Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for Differences

This paper presents a three-level oligopoly power producer’s capacity investment game model, whose first level considers optimal regulation policy, and second-level models producer’s capacity investment strategy based on the analysis of power producer’s equilibrium biding strategy with capacity and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinhua Zhang, Hairong Huang, Xiaohua Xia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/654124
id doaj-6d6127068cd34b3dad828c3123d3c15d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d6127068cd34b3dad828c3123d3c15d2020-11-25T00:49:09ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472013-01-01201310.1155/2013/654124654124Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for DifferencesXinhua Zhang0Hairong Huang1Xiaohua Xia2School of Economic and Management, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, ChinaSchool of Economic and Management, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, ChinaInstitute of China’s Economic Reform & Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, ChinaThis paper presents a three-level oligopoly power producer’s capacity investment game model, whose first level considers optimal regulation policy, and second-level models producer’s capacity investment strategy based on the analysis of power producer’s equilibrium biding strategy with capacity and price cap constraints at third level. We solve the model with backward induction and simulate the symmetric case. Precisely, we examine the effect of the number of oligopoly power producers, price cap, and contracts for differences (CFDs) on the unit load and power sale price and explore the optimal investment policy based on the maximization of discounted social welfare. For the proportion of power in CFDs being very big and power supply being relatively nervous in Chinese power market, we discuss the effect of power capacity investment subsidies and CFDs power price on power supply and demand, whose results indicate that reducing the proportion of CFDs’ power in the power producer’s access grid power is an effective way to alleviate the tension in power supply and demand, and the current renewable energy policy can neither necessarily ease the tension condition of power supply nor can it necessarily promote the construction of renewable power generation units.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/654124
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xinhua Zhang
Hairong Huang
Xiaohua Xia
spellingShingle Xinhua Zhang
Hairong Huang
Xiaohua Xia
Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for Differences
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Xinhua Zhang
Hairong Huang
Xiaohua Xia
author_sort Xinhua Zhang
title Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for Differences
title_short Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for Differences
title_full Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for Differences
title_fullStr Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for Differences
title_full_unstemmed Oligopoly Power Producer’s Capacity Investment Model with Contracts for Differences
title_sort oligopoly power producer’s capacity investment model with contracts for differences
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2013-01-01
description This paper presents a three-level oligopoly power producer’s capacity investment game model, whose first level considers optimal regulation policy, and second-level models producer’s capacity investment strategy based on the analysis of power producer’s equilibrium biding strategy with capacity and price cap constraints at third level. We solve the model with backward induction and simulate the symmetric case. Precisely, we examine the effect of the number of oligopoly power producers, price cap, and contracts for differences (CFDs) on the unit load and power sale price and explore the optimal investment policy based on the maximization of discounted social welfare. For the proportion of power in CFDs being very big and power supply being relatively nervous in Chinese power market, we discuss the effect of power capacity investment subsidies and CFDs power price on power supply and demand, whose results indicate that reducing the proportion of CFDs’ power in the power producer’s access grid power is an effective way to alleviate the tension in power supply and demand, and the current renewable energy policy can neither necessarily ease the tension condition of power supply nor can it necessarily promote the construction of renewable power generation units.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/654124
work_keys_str_mv AT xinhuazhang oligopolypowerproducerscapacityinvestmentmodelwithcontractsfordifferences
AT haironghuang oligopolypowerproducerscapacityinvestmentmodelwithcontractsfordifferences
AT xiaohuaxia oligopolypowerproducerscapacityinvestmentmodelwithcontractsfordifferences
_version_ 1725252639511281664