Lecler
Dominique Lamarque
Jacques Deyra
Hervé Roche
Catherine Nizou
Olivier Berretta
Bruno Mesnard
Martin Bouygues
Alain Soupison
Jean-Luc Monnin
Philippe Podevin
Carole Cassaz
Denis Sautereau
Frédéric Prat
Stanislas Chaussade
Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Romain Coriat
Augustin Lecler
Dominique Lamarque
Jacques Deyra
Hervé Roche
Catherine Nizou
Olivier Berretta
Bruno Mesnard
Martin Bouygues
Alain Soupison
Jean-Luc Monnin
Philippe Podevin
Carole Cassaz
Denis Sautereau
Frédéric Prat
Stanislas Chaussade
author_sort Romain Coriat
title Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
title_short Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
title_full Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
title_fullStr Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
title_sort quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <h4>Background and aims</h4>Healthcare professionals are required to conduct quality control of endoscopy procedures, and yet there is no standardised method for assessing quality. The topic of the present study was to validate the applicability of the procedure in daily practice, giving physicians the ability to define areas for continuous quality improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>In ten endoscopy units in France, 200 patients per centre undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled in the study. An evaluation was carried out based on a prospectively developed checklist of 10 quality-control indicators including five dependent upon and five independent of the colonoscopy procedure.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 2000 procedures, 30% were done at general hospitals, 20% at university hospitals, and 50% in private practices. The colonoscopies were carried out for a valid indication for 95.9% (range 92.5-100). Colon preparation was insufficient in 3.7% (range 1-10.5). Colonoscopies were successful in 95.3% (range 81-99). Adenoma detection rate was 0.31 (range 0.17-0.45) in successful colonoscopies.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This tool for evaluating the quality of colonoscopy procedures in healthcare units is based on standard endoscopy and patient criteria. It is an easy and feasible procedure giving the ability to detect suboptimal practice and differences between endoscopy-units. It will enable individual units to assess the quality of their colonoscopy techniques.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22509267/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT romaincoriat qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT augustinlecler qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT dominiquelamarque qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT jacquesdeyra qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT herveroche qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT catherinenizou qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT olivierberretta qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT brunomesnard qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT martinbouygues qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT alainsoupison qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT jeanlucmonnin qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT philippepodevin qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT carolecassaz qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT denissautereau qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT fredericprat qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
AT stanislaschaussade qualityindicatorsforcolonoscopyproceduresaprospectivemulticentremethodforendoscopyunits
_version_ 1714809845489598464