In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian spruces

Distribution ranges of spruces, European and Siberian intersect in the Eastern Europe and Urals, forming wide zone of introgressive hybridization where species discrimination is difficult. We applied both molecular (mtDNA and cpDNA sequences) and morphological approaches with goals of e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Volkova, Polina, Shipunov, Alexey, Borisova, Polina, Moseng, Reed, Ivens, Ranelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2014-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1072
id doaj-6d51d62548464edcb6763c4aa07814f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d51d62548464edcb6763c4aa07814f52020-11-25T02:27:47ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752014-01-0148210.14214/sf.1072In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian sprucesVolkova, PolinaShipunov, AlexeyBorisova, PolinaMoseng, ReedIvens, Ranelle Distribution ranges of spruces, European and Siberian intersect in the Eastern Europe and Urals, forming wide zone of introgressive hybridization where species discrimination is difficult. We applied both molecular (mtDNA and cpDNA sequences) and morphological approaches with goals of elucidating the origin of spruces in undisturbed forests of Russian Karelia (considered as part of the abovementioned introgression zone). Karelian spruces have morphology that is typical for and characterized with genetic variation, described previously for . This contradiction between morphology and organellar DNA could be itself an evidence of hybrid origin because morphological data should have a genetic basis. If the genes responsible for the observed morphological differences are nuclear, that explains why we did not see any deviation of Karelian spruces towards in organellar markers. In this situation nuclear gene flow from should be performed via pollen. Thus, we should expect Karelian spruces to have cpDNA haplotypes (inherited paternally in conifers) typical for . However, it is not the case for the majority of plants sampled and requires additional explanation like chloroplast capture in the introgresson zone. In all, we think that Karelian spruces evolved due to introgression between and . However, it is unclear whether Karelian spruces could be treated as , because unequivocal morphological and genetic characters of this hybridogenous species are still absent.Picea abiesP. obovataP. obovataP. abiesP. obovataP. obovataP. obovataP. abiesP. obovataP. fennicahttps://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1072
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Volkova, Polina
Shipunov, Alexey
Borisova, Polina
Moseng, Reed
Ivens, Ranelle
spellingShingle Volkova, Polina
Shipunov, Alexey
Borisova, Polina
Moseng, Reed
Ivens, Ranelle
In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian spruces
Silva Fennica
author_facet Volkova, Polina
Shipunov, Alexey
Borisova, Polina
Moseng, Reed
Ivens, Ranelle
author_sort Volkova, Polina
title In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian spruces
title_short In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian spruces
title_full In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian spruces
title_fullStr In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian spruces
title_full_unstemmed In search of hybridity: the case of Karelian spruces
title_sort in search of hybridity: the case of karelian spruces
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Distribution ranges of spruces, European and Siberian intersect in the Eastern Europe and Urals, forming wide zone of introgressive hybridization where species discrimination is difficult. We applied both molecular (mtDNA and cpDNA sequences) and morphological approaches with goals of elucidating the origin of spruces in undisturbed forests of Russian Karelia (considered as part of the abovementioned introgression zone). Karelian spruces have morphology that is typical for and characterized with genetic variation, described previously for . This contradiction between morphology and organellar DNA could be itself an evidence of hybrid origin because morphological data should have a genetic basis. If the genes responsible for the observed morphological differences are nuclear, that explains why we did not see any deviation of Karelian spruces towards in organellar markers. In this situation nuclear gene flow from should be performed via pollen. Thus, we should expect Karelian spruces to have cpDNA haplotypes (inherited paternally in conifers) typical for . However, it is not the case for the majority of plants sampled and requires additional explanation like chloroplast capture in the introgresson zone. In all, we think that Karelian spruces evolved due to introgression between and . However, it is unclear whether Karelian spruces could be treated as , because unequivocal morphological and genetic characters of this hybridogenous species are still absent.Picea abiesP. obovataP. obovataP. abiesP. obovataP. obovataP. obovataP. abiesP. obovataP. fennica
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/1072
work_keys_str_mv AT volkovapolina insearchofhybriditythecaseofkarelianspruces
AT shipunovalexey insearchofhybriditythecaseofkarelianspruces
AT borisovapolina insearchofhybriditythecaseofkarelianspruces
AT mosengreed insearchofhybriditythecaseofkarelianspruces
AT ivensranelle insearchofhybriditythecaseofkarelianspruces
_version_ 1724840865827913728