KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD

İbn Ruchd is one of the important readers and commnetators of Aristotelian philosophicalclassical books. This study, firstly, aims to explain that why Aristotle's De Anima is perceivedas one of main classical book regarding psychology by Muslim philosophers. De Animadetermines basic subjects an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Atilla ARKAN
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Sakarya University 2005-12-01
Series:Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
-
Online Access:http://dergipark.gov.tr/sakaifd/issue/20609/219620?publisher=sakarya
id doaj-6d349dd8920142519bca84297057a7b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d349dd8920142519bca84297057a7b32020-11-25T02:58:48ZaraSakarya UniversitySakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi2146-98061304-65352005-12-0171212310.17335/suifd.5145828KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞDAtilla ARKANİbn Ruchd is one of the important readers and commnetators of Aristotelian philosophicalclassical books. This study, firstly, aims to explain that why Aristotle's De Anima is perceivedas one of main classical book regarding psychology by Muslim philosophers. De Animadetermines basic subjects and problems of psychology and builds explatanory concepts andtheories within logical consistency. Beside that De Anima tries to solve the main problems ofhuman beings such as the meaning of life, freedom, justice and happines. Further, for IbnRuchd, Aristotelian philosophical literature gives the opportunity to establish an harmoniousand consistent human understanding. As a part of this literature, De Anima plays an essentialrole in constructing the relations among God, the nature and human beings.Ibn Ruchd's three commentaries on De Anima are different attemps and examples ofunderstanding and commenting. Therefore, this study tries to determine the characteristicsof these commentaries from the perspective of writing gender and evaluation. Finally thisstudy tries to determine the techniques of Ibn Ruchd which he uses in his commentaries,and general principles which he considers very seriously. Considering these generalprinciples, some of the differences between Aristotle and Ibn Ruchd may be undersoodvery well.http://dergipark.gov.tr/sakaifd/issue/20609/219620?publisher=sakaryaAverroesClassicsCommentaryDe AnimaAristotle-İbn Rüşd Klasik Şerh De Anima (Kitabü’n-nefs) Aristo
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Atilla ARKAN
spellingShingle Atilla ARKAN
KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD
Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Averroes
Classics
Commentary
De Anima
Aristotle
-
İbn Rüşd
Klasik
Şerh
De Anima (Kitabü’n-nefs)
Aristo
author_facet Atilla ARKAN
author_sort Atilla ARKAN
title KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD
title_short KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD
title_full KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD
title_fullStr KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD
title_full_unstemmed KLASİK ESER [DE ANİMA] OKUYUCUSU VE ŞARİHİ OLARAK İBN RÜŞD
title_sort klasi̇k eser [de ani̇ma] okuyucusu ve şari̇hi̇ olarak i̇bn rüşd
publisher Sakarya University
series Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
issn 2146-9806
1304-6535
publishDate 2005-12-01
description İbn Ruchd is one of the important readers and commnetators of Aristotelian philosophicalclassical books. This study, firstly, aims to explain that why Aristotle's De Anima is perceivedas one of main classical book regarding psychology by Muslim philosophers. De Animadetermines basic subjects and problems of psychology and builds explatanory concepts andtheories within logical consistency. Beside that De Anima tries to solve the main problems ofhuman beings such as the meaning of life, freedom, justice and happines. Further, for IbnRuchd, Aristotelian philosophical literature gives the opportunity to establish an harmoniousand consistent human understanding. As a part of this literature, De Anima plays an essentialrole in constructing the relations among God, the nature and human beings.Ibn Ruchd's three commentaries on De Anima are different attemps and examples ofunderstanding and commenting. Therefore, this study tries to determine the characteristicsof these commentaries from the perspective of writing gender and evaluation. Finally thisstudy tries to determine the techniques of Ibn Ruchd which he uses in his commentaries,and general principles which he considers very seriously. Considering these generalprinciples, some of the differences between Aristotle and Ibn Ruchd may be undersoodvery well.
topic Averroes
Classics
Commentary
De Anima
Aristotle
-
İbn Rüşd
Klasik
Şerh
De Anima (Kitabü’n-nefs)
Aristo
url http://dergipark.gov.tr/sakaifd/issue/20609/219620?publisher=sakarya
work_keys_str_mv AT atillaarkan klasikeserdeanimaokuyucusuvesarihiolarakibnrusd
_version_ 1724705091571679232