Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.

Several recent studies have reported enhanced memory when retrieval is preceded by repetitive horizontal eye movements, relative to vertical or no eye movements. The reported memory boost has been referred to as the Saccade-Induced Retrieval Enhancement (SIRE) effect. Across two experiments, memory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brady R T Roberts, Myra A Fernandes, Colin M MacLeod
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227790
id doaj-6daac3ff90144a22b1175d0b851a156a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6daac3ff90144a22b1175d0b851a156a2021-03-03T21:25:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022779010.1371/journal.pone.0227790Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.Brady R T RobertsMyra A FernandesColin M MacLeodSeveral recent studies have reported enhanced memory when retrieval is preceded by repetitive horizontal eye movements, relative to vertical or no eye movements. The reported memory boost has been referred to as the Saccade-Induced Retrieval Enhancement (SIRE) effect. Across two experiments, memory performance was compared following repetitive horizontal or vertical eye movements, as well as following a control condition of no eye movements. In Experiment 1, we conceptually replicated Christman and colleagues' seminal study, finding a statistically significant SIRE effect, albeit with weak Bayesian evidence. We therefore sought to conduct another close extension. In Experiment 2, horizontal and vertical eye movement conditions were manipulated separately, and sample size was increased. No evidence of a SIRE effect was found: Bayesian statistical analyses demonstrated significant evidence for a null effect. Taken together, these experiments suggest that the SIRE effect is inconsistent. The current experiments call into question the generalizability of the SIRE effect and suggest that its presence is very sensitive to experimental design. Future work should further assess the robustness of the effect before exploring related theories or underlying mechanisms.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227790
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brady R T Roberts
Myra A Fernandes
Colin M MacLeod
spellingShingle Brady R T Roberts
Myra A Fernandes
Colin M MacLeod
Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Brady R T Roberts
Myra A Fernandes
Colin M MacLeod
author_sort Brady R T Roberts
title Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.
title_short Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.
title_full Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.
title_fullStr Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.
title_sort re-evaluating whether bilateral eye movements influence memory retrieval.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Several recent studies have reported enhanced memory when retrieval is preceded by repetitive horizontal eye movements, relative to vertical or no eye movements. The reported memory boost has been referred to as the Saccade-Induced Retrieval Enhancement (SIRE) effect. Across two experiments, memory performance was compared following repetitive horizontal or vertical eye movements, as well as following a control condition of no eye movements. In Experiment 1, we conceptually replicated Christman and colleagues' seminal study, finding a statistically significant SIRE effect, albeit with weak Bayesian evidence. We therefore sought to conduct another close extension. In Experiment 2, horizontal and vertical eye movement conditions were manipulated separately, and sample size was increased. No evidence of a SIRE effect was found: Bayesian statistical analyses demonstrated significant evidence for a null effect. Taken together, these experiments suggest that the SIRE effect is inconsistent. The current experiments call into question the generalizability of the SIRE effect and suggest that its presence is very sensitive to experimental design. Future work should further assess the robustness of the effect before exploring related theories or underlying mechanisms.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227790
work_keys_str_mv AT bradyrtroberts reevaluatingwhetherbilateraleyemovementsinfluencememoryretrieval
AT myraafernandes reevaluatingwhetherbilateraleyemovementsinfluencememoryretrieval
AT colinmmacleod reevaluatingwhetherbilateraleyemovementsinfluencememoryretrieval
_version_ 1714816861229547520