KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD
İbn Ruchd is one of the important readers and commnetators of Aristotelian philosophicalclassical books. This study, firstly, aims to explain that why Aristotle's De Anima is perceivedas one of main classical book regarding psychology by Muslim philosophers. De Animadetermines basic subjects an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
Sakarya University
2005-12-01
|
Series: | Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dergipark.gov.tr/sakaifd/issue/20609/219620?publisher=sakarya |
id |
doaj-6d349dd8920142519bca84297057a7b3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6d349dd8920142519bca84297057a7b32020-11-25T02:58:48ZaraSakarya UniversitySakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi2146-98061304-65352005-12-0171212310.17335/suifd.5145828KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞDAtilla ARKANİbn Ruchd is one of the important readers and commnetators of Aristotelian philosophicalclassical books. This study, firstly, aims to explain that why Aristotle's De Anima is perceivedas one of main classical book regarding psychology by Muslim philosophers. De Animadetermines basic subjects and problems of psychology and builds explatanory concepts andtheories within logical consistency. Beside that De Anima tries to solve the main problems ofhuman beings such as the meaning of life, freedom, justice and happines. Further, for IbnRuchd, Aristotelian philosophical literature gives the opportunity to establish an harmoniousand consistent human understanding. As a part of this literature, De Anima plays an essentialrole in constructing the relations among God, the nature and human beings.Ibn Ruchd's three commentaries on De Anima are different attemps and examples ofunderstanding and commenting. Therefore, this study tries to determine the characteristicsof these commentaries from the perspective of writing gender and evaluation. Finally thisstudy tries to determine the techniques of Ibn Ruchd which he uses in his commentaries,and general principles which he considers very seriously. Considering these generalprinciples, some of the differences between Aristotle and Ibn Ruchd may be undersoodvery well.http://dergipark.gov.tr/sakaifd/issue/20609/219620?publisher=sakaryaAverroesClassicsCommentaryDe AnimaAristotle-İbn Rüşd Klasik Şerh De Anima (Kitabü’n-nefs) Aristo |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Arabic |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Atilla ARKAN |
spellingShingle |
Atilla ARKAN KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Averroes Classics Commentary De Anima Aristotle - İbn Rüşd Klasik Şerh De Anima (Kitabü’n-nefs) Aristo |
author_facet |
Atilla ARKAN |
author_sort |
Atilla ARKAN |
title |
KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD |
title_short |
KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD |
title_full |
KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD |
title_fullStr |
KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD |
title_full_unstemmed |
KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD |
title_sort |
klasi̇k eser [de ani̇ma] okuyucusu ve şari̇hi̇ olarak i̇bn rüşd |
publisher |
Sakarya University |
series |
Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi |
issn |
2146-9806 1304-6535 |
publishDate |
2005-12-01 |
description |
İbn Ruchd is one of the important readers and commnetators of Aristotelian philosophicalclassical books. This study, firstly, aims to explain that why Aristotle's De Anima is perceivedas one of main classical book regarding psychology by Muslim philosophers. De Animadetermines basic subjects and problems of psychology and builds explatanory concepts andtheories within logical consistency. Beside that De Anima tries to solve the main problems ofhuman beings such as the meaning of life, freedom, justice and happines. Further, for IbnRuchd, Aristotelian philosophical literature gives the opportunity to establish an harmoniousand consistent human understanding. As a part of this literature, De Anima plays an essentialrole in constructing the relations among God, the nature and human beings.Ibn Ruchd's three commentaries on De Anima are different attemps and examples ofunderstanding and commenting. Therefore, this study tries to determine the characteristicsof these commentaries from the perspective of writing gender and evaluation. Finally thisstudy tries to determine the techniques of Ibn Ruchd which he uses in his commentaries,and general principles which he considers very seriously. Considering these generalprinciples, some of the differences between Aristotle and Ibn Ruchd may be undersoodvery well. |
topic |
Averroes Classics Commentary De Anima Aristotle - İbn Rüşd Klasik Şerh De Anima (Kitabü’n-nefs) Aristo |
url |
http://dergipark.gov.tr/sakaifd/issue/20609/219620?publisher=sakarya |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT atillaarkan klasikeserdeanimaokuyucusuvesarihiolarakibnrusd |
_version_ |
1724705091571679232 |