First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary
<p class="Abstract">The present study explores academic vocabulary knowledge, operationalised through the Academic Word List, among first-year higher education students. Both receptive and productive knowledge and the proportion between the two are examined. Results show that while r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Afrikaans |
Published: |
Stellenbosch University
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://spil.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/215 |
id |
doaj-6cf4cd5d1797459bb09086b4a81b0005 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6cf4cd5d1797459bb09086b4a81b00052020-11-25T02:58:34ZafrStellenbosch UniversityStellenbosch Papers in Linguistics1027-34172223-99362016-05-0145016918710.5774/45-0-215159First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabularyDéogratias Nizonkiza0School of Languages, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa McGill Community for Lifelong Learning, McGill University, Canada<p class="Abstract">The present study explores academic vocabulary knowledge, operationalised through the Academic Word List, among first-year higher education students. Both receptive and productive knowledge and the proportion between the two are examined. Results show that while receptive knowledge is readily acquired by first-year students, productive knowledge lags behind and remains problematic. This entails that receptive knowledge is much larger than productive knowledge, which confirms earlier indications that receptive vocabulary knowledge is larger than productive knowledge for both academic vocabulary (Zhou 2010) and general vocabulary (cf. Laufer 1998, Webb 2008, among others). Furthermore, results reveal that the ratio between receptive and productive knowledge is slightly above 50%, which lends empirical support to previous findings that the ratio between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge can be anywhere between 50% and 80% (Milton 2009). This finding is extended here to academic vocabulary; complementing Zhou’s (2010) study that investigated the relationship between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge without examining the ratio between them. On the basis of these results, approaches that could potentially contribute to fostering productive knowledge growth are discussed. Avenues worth exploring to gain further insight into the relationship between receptive and productive knowledge are also suggested.</p>http://spil.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/215academic vocabulary, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, collocations, vocabulary dimensions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Afrikaans |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Déogratias Nizonkiza |
spellingShingle |
Déogratias Nizonkiza First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics academic vocabulary, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, collocations, vocabulary dimensions |
author_facet |
Déogratias Nizonkiza |
author_sort |
Déogratias Nizonkiza |
title |
First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary |
title_short |
First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary |
title_full |
First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary |
title_fullStr |
First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary |
title_full_unstemmed |
First-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary |
title_sort |
first-year university students’ receptive and productive use of academic vocabulary |
publisher |
Stellenbosch University |
series |
Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics |
issn |
1027-3417 2223-9936 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
<p class="Abstract">The present study explores academic vocabulary knowledge, operationalised through the Academic Word List, among first-year higher education students. Both receptive and productive knowledge and the proportion between the two are examined. Results show that while receptive knowledge is readily acquired by first-year students, productive knowledge lags behind and remains problematic. This entails that receptive knowledge is much larger than productive knowledge, which confirms earlier indications that receptive vocabulary knowledge is larger than productive knowledge for both academic vocabulary (Zhou 2010) and general vocabulary (cf. Laufer 1998, Webb 2008, among others). Furthermore, results reveal that the ratio between receptive and productive knowledge is slightly above 50%, which lends empirical support to previous findings that the ratio between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge can be anywhere between 50% and 80% (Milton 2009). This finding is extended here to academic vocabulary; complementing Zhou’s (2010) study that investigated the relationship between the two aspects of vocabulary knowledge without examining the ratio between them. On the basis of these results, approaches that could potentially contribute to fostering productive knowledge growth are discussed. Avenues worth exploring to gain further insight into the relationship between receptive and productive knowledge are also suggested.</p> |
topic |
academic vocabulary, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, collocations, vocabulary dimensions |
url |
http://spil.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/215 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deogratiasnizonkiza firstyearuniversitystudentsreceptiveandproductiveuseofacademicvocabulary |
_version_ |
1724706459343650816 |