Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial Issue

Background. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has shown to be effective in controlling gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Yet, a universally accepted definition and evaluation for treatment success/failure in GERD is still controversial. The purpose of this paper is to assess if and how the outcome varia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandro Contini, Carmelo Scarpignato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:Minimally Invasive Surgery
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/725472
id doaj-6cfeb50349224877b1e35ff6f633dffe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6cfeb50349224877b1e35ff6f633dffe2020-11-25T00:59:07ZengHindawi LimitedMinimally Invasive Surgery2090-14452090-14532011-01-01201110.1155/2011/725472725472Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial IssueSandro Contini0Carmelo Scarpignato1Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, ItalyLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, ItalyBackground. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has shown to be effective in controlling gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Yet, a universally accepted definition and evaluation for treatment success/failure in GERD is still controversial. The purpose of this paper is to assess if and how the outcome variables used in the different studies could possibly lead to an homogeneous appraisal of the limits and indications of LARS. Methods. We analyzed papers focusing on the efficacy and outcome of LARS and published in English literature over the last 10 years. Results. Symptoms scores and outcome variables reported are dissimilar and not uniform. The most consistent parameter was patient's satisfaction (mean satisfaction rate: 88.9%). Antireflux medications are not a trustworthy outcome index. Endoscopy and esophageal manometry do not appear very helpful. Twenty-four hours pH metry is recommended in patients difficult to manage for recurrent typical symptoms. Conclusions. More uniform symptoms scales and quality of life tools are needed for assessing the clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. In an era of cost containment, objective evaluation tests should be more specifically addressed. Relying on patient's satisfaction may be ambiguous, yet from this study it can be considered a practical and simple tool.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/725472
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandro Contini
Carmelo Scarpignato
spellingShingle Sandro Contini
Carmelo Scarpignato
Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial Issue
Minimally Invasive Surgery
author_facet Sandro Contini
Carmelo Scarpignato
author_sort Sandro Contini
title Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial Issue
title_short Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial Issue
title_full Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial Issue
title_fullStr Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial Issue
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Clinical Outcome after Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Clinical Practice: Still a Controversial Issue
title_sort evaluation of clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in clinical practice: still a controversial issue
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Minimally Invasive Surgery
issn 2090-1445
2090-1453
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has shown to be effective in controlling gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Yet, a universally accepted definition and evaluation for treatment success/failure in GERD is still controversial. The purpose of this paper is to assess if and how the outcome variables used in the different studies could possibly lead to an homogeneous appraisal of the limits and indications of LARS. Methods. We analyzed papers focusing on the efficacy and outcome of LARS and published in English literature over the last 10 years. Results. Symptoms scores and outcome variables reported are dissimilar and not uniform. The most consistent parameter was patient's satisfaction (mean satisfaction rate: 88.9%). Antireflux medications are not a trustworthy outcome index. Endoscopy and esophageal manometry do not appear very helpful. Twenty-four hours pH metry is recommended in patients difficult to manage for recurrent typical symptoms. Conclusions. More uniform symptoms scales and quality of life tools are needed for assessing the clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. In an era of cost containment, objective evaluation tests should be more specifically addressed. Relying on patient's satisfaction may be ambiguous, yet from this study it can be considered a practical and simple tool.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/725472
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrocontini evaluationofclinicaloutcomeafterlaparoscopicantirefluxsurgeryinclinicalpracticestillacontroversialissue
AT carmeloscarpignato evaluationofclinicaloutcomeafterlaparoscopicantirefluxsurgeryinclinicalpracticestillacontroversialissue
_version_ 1725218784244924416