In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the disintegration of luting agents. An intraoral sample holder was made having four holes of 1.4 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. The holder was soldered onto the buccal surface of an orthodontic band, which was cemented to the first upper molar in 12 patients,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deniz Gemalmaz, Cornelis H. Pameijer, Mark Latta, Ferah Kuybulu, Toros Alcan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831508
id doaj-6e17bc52af3c48e8989e3f01b04d0a86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e17bc52af3c48e8989e3f01b04d0a862020-11-24T22:49:12ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/831508831508In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting AgentsDeniz Gemalmaz0Cornelis H. Pameijer1Mark Latta2Ferah Kuybulu3Toros Alcan4Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Marmara University, 34726 Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030, USASchool of Dentistry, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USADepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Marmara University, 34726 Istanbul, TurkeyDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Marmara University, 34365 Istanbul, TurkeyThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the disintegration of luting agents. An intraoral sample holder was made having four holes of 1.4 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. The holder was soldered onto the buccal surface of an orthodontic band, which was cemented to the first upper molar in 12 patients, average age 26 years. The holes were filled with a zinc phosphate (Phosphate Kulzer), a glass ionomer (Ketac Cem), a resin-modified-glass ionomer (Fuji Plus), and a resin cement (Calibra). Impressions were made at baseline, and 6, 12, and 18 months from which epoxy replicas were made, which were scanned with an optical scanner. Total volume loss was calculated. The rank order of mean volume loss was as follows: Phosphate cement > Ketac Cem = Fuji Plus = Calibra. Cement type and time had statistically significant effects on volume loss of cements (P<0.001). Under in vivo conditions, zinc phosphate cement disintegrated the most, whereas no significant difference was observed for glass ionomer and resin-based cements. As intraoral conditions are considerably less aggressive than experimental laboratory conditions, the erosion behavior of glass ionomer cement was found to be similar to the resin-based cements in contradiction to previous laboratory results.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831508
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deniz Gemalmaz
Cornelis H. Pameijer
Mark Latta
Ferah Kuybulu
Toros Alcan
spellingShingle Deniz Gemalmaz
Cornelis H. Pameijer
Mark Latta
Ferah Kuybulu
Toros Alcan
In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Deniz Gemalmaz
Cornelis H. Pameijer
Mark Latta
Ferah Kuybulu
Toros Alcan
author_sort Deniz Gemalmaz
title In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_short In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_full In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_fullStr In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Disintegration of Four Different Luting Agents
title_sort in vivo disintegration of four different luting agents
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2012-01-01
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the disintegration of luting agents. An intraoral sample holder was made having four holes of 1.4 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. The holder was soldered onto the buccal surface of an orthodontic band, which was cemented to the first upper molar in 12 patients, average age 26 years. The holes were filled with a zinc phosphate (Phosphate Kulzer), a glass ionomer (Ketac Cem), a resin-modified-glass ionomer (Fuji Plus), and a resin cement (Calibra). Impressions were made at baseline, and 6, 12, and 18 months from which epoxy replicas were made, which were scanned with an optical scanner. Total volume loss was calculated. The rank order of mean volume loss was as follows: Phosphate cement > Ketac Cem = Fuji Plus = Calibra. Cement type and time had statistically significant effects on volume loss of cements (P<0.001). Under in vivo conditions, zinc phosphate cement disintegrated the most, whereas no significant difference was observed for glass ionomer and resin-based cements. As intraoral conditions are considerably less aggressive than experimental laboratory conditions, the erosion behavior of glass ionomer cement was found to be similar to the resin-based cements in contradiction to previous laboratory results.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/831508
work_keys_str_mv AT denizgemalmaz invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT cornelishpameijer invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT marklatta invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT ferahkuybulu invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
AT torosalcan invivodisintegrationoffourdifferentlutingagents
_version_ 1725676878676623360