First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary

<p class="Abstract">The present study explores academic vocabulary knowledge, operationalised through the Academic Word List, among first-year higher education students. Both receptive and productive knowledge and the proportion between the two are examined. Results show that while r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Déogratias Nizonkiza
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Stellenbosch University 2016-05-01
Series:Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://spil.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/215
id doaj-6cf4cd5d1797459bb09086b4a81b0005
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6cf4cd5d1797459bb09086b4a81b00052020-11-25T02:58:34ZafrStellenbosch UniversityStellenbosch Papers in Linguistics1027-34172223-99362016-05-0145016918710.5774/45-0-215159First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabularyDéogratias Nizonkiza0School of Languages, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa McGill Community for Lifelong Learning, McGill University, Canada<p class="Abstract">The present study explores academic vocabulary knowledge, operationalised through the Academic Word List, among first-year higher education students. Both receptive and productive knowledge and the proportion between the two are examined. Results show that while receptive knowledge is readily acquired by first-year students, productive knowledge lags behind and remains problematic. This entails that receptive knowledge is much larger than productive knowledge, which confirms earlier indications that receptive vocabulary knowledge is larger than productive knowledge for both academic vocabulary (Zhou 2010) and general vocabulary (cf. Laufer 1998, Webb 2008, among others). Furthermore, results reveal that the ratio between receptive and productive knowledge is slightly above 50%, which lends empirical support to previous findings that the ratio between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge can be anywhere between 50% and 80% (Milton 2009). This finding is extended here to academic vocabulary; complementing Zhou’s (2010) study that investigated the relationship between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge without examining the ratio between them. On the basis of these results, approaches that could potentially contribute to fostering productive knowledge growth are discussed. Avenues worth exploring to gain further insight into the relationship between receptive and productive knowledge are also suggested.</p>http://spil.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/215academic vocabulary, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, collocations, vocabulary dimensions
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Déogratias Nizonkiza
spellingShingle Déogratias Nizonkiza
First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics
academic vocabulary, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, collocations, vocabulary dimensions
author_facet Déogratias Nizonkiza
author_sort Déogratias Nizonkiza
title First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
title_short First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
title_full First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
title_fullStr First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
title_full_unstemmed First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
title_sort first-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
publisher Stellenbosch University
series Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics
issn 1027-3417
2223-9936
publishDate 2016-05-01
description <p class="Abstract">The present study explores academic vocabulary knowledge, operationalised through the Academic Word List, among first-year higher education students. Both receptive and productive knowledge and the proportion between the two are examined. Results show that while receptive knowledge is readily acquired by first-year students, productive knowledge lags behind and remains problematic. This entails that receptive knowledge is much larger than productive knowledge, which confirms earlier indications that receptive vocabulary knowledge is larger than productive knowledge for both academic vocabulary (Zhou 2010) and general vocabulary (cf. Laufer 1998, Webb 2008, among others). Furthermore, results reveal that the ratio between receptive and productive knowledge is slightly above 50%, which lends empirical support to previous findings that the ratio between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge can be anywhere between 50% and 80% (Milton 2009). This finding is extended here to academic vocabulary; complementing Zhou’s (2010) study that investigated the relationship between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge without examining the ratio between them. On the basis of these results, approaches that could potentially contribute to fostering productive knowledge growth are discussed. Avenues worth exploring to gain further insight into the relationship between receptive and productive knowledge are also suggested.</p>
topic academic vocabulary, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, collocations, vocabulary dimensions
url http://spil.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/215
work_keys_str_mv AT deogratiasnizonkiza firstyearuniversitystudentsreceptiveandproductiveuseofacademicvocabulary
_version_ 1724706459343650816