Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric Fishes

Eavesdropping by electroreceptive predators poses a conflict for weakly electric fish, which depend on their Electric Organ Discharge (EOD) signals both for navigation and communication in the dark. The EODs that allow weakly electric fish to electrolocate and communicate in the dark may attract ele...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philip K. Stoddard, Alex Tran, Rüdiger Krahe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00264/full
id doaj-6e08544a65ec4b17aee1feeb3bd5c363
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e08544a65ec4b17aee1feeb3bd5c3632020-11-24T21:53:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2019-07-01710.3389/fevo.2019.00264441716Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric FishesPhilip K. Stoddard0Alex Tran1Rüdiger Krahe2Rüdiger Krahe3Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United StatesDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CanadaAbt. Verhaltensphysiologie Philippstr, Institut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyEavesdropping by electroreceptive predators poses a conflict for weakly electric fish, which depend on their Electric Organ Discharge (EOD) signals both for navigation and communication in the dark. The EODs that allow weakly electric fish to electrolocate and communicate in the dark may attract electroreceptive predators such as catfishes and Electric Eels. These predators share with their prey the synapomorphy of passive electric sense supported by ampullary electroreceptors that are highly sensitive to low-frequency electric fields. Any low-frequency spectral components of the EOD make weakly electric fish conspicuous and vulnerable to attack from electroreceptive predators. Accordingly, most weakly electric fish shift spectral energy upwards or cloak low-frequency energy with compensatory masking signals. Subadults and females in particular emit virtually no low-frequency energy in their EODs, whereas courting males include a significant low-frequency component, which likely attracts females, but makes the signals conspicuous to predators. Males of species that coexist with the most predators tend to produce the least low-frequency signal energy, expressing sexual dimorphism in their signals in less risky ways. In these respects, electric signals follow the classic responses to opposing forces of natural and sexual selection, as exemplified in the visual signals of guppies and the acoustic signals of Túngara frogs. Unique to electric fish is that the electric signal modifications that help elude detection by electroreceptive predators are additions to the basal signal rather than losses of attractive components. These enhancements that enable crypsis are energetically costly, but have also provided the evolutionary substrates for subsequent sexual selection and species identity characters.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00264/fullcatfishelectroreceptionGymnotiformesMormyridaepredationsensory drive
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philip K. Stoddard
Alex Tran
Rüdiger Krahe
Rüdiger Krahe
spellingShingle Philip K. Stoddard
Alex Tran
Rüdiger Krahe
Rüdiger Krahe
Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric Fishes
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
catfish
electroreception
Gymnotiformes
Mormyridae
predation
sensory drive
author_facet Philip K. Stoddard
Alex Tran
Rüdiger Krahe
Rüdiger Krahe
author_sort Philip K. Stoddard
title Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric Fishes
title_short Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric Fishes
title_full Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric Fishes
title_fullStr Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric Fishes
title_full_unstemmed Predation and Crypsis in the Evolution of Electric Signaling in Weakly Electric Fishes
title_sort predation and crypsis in the evolution of electric signaling in weakly electric fishes
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
issn 2296-701X
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Eavesdropping by electroreceptive predators poses a conflict for weakly electric fish, which depend on their Electric Organ Discharge (EOD) signals both for navigation and communication in the dark. The EODs that allow weakly electric fish to electrolocate and communicate in the dark may attract electroreceptive predators such as catfishes and Electric Eels. These predators share with their prey the synapomorphy of passive electric sense supported by ampullary electroreceptors that are highly sensitive to low-frequency electric fields. Any low-frequency spectral components of the EOD make weakly electric fish conspicuous and vulnerable to attack from electroreceptive predators. Accordingly, most weakly electric fish shift spectral energy upwards or cloak low-frequency energy with compensatory masking signals. Subadults and females in particular emit virtually no low-frequency energy in their EODs, whereas courting males include a significant low-frequency component, which likely attracts females, but makes the signals conspicuous to predators. Males of species that coexist with the most predators tend to produce the least low-frequency signal energy, expressing sexual dimorphism in their signals in less risky ways. In these respects, electric signals follow the classic responses to opposing forces of natural and sexual selection, as exemplified in the visual signals of guppies and the acoustic signals of Túngara frogs. Unique to electric fish is that the electric signal modifications that help elude detection by electroreceptive predators are additions to the basal signal rather than losses of attractive components. These enhancements that enable crypsis are energetically costly, but have also provided the evolutionary substrates for subsequent sexual selection and species identity characters.
topic catfish
electroreception
Gymnotiformes
Mormyridae
predation
sensory drive
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fevo.2019.00264/full
work_keys_str_mv AT philipkstoddard predationandcrypsisintheevolutionofelectricsignalinginweaklyelectricfishes
AT alextran predationandcrypsisintheevolutionofelectricsignalinginweaklyelectricfishes
AT rudigerkrahe predationandcrypsisintheevolutionofelectricsignalinginweaklyelectricfishes
AT rudigerkrahe predationandcrypsisintheevolutionofelectricsignalinginweaklyelectricfishes
_version_ 1725869681617666048