The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical Models

Neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII (fVIII), referred to as “inhibitors,” remain the most challenging complication post-fVIII replacement therapy. Preclinical development of novel fVIII products involves studies incorporating hemophilia A (HA) and wild-type animal models. Though immunogenicity is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seema R. Patel, Taran S. Lundgren, H. Trent Spencer, Christopher B. Doering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00494/full
id doaj-6d51a5d92425473fac5229032f60f244
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d51a5d92425473fac5229032f60f2442020-11-25T02:27:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242020-04-011110.3389/fimmu.2020.00494521124The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical ModelsSeema R. Patel0Taran S. Lundgren1Taran S. Lundgren2H. Trent Spencer3Christopher B. Doering4Hemostasis and Thrombosis Program, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United StatesCell and Gene Therapy Program, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United StatesGraduate Program in Molecular and Systems Pharmacology, Laney Graduate School, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United StatesCell and Gene Therapy Program, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United StatesCell and Gene Therapy Program, Department of Pediatrics, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United StatesNeutralizing antibodies to factor VIII (fVIII), referred to as “inhibitors,” remain the most challenging complication post-fVIII replacement therapy. Preclinical development of novel fVIII products involves studies incorporating hemophilia A (HA) and wild-type animal models. Though immunogenicity is a critical aspect of preclinical pharmacology studies, gene therapy studies tend to focus on fVIII expression levels without major consideration for immunogenicity. Therefore, little clarity exists on whether preclinical testing can be predictive of clinical immunogenicity risk. Despite this, but perhaps due to the potential for transformative benefits, clinical gene therapy trials have progressed rapidly. In more than two decades, no inhibitors have been observed. However, all trials are conducted in previously treated patients without a history of inhibitors. The current review thus focuses on our understanding of preclinical immunogenicity for HA gene therapy candidates and the potential indication for inhibitor treatment, with a focus on product- and platform-specific determinants, including fVIII transgene sequence composition and tissue/vector biodistribution. Currently, the two leading clinical gene therapy vectors are adeno-associated viral (AAV) and lentiviral (LV) vectors. For HA applications, AAV vectors are liver-tropic and employ synthetic, high-expressing, liver-specific promoters. Factors including vector serotype and biodistribution, transcriptional regulatory elements, transgene sequence, dosing, liver immunoprivilege, and host immune status may contribute to tipping the scale between immunogenicity and tolerance. Many of these factors can also be important in delivery of LV-fVIII gene therapy, especially when delivered intravenously for liver-directed fVIII expression. However, ex vivo LV-fVIII targeting and transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) has been demonstrated to achieve durable and curative fVIII production without inhibitor development in preclinical models. A critical variable appears to be pre-transplantation conditioning regimens that suppress and/or ablate T cells. Additionally, we and others have demonstrated the potential of LV-fVIII HSPC and liver-directed AAV-fVIII gene therapy to eradicate pre-existing inhibitors in murine and canine models of HA, respectively. Future preclinical studies will be essential to elucidate immune mechanism(s) at play in the context of gene therapy for HA, as well as strategies for preventing adverse immune responses and promoting immune tolerance even in the setting of pre-existing inhibitors.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00494/fullgene therapyhemophilia Ainhibitorslentiviral (LV) vectoradeno-associated viral vectorshematopoietic (stem) cells
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seema R. Patel
Taran S. Lundgren
Taran S. Lundgren
H. Trent Spencer
Christopher B. Doering
spellingShingle Seema R. Patel
Taran S. Lundgren
Taran S. Lundgren
H. Trent Spencer
Christopher B. Doering
The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical Models
Frontiers in Immunology
gene therapy
hemophilia A
inhibitors
lentiviral (LV) vector
adeno-associated viral vectors
hematopoietic (stem) cells
author_facet Seema R. Patel
Taran S. Lundgren
Taran S. Lundgren
H. Trent Spencer
Christopher B. Doering
author_sort Seema R. Patel
title The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical Models
title_short The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical Models
title_full The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical Models
title_fullStr The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical Models
title_full_unstemmed The Immune Response to the fVIII Gene Therapy in Preclinical Models
title_sort immune response to the fviii gene therapy in preclinical models
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Immunology
issn 1664-3224
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII (fVIII), referred to as “inhibitors,” remain the most challenging complication post-fVIII replacement therapy. Preclinical development of novel fVIII products involves studies incorporating hemophilia A (HA) and wild-type animal models. Though immunogenicity is a critical aspect of preclinical pharmacology studies, gene therapy studies tend to focus on fVIII expression levels without major consideration for immunogenicity. Therefore, little clarity exists on whether preclinical testing can be predictive of clinical immunogenicity risk. Despite this, but perhaps due to the potential for transformative benefits, clinical gene therapy trials have progressed rapidly. In more than two decades, no inhibitors have been observed. However, all trials are conducted in previously treated patients without a history of inhibitors. The current review thus focuses on our understanding of preclinical immunogenicity for HA gene therapy candidates and the potential indication for inhibitor treatment, with a focus on product- and platform-specific determinants, including fVIII transgene sequence composition and tissue/vector biodistribution. Currently, the two leading clinical gene therapy vectors are adeno-associated viral (AAV) and lentiviral (LV) vectors. For HA applications, AAV vectors are liver-tropic and employ synthetic, high-expressing, liver-specific promoters. Factors including vector serotype and biodistribution, transcriptional regulatory elements, transgene sequence, dosing, liver immunoprivilege, and host immune status may contribute to tipping the scale between immunogenicity and tolerance. Many of these factors can also be important in delivery of LV-fVIII gene therapy, especially when delivered intravenously for liver-directed fVIII expression. However, ex vivo LV-fVIII targeting and transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) has been demonstrated to achieve durable and curative fVIII production without inhibitor development in preclinical models. A critical variable appears to be pre-transplantation conditioning regimens that suppress and/or ablate T cells. Additionally, we and others have demonstrated the potential of LV-fVIII HSPC and liver-directed AAV-fVIII gene therapy to eradicate pre-existing inhibitors in murine and canine models of HA, respectively. Future preclinical studies will be essential to elucidate immune mechanism(s) at play in the context of gene therapy for HA, as well as strategies for preventing adverse immune responses and promoting immune tolerance even in the setting of pre-existing inhibitors.
topic gene therapy
hemophilia A
inhibitors
lentiviral (LV) vector
adeno-associated viral vectors
hematopoietic (stem) cells
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00494/full
work_keys_str_mv AT seemarpatel theimmuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT taranslundgren theimmuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT taranslundgren theimmuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT htrentspencer theimmuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT christopherbdoering theimmuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT seemarpatel immuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT taranslundgren immuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT taranslundgren immuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT htrentspencer immuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
AT christopherbdoering immuneresponsetothefviiigenetherapyinpreclinicalmodels
_version_ 1724844335889907712