Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study

Abstract. Background:. The incidence of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) is high, and some patients require surgery. Single-port laparoscopy can reduce post-operative pain, and provide better cosmetic effects. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and superiority of single-port laparos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong-Li Zhang, Guo-Cheng Wang, Jun-Jie Qu, Gui-Qiang Du, Wei-Qiang Zhou, Xiu-Yuan Hao, Li-Min Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-02-01
Series:Chinese Medical Journal
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000622
id doaj-6db94be6c0634021a8bb33e52adab0af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6db94be6c0634021a8bb33e52adab0af2020-12-02T07:55:17ZengWolters KluwerChinese Medical Journal0366-69992542-56412020-02-01133328529110.1097/CM9.0000000000000622202002050-00005Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective studyYong-Li Zhang0Guo-Cheng Wang1Jun-Jie Qu2Gui-Qiang Du3Wei-Qiang Zhou4Xiu-Yuan Hao5Li-Min Chen6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201204, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201204, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201204, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201204, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201204, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201204, China.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201204, China.Abstract. Background:. The incidence of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) is high, and some patients require surgery. Single-port laparoscopy can reduce post-operative pain, and provide better cosmetic effects. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) in women after cesarean section. Methods:. This study included 74 patients who were diagnosed with uterine cesarean niche at the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from January 2013 to June 2015. Thirty-seven patients underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal surgery as the case group, and the remaining patients underwent vaginal repair surgery as the control group. We collected data from the inpatient and follow-up medical records. The clinical characteristics of these two groups were compared. The odds ratios and 95% confidential intervals were calculated for each variable by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results:. Patients who underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair had a significantly longer operation time (2.3 [2.0–2.7] vs. 2.0 [1.6–2.3] h, P = 0.015), shorter gas passage time (1.2 [1.0–1.5] vs. 1.7 [1.0–2.0] days, P = 0.012), shorter hospital stay (3.1 [3.0–4.0] vs. 4.5 [4.0–6.0] days, P = 0.019), and fewer complications (0 vs. 4 cases). Univariate analysis showed that depth of the niche (P = 0.021) the mild adhesiolysis score (P = 0.035) and moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.013) were associated with the bladder injury. Multivariate analysis showed that the moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.318–3.526) was the strongest independent predictor of bladder injury. Conclusion:. This study confirmed the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scars.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000622
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yong-Li Zhang
Guo-Cheng Wang
Jun-Jie Qu
Gui-Qiang Du
Wei-Qiang Zhou
Xiu-Yuan Hao
Li-Min Chen
spellingShingle Yong-Li Zhang
Guo-Cheng Wang
Jun-Jie Qu
Gui-Qiang Du
Wei-Qiang Zhou
Xiu-Yuan Hao
Li-Min Chen
Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
Chinese Medical Journal
author_facet Yong-Li Zhang
Guo-Cheng Wang
Jun-Jie Qu
Gui-Qiang Du
Wei-Qiang Zhou
Xiu-Yuan Hao
Li-Min Chen
author_sort Yong-Li Zhang
title Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
title_short Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
title_full Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
title_fullStr Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
title_sort single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of a cesarean scar defect: a single-center retrospective study
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Chinese Medical Journal
issn 0366-6999
2542-5641
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract. Background:. The incidence of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) is high, and some patients require surgery. Single-port laparoscopy can reduce post-operative pain, and provide better cosmetic effects. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scar defect (niche) in women after cesarean section. Methods:. This study included 74 patients who were diagnosed with uterine cesarean niche at the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from January 2013 to June 2015. Thirty-seven patients underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal surgery as the case group, and the remaining patients underwent vaginal repair surgery as the control group. We collected data from the inpatient and follow-up medical records. The clinical characteristics of these two groups were compared. The odds ratios and 95% confidential intervals were calculated for each variable by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results:. Patients who underwent single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair had a significantly longer operation time (2.3 [2.0–2.7] vs. 2.0 [1.6–2.3] h, P = 0.015), shorter gas passage time (1.2 [1.0–1.5] vs. 1.7 [1.0–2.0] days, P = 0.012), shorter hospital stay (3.1 [3.0–4.0] vs. 4.5 [4.0–6.0] days, P = 0.019), and fewer complications (0 vs. 4 cases). Univariate analysis showed that depth of the niche (P = 0.021) the mild adhesiolysis score (P = 0.035) and moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.013) were associated with the bladder injury. Multivariate analysis showed that the moderate adhesiolysis score (P = 0.029; 95% confidence interval, 1.318–3.526) was the strongest independent predictor of bladder injury. Conclusion:. This study confirmed the safety and superiority of single-port laparoscopy-assisted vaginal repair of uterine cesarean scars.
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000622
work_keys_str_mv AT yonglizhang singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT guochengwang singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT junjiequ singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT guiqiangdu singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT weiqiangzhou singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT xiuyuanhao singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
AT liminchen singleportlaparoscopyassistedvaginalrepairofacesareanscardefectasinglecenterretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1724408005768773632