A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.

Birth defects are prenatal morphological or functional anomalies. Associations among them are studied to identify their etiopathogenesis. The graph theory methods allow analyzing relationships among a complete set of anomalies. A graph consists of nodes which represent the entities (birth defects in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dario Elias, Hebe Campaña, Fernando Poletta, Silvina Heisecke, Juan Gili, Julia Ratowiecki, Lucas Gimenez, Mariela Pawluk, Maria Rita Santos, Viviana Cosentino, Rocio Uranga, Monica Rittler, Jorge Lopez Camelo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233529
id doaj-6e087238f15442b0b396b544243e944a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e087238f15442b0b396b544243e944a2021-03-03T21:55:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01155e023352910.1371/journal.pone.0233529A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.Dario EliasHebe CampañaFernando PolettaSilvina HeiseckeJuan GiliJulia RatowieckiLucas GimenezMariela PawlukMaria Rita SantosViviana CosentinoRocio UrangaMonica RittlerJorge Lopez CameloBirth defects are prenatal morphological or functional anomalies. Associations among them are studied to identify their etiopathogenesis. The graph theory methods allow analyzing relationships among a complete set of anomalies. A graph consists of nodes which represent the entities (birth defects in the present work), and edges that join nodes indicating the relationships among them. The aim of the present study was to validate the graph theory methods to study birth defect associations. All birth defects monitoring records from the Estudio Colaborativo Latino Americano de Malformaciones Congénitas gathered between 1967 and 2017 were used. From around 5 million live and stillborn infants, 170,430 had one or more birth defects. Volume-adjusted Chi-Square was used to determine the association strength between two birth defects and to weight the graph edges. The complete birth defect graph showed a Log-Normal degree distribution and its characteristics differed from random, scale-free and small-world graphs. The graph comprised 118 nodes and 550 edges. Birth defects with the highest centrality values were nonspecific codes such as Other upper limb anomalies. After partition, the graph yielded 12 groups; most of them were recognizable and included conditions such as VATER and OEIS associations, and Patau syndrome. Our findings validate the graph theory methods to study birth defect associations. This method may contribute to identify underlying etiopathogeneses as well as to improve coding systems.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233529
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dario Elias
Hebe Campaña
Fernando Poletta
Silvina Heisecke
Juan Gili
Julia Ratowiecki
Lucas Gimenez
Mariela Pawluk
Maria Rita Santos
Viviana Cosentino
Rocio Uranga
Monica Rittler
Jorge Lopez Camelo
spellingShingle Dario Elias
Hebe Campaña
Fernando Poletta
Silvina Heisecke
Juan Gili
Julia Ratowiecki
Lucas Gimenez
Mariela Pawluk
Maria Rita Santos
Viviana Cosentino
Rocio Uranga
Monica Rittler
Jorge Lopez Camelo
A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Dario Elias
Hebe Campaña
Fernando Poletta
Silvina Heisecke
Juan Gili
Julia Ratowiecki
Lucas Gimenez
Mariela Pawluk
Maria Rita Santos
Viviana Cosentino
Rocio Uranga
Monica Rittler
Jorge Lopez Camelo
author_sort Dario Elias
title A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.
title_short A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.
title_full A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.
title_fullStr A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.
title_full_unstemmed A graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.
title_sort graph theory approach to analyze birth defect associations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Birth defects are prenatal morphological or functional anomalies. Associations among them are studied to identify their etiopathogenesis. The graph theory methods allow analyzing relationships among a complete set of anomalies. A graph consists of nodes which represent the entities (birth defects in the present work), and edges that join nodes indicating the relationships among them. The aim of the present study was to validate the graph theory methods to study birth defect associations. All birth defects monitoring records from the Estudio Colaborativo Latino Americano de Malformaciones Congénitas gathered between 1967 and 2017 were used. From around 5 million live and stillborn infants, 170,430 had one or more birth defects. Volume-adjusted Chi-Square was used to determine the association strength between two birth defects and to weight the graph edges. The complete birth defect graph showed a Log-Normal degree distribution and its characteristics differed from random, scale-free and small-world graphs. The graph comprised 118 nodes and 550 edges. Birth defects with the highest centrality values were nonspecific codes such as Other upper limb anomalies. After partition, the graph yielded 12 groups; most of them were recognizable and included conditions such as VATER and OEIS associations, and Patau syndrome. Our findings validate the graph theory methods to study birth defect associations. This method may contribute to identify underlying etiopathogeneses as well as to improve coding systems.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233529
work_keys_str_mv AT darioelias agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT hebecampana agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT fernandopoletta agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT silvinaheisecke agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT juangili agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT juliaratowiecki agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT lucasgimenez agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT marielapawluk agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT mariaritasantos agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT vivianacosentino agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT rociouranga agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT monicarittler agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT jorgelopezcamelo agraphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT darioelias graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT hebecampana graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT fernandopoletta graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT silvinaheisecke graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT juangili graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT juliaratowiecki graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT lucasgimenez graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT marielapawluk graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT mariaritasantos graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT vivianacosentino graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT rociouranga graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT monicarittler graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
AT jorgelopezcamelo graphtheoryapproachtoanalyzebirthdefectassociations
_version_ 1714814434274181120