Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology

The paper presents and discusses Bourdieu's perspective on the relationship between observer and observed. The term 'symbolic violence' will also be discussed, as it is an inevitable element of this relationship. The discussion starts from the assumption that scientific thinking itsel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teodorski Marko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia 2009-01-01
Series:Sociologija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2009/0038-03180904385T.pdf
id doaj-6d9b7fcafac44446a4196a35ba01124c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d9b7fcafac44446a4196a35ba01124c2020-11-25T03:49:29ZengSociological Scientific Society of SerbiaSociologija0038-03182009-01-0151438539710.2298/SOC0904385TLimites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeologyTeodorski MarkoThe paper presents and discusses Bourdieu's perspective on the relationship between observer and observed. The term 'symbolic violence' will also be discussed, as it is an inevitable element of this relationship. The discussion starts from the assumption that scientific thinking itself engages in a particular process of construction of its object, so that the researcher inevitably 'transfers' him or herself into the observed object. Following Bourdieu, I would like to specify this distortion, this inequality in positions, as 'symbolic violence' and to expound some of the questions that revolve around this term. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2009/0038-03180904385T.pdfsymbolic violencetransfer into the otherresearcher and objectdouble objectivationrealist construction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Teodorski Marko
spellingShingle Teodorski Marko
Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
Sociologija
symbolic violence
transfer into the other
researcher and object
double objectivation
realist construction
author_facet Teodorski Marko
author_sort Teodorski Marko
title Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
title_short Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
title_full Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
title_fullStr Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
title_full_unstemmed Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
title_sort limites ingenii definire: bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
publisher Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia
series Sociologija
issn 0038-0318
publishDate 2009-01-01
description The paper presents and discusses Bourdieu's perspective on the relationship between observer and observed. The term 'symbolic violence' will also be discussed, as it is an inevitable element of this relationship. The discussion starts from the assumption that scientific thinking itself engages in a particular process of construction of its object, so that the researcher inevitably 'transfers' him or herself into the observed object. Following Bourdieu, I would like to specify this distortion, this inequality in positions, as 'symbolic violence' and to expound some of the questions that revolve around this term.
topic symbolic violence
transfer into the other
researcher and object
double objectivation
realist construction
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2009/0038-03180904385T.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT teodorskimarko limitesingeniidefinirebourdieusepistemologicalquestionanditssignificanceforarchaeology
_version_ 1724495183932817408