A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory

This essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suzi Adams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2019-09-01
Series:Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/465
id doaj-6d26c8d1f53c4749b69845d02a940ba3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6d26c8d1f53c4749b69845d02a940ba32020-11-25T03:45:02ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghÉtudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies2156-78082019-09-0110111212410.5195/errs.2019.465226A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural MemorySuzi Adams0Flinders UniversityThis essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning and rethinking the meaning of classical antiquity for contemporary worlds, on the one hand, that is linked to an important critical aspect as a counterweight to the flattening effects of modernity, on the other. In the latter, cultural memory expands the reach of the classical heritage, and, in addition to retroaction, further modes of orientation, such as relations of depth and breadth, are delineated. At first glance, cultural memory, in Ricœur’s sense, appears to be embodied in the singular, albeit generalized self. Yet, in reconstructing its meaning, the essay argues that Ricœur’s articulation of cultural memory relies on an implicit collective dimension. The present essay’s hermeneutic reconstruction of Ricœur’s notion of cultural memory comprises a preliminary step of a broader project that aims to rearticulate Jan and Aleida Assmann’s cultural memory framework along social imaginary lines. In this vein, the essay concludes with an overview of the Assmannian approach to cultural memory and considers possible bridges between Ricœur and the Assmanns.http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/465paul ricoeurjan and aleida assmanncultural memorysocial imaginariescollective memorycultures and civilizationssocial theorysociology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suzi Adams
spellingShingle Suzi Adams
A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory
Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
paul ricoeur
jan and aleida assmann
cultural memory
social imaginaries
collective memory
cultures and civilizations
social theory
sociology
author_facet Suzi Adams
author_sort Suzi Adams
title A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory
title_short A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory
title_full A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory
title_fullStr A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory
title_full_unstemmed A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory
title_sort note on ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
issn 2156-7808
publishDate 2019-09-01
description This essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning and rethinking the meaning of classical antiquity for contemporary worlds, on the one hand, that is linked to an important critical aspect as a counterweight to the flattening effects of modernity, on the other. In the latter, cultural memory expands the reach of the classical heritage, and, in addition to retroaction, further modes of orientation, such as relations of depth and breadth, are delineated. At first glance, cultural memory, in Ricœur’s sense, appears to be embodied in the singular, albeit generalized self. Yet, in reconstructing its meaning, the essay argues that Ricœur’s articulation of cultural memory relies on an implicit collective dimension. The present essay’s hermeneutic reconstruction of Ricœur’s notion of cultural memory comprises a preliminary step of a broader project that aims to rearticulate Jan and Aleida Assmann’s cultural memory framework along social imaginary lines. In this vein, the essay concludes with an overview of the Assmannian approach to cultural memory and considers possible bridges between Ricœur and the Assmanns.
topic paul ricoeur
jan and aleida assmann
cultural memory
social imaginaries
collective memory
cultures and civilizations
social theory
sociology
url http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/465
work_keys_str_mv AT suziadams anoteonricœursearlynotionofculturalmemory
AT suziadams noteonricœursearlynotionofculturalmemory
_version_ 1724511894942777344