Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions

Background: Integrated healthcare delivery is a policy goal of healthcare systems. There is no consensus on how to measure the concept, which makes it difficult to monitor progress. <br><br> Purpose: To identify the different types of methods used to measure integrated healthcare deliver...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Strandberg-Larsen, Allan Krasnik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2009-02-01
Series:International Journal of Integrated Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijic.org/articles/305
id doaj-6df73c80cc91483a9d7e0865301e97d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6df73c80cc91483a9d7e0865301e97d72020-11-24T22:08:54ZengUbiquity PressInternational Journal of Integrated Care1568-41562009-02-019110.5334/ijic.305305Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directionsMartin Strandberg-LarsenAllan KrasnikBackground: Integrated healthcare delivery is a policy goal of healthcare systems. There is no consensus on how to measure the concept, which makes it difficult to monitor progress. <br><br> Purpose: To identify the different types of methods used to measure integrated healthcare delivery with emphasis on structural, cultural and process aspects. <br><br> Methods: Medline/Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WHOLIS, and conventional internet search engines were systematically searched for methods to measure integrated healthcare delivery (published – April 2008). <br><br> Results: Twenty-four published scientific papers and documents met the inclusion criteria. In the 24 references we identified 24 different measurement methods; however, 5 methods shared theoretical framework. The methods can be categorized according to type of data source: a) questionnaire survey data, b) automated register data, or c) mixed data sources. The variety of concepts measured reflects the significant conceptual diversity within the field, and most methods lack information regarding validity and reliability. <br><br> Conclusion: Several methods have been developed to measure integrated healthcare delivery; 24 methods are available and some are highly developed. The objective governs the method best used. Criteria for sound measures are suggested and further developments should be based on an explicit conceptual framework and focus on simplifying and validating existing methods.http://www.ijic.org/articles/305integrated healthcare deliverymethodsliterature reviewquality of healthcare
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Allan Krasnik
spellingShingle Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Allan Krasnik
Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions
International Journal of Integrated Care
integrated healthcare delivery
methods
literature review
quality of healthcare
author_facet Martin Strandberg-Larsen
Allan Krasnik
author_sort Martin Strandberg-Larsen
title Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions
title_short Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions
title_full Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions
title_fullStr Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions
title_sort measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions
publisher Ubiquity Press
series International Journal of Integrated Care
issn 1568-4156
publishDate 2009-02-01
description Background: Integrated healthcare delivery is a policy goal of healthcare systems. There is no consensus on how to measure the concept, which makes it difficult to monitor progress. <br><br> Purpose: To identify the different types of methods used to measure integrated healthcare delivery with emphasis on structural, cultural and process aspects. <br><br> Methods: Medline/Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WHOLIS, and conventional internet search engines were systematically searched for methods to measure integrated healthcare delivery (published – April 2008). <br><br> Results: Twenty-four published scientific papers and documents met the inclusion criteria. In the 24 references we identified 24 different measurement methods; however, 5 methods shared theoretical framework. The methods can be categorized according to type of data source: a) questionnaire survey data, b) automated register data, or c) mixed data sources. The variety of concepts measured reflects the significant conceptual diversity within the field, and most methods lack information regarding validity and reliability. <br><br> Conclusion: Several methods have been developed to measure integrated healthcare delivery; 24 methods are available and some are highly developed. The objective governs the method best used. Criteria for sound measures are suggested and further developments should be based on an explicit conceptual framework and focus on simplifying and validating existing methods.
topic integrated healthcare delivery
methods
literature review
quality of healthcare
url http://www.ijic.org/articles/305
work_keys_str_mv AT martinstrandberglarsen measurementofintegratedhealthcaredeliveryasystematicreviewofmethodsandfutureresearchdirections
AT allankrasnik measurementofintegratedhealthcaredeliveryasystematicreviewofmethodsandfutureresearchdirections
_version_ 1725814057077833728