A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory
This essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/465 |
id |
doaj-6d26c8d1f53c4749b69845d02a940ba3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6d26c8d1f53c4749b69845d02a940ba32020-11-25T03:45:02ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghÉtudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies2156-78082019-09-0110111212410.5195/errs.2019.465226A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural MemorySuzi Adams0Flinders UniversityThis essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning and rethinking the meaning of classical antiquity for contemporary worlds, on the one hand, that is linked to an important critical aspect as a counterweight to the flattening effects of modernity, on the other. In the latter, cultural memory expands the reach of the classical heritage, and, in addition to retroaction, further modes of orientation, such as relations of depth and breadth, are delineated. At first glance, cultural memory, in Ricœur’s sense, appears to be embodied in the singular, albeit generalized self. Yet, in reconstructing its meaning, the essay argues that Ricœur’s articulation of cultural memory relies on an implicit collective dimension. The present essay’s hermeneutic reconstruction of Ricœur’s notion of cultural memory comprises a preliminary step of a broader project that aims to rearticulate Jan and Aleida Assmann’s cultural memory framework along social imaginary lines. In this vein, the essay concludes with an overview of the Assmannian approach to cultural memory and considers possible bridges between Ricœur and the Assmanns.http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/465paul ricoeurjan and aleida assmanncultural memorysocial imaginariescollective memorycultures and civilizationssocial theorysociology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suzi Adams |
spellingShingle |
Suzi Adams A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies paul ricoeur jan and aleida assmann cultural memory social imaginaries collective memory cultures and civilizations social theory sociology |
author_facet |
Suzi Adams |
author_sort |
Suzi Adams |
title |
A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory |
title_short |
A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory |
title_full |
A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory |
title_fullStr |
A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Note on Ricœur’s Early Notion of Cultural Memory |
title_sort |
note on ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory |
publisher |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
series |
Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies |
issn |
2156-7808 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
This essay considers Paul Ricœur’s early notion of cultural memory from 1956-1960. He discusses it in two texts: “What does Humanism Mean?” and the slightly later The Symbolism of Evil. In the former, cultural memory appears as an ongoing and dynamic process of retroaction focussed on questioning and rethinking the meaning of classical antiquity for contemporary worlds, on the one hand, that is linked to an important critical aspect as a counterweight to the flattening effects of modernity, on the other. In the latter, cultural memory expands the reach of the classical heritage, and, in addition to retroaction, further modes of orientation, such as relations of depth and breadth, are delineated. At first glance, cultural memory, in Ricœur’s sense, appears to be embodied in the singular, albeit generalized self. Yet, in reconstructing its meaning, the essay argues that Ricœur’s articulation of cultural memory relies on an implicit collective dimension. The present essay’s hermeneutic reconstruction of Ricœur’s notion of cultural memory comprises a preliminary step of a broader project that aims to rearticulate Jan and Aleida Assmann’s cultural memory framework along social imaginary lines. In this vein, the essay concludes with an overview of the Assmannian approach to cultural memory and considers possible bridges between Ricœur and the Assmanns. |
topic |
paul ricoeur jan and aleida assmann cultural memory social imaginaries collective memory cultures and civilizations social theory sociology |
url |
http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/465 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suziadams anoteonricœursearlynotionofculturalmemory AT suziadams noteonricœursearlynotionofculturalmemory |
_version_ |
1724511894942777344 |