Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology
The paper presents and discusses Bourdieu's perspective on the relationship between observer and observed. The term 'symbolic violence' will also be discussed, as it is an inevitable element of this relationship. The discussion starts from the assumption that scientific thinking itsel...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia
2009-01-01
|
Series: | Sociologija |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2009/0038-03180904385T.pdf |
id |
doaj-6d9b7fcafac44446a4196a35ba01124c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6d9b7fcafac44446a4196a35ba01124c2020-11-25T03:49:29ZengSociological Scientific Society of SerbiaSociologija0038-03182009-01-0151438539710.2298/SOC0904385TLimites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeologyTeodorski MarkoThe paper presents and discusses Bourdieu's perspective on the relationship between observer and observed. The term 'symbolic violence' will also be discussed, as it is an inevitable element of this relationship. The discussion starts from the assumption that scientific thinking itself engages in a particular process of construction of its object, so that the researcher inevitably 'transfers' him or herself into the observed object. Following Bourdieu, I would like to specify this distortion, this inequality in positions, as 'symbolic violence' and to expound some of the questions that revolve around this term. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2009/0038-03180904385T.pdfsymbolic violencetransfer into the otherresearcher and objectdouble objectivationrealist construction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Teodorski Marko |
spellingShingle |
Teodorski Marko Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology Sociologija symbolic violence transfer into the other researcher and object double objectivation realist construction |
author_facet |
Teodorski Marko |
author_sort |
Teodorski Marko |
title |
Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology |
title_short |
Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology |
title_full |
Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology |
title_fullStr |
Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Limites ingenii definire: Bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology |
title_sort |
limites ingenii definire: bourdieu's epistemological question and its significance for archaeology |
publisher |
Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia |
series |
Sociologija |
issn |
0038-0318 |
publishDate |
2009-01-01 |
description |
The paper presents and discusses Bourdieu's perspective on the relationship between observer and observed. The term 'symbolic violence' will also be discussed, as it is an inevitable element of this relationship. The discussion starts from the assumption that scientific thinking itself engages in a particular process of construction of its object, so that the researcher inevitably 'transfers' him or herself into the observed object. Following Bourdieu, I would like to specify this distortion, this inequality in positions, as 'symbolic violence' and to expound some of the questions that revolve around this term. |
topic |
symbolic violence transfer into the other researcher and object double objectivation realist construction |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0038-0318/2009/0038-03180904385T.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT teodorskimarko limitesingeniidefinirebourdieusepistemologicalquestionanditssignificanceforarchaeology |
_version_ |
1724495183932817408 |