Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
Abstract In the literature, it was proposed that the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ is useful to distinguish the scenarios of dark energy and modified gravity. In the present work, we consider the constraints on the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ by using the latest observational data. To be model-independe...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-08-01
|
Series: | European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8 |
id |
doaj-6dc3d32dedf847e38597039f7b268c94 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6dc3d32dedf847e38597039f7b268c942020-11-25T02:58:47ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60441434-60522019-08-0179811210.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8Observational constraints on growth index with cosmographyZhao-Yu Yin0Hao Wei1School of Physics, Beijing Institute of TechnologySchool of Physics, Beijing Institute of TechnologyAbstract In the literature, it was proposed that the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ is useful to distinguish the scenarios of dark energy and modified gravity. In the present work, we consider the constraints on the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ by using the latest observational data. To be model-independent, we use cosmography to describe the cosmic expansion history, and also expand the general $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) as a Taylor series with respect to redshift z or y-shift, $$y=z/(1+z)$$ y=z/(1+z) . We find that the present value $$\gamma _0=\gamma (z=0)\simeq 0.42$$ γ0=γ(z=0)≃0.42 (for most of viable f(R) theories) is inconsistent with the latest observational data at high confidence level (C.L.). On the other hand, $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 (for dark energy models in GR) can be consistent with the latest observational data at $$1\sigma $$ 1σ C.L. in five of the nine cases under consideration, but is inconsistent beyond $$2\sigma $$ 2σ C.L. in the other four cases (while it is still consistent within the $$3\sigma $$ 3σ region). Thus, we can say nothing firmly about $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 . We also find that a varying $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) is favored.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Zhao-Yu Yin Hao Wei |
spellingShingle |
Zhao-Yu Yin Hao Wei Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
author_facet |
Zhao-Yu Yin Hao Wei |
author_sort |
Zhao-Yu Yin |
title |
Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography |
title_short |
Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography |
title_full |
Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography |
title_fullStr |
Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography |
title_sort |
observational constraints on growth index with cosmography |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
issn |
1434-6044 1434-6052 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Abstract In the literature, it was proposed that the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ is useful to distinguish the scenarios of dark energy and modified gravity. In the present work, we consider the constraints on the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ by using the latest observational data. To be model-independent, we use cosmography to describe the cosmic expansion history, and also expand the general $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) as a Taylor series with respect to redshift z or y-shift, $$y=z/(1+z)$$ y=z/(1+z) . We find that the present value $$\gamma _0=\gamma (z=0)\simeq 0.42$$ γ0=γ(z=0)≃0.42 (for most of viable f(R) theories) is inconsistent with the latest observational data at high confidence level (C.L.). On the other hand, $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 (for dark energy models in GR) can be consistent with the latest observational data at $$1\sigma $$ 1σ C.L. in five of the nine cases under consideration, but is inconsistent beyond $$2\sigma $$ 2σ C.L. in the other four cases (while it is still consistent within the $$3\sigma $$ 3σ region). Thus, we can say nothing firmly about $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 . We also find that a varying $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) is favored. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zhaoyuyin observationalconstraintsongrowthindexwithcosmography AT haowei observationalconstraintsongrowthindexwithcosmography |
_version_ |
1724705092265836544 |