Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cycles

Objective: The objective of the study was (1) “to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) failure cycles.” And (2) “to compare differences in pregnancy outcome by endometrial scratching in early (D2–D4) and late follicular phases (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leena Wadhwa, Mona Mishra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2018;volume=11;issue=1;spage=59;epage=71;aulast=Wadhwa
id doaj-6d586a5d5f5d4a84be2776e5133b7077
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d586a5d5f5d4a84be2776e5133b70772020-11-25T00:20:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662018-01-01111597110.4103/jhrs.JHRS_130_17Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cyclesLeena WadhwaMona MishraObjective: The objective of the study was (1) “to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) failure cycles.” And (2) “to compare differences in pregnancy outcome by endometrial scratching in early (D2–D4) and late follicular phases (D7–D9) of the same stimulation cycle.” Materials and Methods: Women attending infertility clinic in a tertiary care center and who have two or more repeated COS failure cycles and planned for COS with intrauterine insemination (IUI) were included in the study which is a prospective parallel, interventional, single-blinded, randomized control study, in 1:1 allocation ratio. A total of 165 patients were recruited and randomly allocated into three groups: Group A (n = 55) underwent endometrial scratching on D2–D4 of the same COS cycle, Group B (n = 55) on D7–D9, and Group C (n = 55) no intervention done. All the patients underwent COS according to standard protocol followed by IUI. Results: Clinical pregnancy rate was 12.73% (odds ratio [OR] =0.87 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.288–2.55, P = 1), 16.36% (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.40–3.23, P = 1), and 14.54%, respectively, in Group A, B, and C, respectively (P = 0.86), as per intention to treat analysis. Using Chi-square test, P value between Group A and B was 0.787, between Group A and C was 1.000, and between Group B and C was 1.000. As per protocol analysis, clinical pregnancy rate was 13.46% (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.27–2.5, P = 0.74), 19.57% (OR = 1.3 95%; CI = 0.45–3.73, P = 0.41), and 15.69%. Using Chi-square test, P value between Group A and B was 0.588, between Group A and C was 0.967, and between Group B and C was 0.815. No abortions and multiple pregnancies occurred in either of the groups. Conclusion: The effect found was of good quantum in Group B as per protocol analysis which could be of clinical relevance if larger sample size would have been taken. Endometrial scratching is a cost-effective and easy technique which may improve clinical pregnancy rates in previous COS failure cycles, but more trials are needed to be conducted using larger sample size to achieve the improved and significant outcome.http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2018;volume=11;issue=1;spage=59;epage=71;aulast=WadhwaControlled ovarian stimulationendometrial scratchingintrauterine insemination
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leena Wadhwa
Mona Mishra
spellingShingle Leena Wadhwa
Mona Mishra
Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cycles
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Controlled ovarian stimulation
endometrial scratching
intrauterine insemination
author_facet Leena Wadhwa
Mona Mishra
author_sort Leena Wadhwa
title Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cycles
title_short Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cycles
title_full Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cycles
title_fullStr Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cycles
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) failure cycles
title_sort therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated controlled ovarian stimulation (cos) failure cycles
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Objective: The objective of the study was (1) “to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of endometrial scratching in repeated controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) failure cycles.” And (2) “to compare differences in pregnancy outcome by endometrial scratching in early (D2–D4) and late follicular phases (D7–D9) of the same stimulation cycle.” Materials and Methods: Women attending infertility clinic in a tertiary care center and who have two or more repeated COS failure cycles and planned for COS with intrauterine insemination (IUI) were included in the study which is a prospective parallel, interventional, single-blinded, randomized control study, in 1:1 allocation ratio. A total of 165 patients were recruited and randomly allocated into three groups: Group A (n = 55) underwent endometrial scratching on D2–D4 of the same COS cycle, Group B (n = 55) on D7–D9, and Group C (n = 55) no intervention done. All the patients underwent COS according to standard protocol followed by IUI. Results: Clinical pregnancy rate was 12.73% (odds ratio [OR] =0.87 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.288–2.55, P = 1), 16.36% (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.40–3.23, P = 1), and 14.54%, respectively, in Group A, B, and C, respectively (P = 0.86), as per intention to treat analysis. Using Chi-square test, P value between Group A and B was 0.787, between Group A and C was 1.000, and between Group B and C was 1.000. As per protocol analysis, clinical pregnancy rate was 13.46% (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.27–2.5, P = 0.74), 19.57% (OR = 1.3 95%; CI = 0.45–3.73, P = 0.41), and 15.69%. Using Chi-square test, P value between Group A and B was 0.588, between Group A and C was 0.967, and between Group B and C was 0.815. No abortions and multiple pregnancies occurred in either of the groups. Conclusion: The effect found was of good quantum in Group B as per protocol analysis which could be of clinical relevance if larger sample size would have been taken. Endometrial scratching is a cost-effective and easy technique which may improve clinical pregnancy rates in previous COS failure cycles, but more trials are needed to be conducted using larger sample size to achieve the improved and significant outcome.
topic Controlled ovarian stimulation
endometrial scratching
intrauterine insemination
url http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2018;volume=11;issue=1;spage=59;epage=71;aulast=Wadhwa
work_keys_str_mv AT leenawadhwa therapeuticefficacyofendometrialscratchinginrepeatedcontrolledovarianstimulationcosfailurecycles
AT monamishra therapeuticefficacyofendometrialscratchinginrepeatedcontrolledovarianstimulationcosfailurecycles
_version_ 1725368172678217728