Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?

Recent work found that experimental pain appeared to negate alterations in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) that occurred in response to motor learning acquisition of a novel tracing task. The goal of this experiment was to further investigate the interactive effects of pain stimulus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erin Dancey, Paul Yielder, Bernadette Murphy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/8/10/179
id doaj-6d9dd58cf6474826866af7e8288ed731
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d9dd58cf6474826866af7e8288ed7312020-11-24T21:46:47ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252018-09-0181017910.3390/brainsci8100179brainsci8100179Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?Erin Dancey0Paul Yielder1Bernadette Murphy2University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Ontario, ON L1G 0C5, CanadaUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology, Ontario, ON L1G 0C5, CanadaUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology, Ontario, ON L1G 0C5, CanadaRecent work found that experimental pain appeared to negate alterations in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) that occurred in response to motor learning acquisition of a novel tracing task. The goal of this experiment was to further investigate the interactive effects of pain stimulus location on motor learning acquisition, retention, and sensorimotor processing. Three groups of twelve participants (n = 36) were randomly assigned to either a local capsaicin group, remote capsaicin group or contralateral capsaicin group. SEPs were collected at baseline, post-application of capsaicin cream, and following a motor learning task. Participants performed a motor tracing acquisition task followed by a pain-free retention task 24–48 h later while accuracy data was recorded. The P25 (p < 0.001) SEP peak significantly decreased following capsaicin application for all groups. Following motor learning acquisition, the N18 SEP peak decreased for the remote capsaicin group (p = 0.02) while the N30 (p = 0.002) SEP peaks increased significantly following motor learning acquisition for all groups. The local, remote and contralateral capsaicin groups improved in accuracy following motor learning (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between the groups. Early SEP alterations are markers of the neuroplasticity that accompanies acute pain and motor learning acquisition. Improved motor learning while in acute pain may be due to an increase in arousal, as opposed to increased attention to the limb performing the task.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/8/10/179somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)motor learningremote painlocal pain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erin Dancey
Paul Yielder
Bernadette Murphy
spellingShingle Erin Dancey
Paul Yielder
Bernadette Murphy
Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?
Brain Sciences
somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)
motor learning
remote pain
local pain
author_facet Erin Dancey
Paul Yielder
Bernadette Murphy
author_sort Erin Dancey
title Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?
title_short Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?
title_full Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?
title_fullStr Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?
title_full_unstemmed Does Location of Tonic Pain Differentially Impact Motor Learning and Sensorimotor Integration?
title_sort does location of tonic pain differentially impact motor learning and sensorimotor integration?
publisher MDPI AG
series Brain Sciences
issn 2076-3425
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Recent work found that experimental pain appeared to negate alterations in cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) that occurred in response to motor learning acquisition of a novel tracing task. The goal of this experiment was to further investigate the interactive effects of pain stimulus location on motor learning acquisition, retention, and sensorimotor processing. Three groups of twelve participants (n = 36) were randomly assigned to either a local capsaicin group, remote capsaicin group or contralateral capsaicin group. SEPs were collected at baseline, post-application of capsaicin cream, and following a motor learning task. Participants performed a motor tracing acquisition task followed by a pain-free retention task 24–48 h later while accuracy data was recorded. The P25 (p < 0.001) SEP peak significantly decreased following capsaicin application for all groups. Following motor learning acquisition, the N18 SEP peak decreased for the remote capsaicin group (p = 0.02) while the N30 (p = 0.002) SEP peaks increased significantly following motor learning acquisition for all groups. The local, remote and contralateral capsaicin groups improved in accuracy following motor learning (p < 0.001) with no significant differences between the groups. Early SEP alterations are markers of the neuroplasticity that accompanies acute pain and motor learning acquisition. Improved motor learning while in acute pain may be due to an increase in arousal, as opposed to increased attention to the limb performing the task.
topic somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)
motor learning
remote pain
local pain
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/8/10/179
work_keys_str_mv AT erindancey doeslocationoftonicpaindifferentiallyimpactmotorlearningandsensorimotorintegration
AT paulyielder doeslocationoftonicpaindifferentiallyimpactmotorlearningandsensorimotorintegration
AT bernadettemurphy doeslocationoftonicpaindifferentiallyimpactmotorlearningandsensorimotorintegration
_version_ 1725900069285134336