The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent Decades
This article only looks at France, and even within this narrow framework it does not pretend to be exhaustive. Several well-known authors have marked the way we think about disability. Goffman for example, with his sociology of interaction, provided a theory and stimulated research on the representa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Stockholm University Press
2007-11-01
|
Series: | Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research |
Online Access: | https://www.sjdr.se/articles/261 |
id |
doaj-6d6336a6176e4254b671468f87426cd9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6d6336a6176e4254b671468f87426cd92020-11-24T22:40:14ZengStockholm University PressScandinavian Journal of Disability Research1501-74191745-30112007-11-0193-414615910.1080/15017410701680753191The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent DecadesHenri-Jacques Stiker0“Identités, Cultures, Territories” Laboratory, Université Denis Diderot, Paris, FranceThis article only looks at France, and even within this narrow framework it does not pretend to be exhaustive. Several well-known authors have marked the way we think about disability. Goffman for example, with his sociology of interaction, provided a theory and stimulated research on the representations and analysis of institutions. By reconstituting the history of madness, Michel Foucault and Robert Castel legitimized the analysis of disability as a field of research and as a privileged locus of exclusion. As a counterpoint to Foucault, Marcel Gauchet revealed the difficult but necessary democratic requirement for inclusion. In addition to existing contributions, it is therefore necessary to highlight that which has not yet been mobilized. For example, Georges Canguilhem's reflection on the relationship between the living and the life milieu; Foucault's notion of “pastoral power” for an analysis of associations; Freud's concept of “uncanny”, which deserves greater attention than that which it has already received. Succinctly put, the area of disability in France would have a great future, if it were given the resources.https://www.sjdr.se/articles/261 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Henri-Jacques Stiker |
spellingShingle |
Henri-Jacques Stiker The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent Decades Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research |
author_facet |
Henri-Jacques Stiker |
author_sort |
Henri-Jacques Stiker |
title |
The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent Decades |
title_short |
The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent Decades |
title_full |
The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent Decades |
title_fullStr |
The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent Decades |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Contribution of Human Sciences to the Field of Disability in France over Recent Decades |
title_sort |
contribution of human sciences to the field of disability in france over recent decades |
publisher |
Stockholm University Press |
series |
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research |
issn |
1501-7419 1745-3011 |
publishDate |
2007-11-01 |
description |
This article only looks at France, and even within this narrow framework it does not pretend to be exhaustive. Several well-known authors have marked the way we think about disability. Goffman for example, with his sociology of interaction, provided a theory and stimulated research on the representations and analysis of institutions. By reconstituting the history of madness, Michel Foucault and Robert Castel legitimized the analysis of disability as a field of research and as a privileged locus of exclusion. As a counterpoint to Foucault, Marcel Gauchet revealed the difficult but necessary democratic requirement for inclusion. In addition to existing contributions, it is therefore necessary to highlight that which has not yet been mobilized. For example, Georges Canguilhem's reflection on the relationship between the living and the life milieu; Foucault's notion of “pastoral power” for an analysis of associations; Freud's concept of “uncanny”, which deserves greater attention than that which it has already received. Succinctly put, the area of disability in France would have a great future, if it were given the resources. |
url |
https://www.sjdr.se/articles/261 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT henrijacquesstiker thecontributionofhumansciencestothefieldofdisabilityinfranceoverrecentdecades AT henrijacquesstiker contributionofhumansciencestothefieldofdisabilityinfranceoverrecentdecades |
_version_ |
1725705295849586688 |