The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual Task

The current study explored the influence of confidence rating on visual acuity. We used brief exposures of the Landolt gap discrimination task, probing the primary visual ability to detect contrast. During 200 practice trials, participants in the Confidence Rating group rated their response-confiden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taly Bonder, Daniel Gopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02674/full
id doaj-6d86f2d279764e94911435740b942452
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d86f2d279764e94911435740b9424522020-11-25T02:39:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-11-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.02674471338The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual TaskTaly BonderDaniel GopherThe current study explored the influence of confidence rating on visual acuity. We used brief exposures of the Landolt gap discrimination task, probing the primary visual ability to detect contrast. During 200 practice trials, participants in the Confidence Rating group rated their response-confidence in each trial. A second (Time Delay) group received a short break at the end of each trial, equivalent to the average rating response time of the Confidence Rating group. The third (Standard Task) group performed the Landolt gap task in its original form. During practice, the Confidence Rating group developed an efficient monitoring ability indicated by a significant correlation between accuracy and confidence rating and a moderate calibration index score. Following practice, all groups performed 400 identical test trials of the standard Landolt gap task. In the test trials, the Confidence Rating group responded more accurately than the control groups, though it did not differ from them in response time for correct answers. Remarkably, the Confidence Rating group was significantly slower when making errors, compared the control groups. An interaction in learning efficiency occurred: the Confidence Rating group significantly improved its reaction times after the initial practice, as compared to both control groups. The findings demonstrate an effect of confidence rating on the formation of processing and response strategies, which granted participants significant benefits in later performance.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02674/fullconfidence ratingexecutive controlvisual acuitytask formationspatial attentionreactivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taly Bonder
Daniel Gopher
spellingShingle Taly Bonder
Daniel Gopher
The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual Task
Frontiers in Psychology
confidence rating
executive control
visual acuity
task formation
spatial attention
reactivity
author_facet Taly Bonder
Daniel Gopher
author_sort Taly Bonder
title The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual Task
title_short The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual Task
title_full The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual Task
title_fullStr The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual Task
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Confidence Rating on a Primary Visual Task
title_sort effect of confidence rating on a primary visual task
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The current study explored the influence of confidence rating on visual acuity. We used brief exposures of the Landolt gap discrimination task, probing the primary visual ability to detect contrast. During 200 practice trials, participants in the Confidence Rating group rated their response-confidence in each trial. A second (Time Delay) group received a short break at the end of each trial, equivalent to the average rating response time of the Confidence Rating group. The third (Standard Task) group performed the Landolt gap task in its original form. During practice, the Confidence Rating group developed an efficient monitoring ability indicated by a significant correlation between accuracy and confidence rating and a moderate calibration index score. Following practice, all groups performed 400 identical test trials of the standard Landolt gap task. In the test trials, the Confidence Rating group responded more accurately than the control groups, though it did not differ from them in response time for correct answers. Remarkably, the Confidence Rating group was significantly slower when making errors, compared the control groups. An interaction in learning efficiency occurred: the Confidence Rating group significantly improved its reaction times after the initial practice, as compared to both control groups. The findings demonstrate an effect of confidence rating on the formation of processing and response strategies, which granted participants significant benefits in later performance.
topic confidence rating
executive control
visual acuity
task formation
spatial attention
reactivity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02674/full
work_keys_str_mv AT talybonder theeffectofconfidenceratingonaprimaryvisualtask
AT danielgopher theeffectofconfidenceratingonaprimaryvisualtask
AT talybonder effectofconfidenceratingonaprimaryvisualtask
AT danielgopher effectofconfidenceratingonaprimaryvisualtask
_version_ 1724783806163976192