Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography

Abstract In the literature, it was proposed that the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ is useful to distinguish the scenarios of dark energy and modified gravity. In the present work, we consider the constraints on the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ by using the latest observational data. To be model-independe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao-Yu Yin, Hao Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-08-01
Series:European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8
id doaj-6dc3d32dedf847e38597039f7b268c94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6dc3d32dedf847e38597039f7b268c942020-11-25T02:58:47ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60441434-60522019-08-0179811210.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8Observational constraints on growth index with cosmographyZhao-Yu Yin0Hao Wei1School of Physics, Beijing Institute of TechnologySchool of Physics, Beijing Institute of TechnologyAbstract In the literature, it was proposed that the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ is useful to distinguish the scenarios of dark energy and modified gravity. In the present work, we consider the constraints on the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ by using the latest observational data. To be model-independent, we use cosmography to describe the cosmic expansion history, and also expand the general $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) as a Taylor series with respect to redshift z or y-shift, $$y=z/(1+z)$$ y=z/(1+z) . We find that the present value $$\gamma _0=\gamma (z=0)\simeq 0.42$$ γ0=γ(z=0)≃0.42 (for most of viable f(R) theories) is inconsistent with the latest observational data at high confidence level (C.L.). On the other hand, $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 (for dark energy models in GR) can be consistent with the latest observational data at $$1\sigma $$ 1σ C.L. in five of the nine cases under consideration, but is inconsistent beyond $$2\sigma $$ 2σ C.L. in the other four cases (while it is still consistent within the $$3\sigma $$ 3σ region). Thus, we can say nothing firmly about $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 . We also find that a varying $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) is favored.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhao-Yu Yin
Hao Wei
spellingShingle Zhao-Yu Yin
Hao Wei
Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
author_facet Zhao-Yu Yin
Hao Wei
author_sort Zhao-Yu Yin
title Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
title_short Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
title_full Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
title_fullStr Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
title_full_unstemmed Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
title_sort observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
publisher SpringerOpen
series European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
issn 1434-6044
1434-6052
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract In the literature, it was proposed that the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ is useful to distinguish the scenarios of dark energy and modified gravity. In the present work, we consider the constraints on the growth index $$\gamma $$ γ by using the latest observational data. To be model-independent, we use cosmography to describe the cosmic expansion history, and also expand the general $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) as a Taylor series with respect to redshift z or y-shift, $$y=z/(1+z)$$ y=z/(1+z) . We find that the present value $$\gamma _0=\gamma (z=0)\simeq 0.42$$ γ0=γ(z=0)≃0.42 (for most of viable f(R) theories) is inconsistent with the latest observational data at high confidence level (C.L.). On the other hand, $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 (for dark energy models in GR) can be consistent with the latest observational data at $$1\sigma $$ 1σ C.L. in five of the nine cases under consideration, but is inconsistent beyond $$2\sigma $$ 2σ C.L. in the other four cases (while it is still consistent within the $$3\sigma $$ 3σ region). Thus, we can say nothing firmly about $$\gamma _0\simeq 0.55$$ γ0≃0.55 . We also find that a varying $$\gamma (z)$$ γ(z) is favored.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyuyin observationalconstraintsongrowthindexwithcosmography
AT haowei observationalconstraintsongrowthindexwithcosmography
_version_ 1724705092265836544