Validation of Instruments for Assessing Drug Safety Management During the Conduction of Clinical Trials

• Main Authors: Yaimarelis Saumell, Olga Torres, Maritza Batista, Lizet Sánchez
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2018-07-01
• Series: International Journal of Health Policy and Management
• Subjects: Validation Studies; Drug Safety Management; Clinical Trial; Cuba
• Online Access: http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3446_28af62624ae370356485b1b0c1b3ec7f.pdf
• ISSN: 2322-5939; 2322-5939

Background The management of drug safety with the collection of reliable safety data during the conduction of clinical trials conduct is essential for the registry and marketing of products. The systematic evaluation of this process, based on objective measures, requires the application of quality instruments. This study was aimed to design and validate eight instruments through the components of quality (structure, process, and results), for characterizing and assessing the process of drug safety management, during the conduction of clinical trials. Methods The eight instruments were designed according to the international recommendations for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and comprise a knowledge survey for professionals at the investigational sites, a satisfaction scale of internal and external clients and a satisfaction survey for patients with the treatment of the adverse events. The instruments also include a checklist to evaluate the safety management infrastructure (human, material and organizational resources) in the sponsoring center, a checklist to evaluate the same criterion at the investigational sites and three checklists that evaluate adherence to regulatory requirements of essential documents (investigator’s brochure, protocol, and informed consent form). The content validity was evaluated by Delphi method and the reliability was determined by Cronbach α test. Results All the items were valued as very adequate after the second round of the expert panel. The instruments were deemed as appropriate and understandable in the pre-test performed. All responders agreed with the options given and the accessibility of the application. Only 10% of professionals at the research sites suggested that the knowledge survey was too long. Cronbach α values between .66 and .93 were obtained. Conclusion The structure, process, and outcome framework allowed for the characterization of drug safety management during clinical trials, providing a useful approach for the promoter to systematically measure and evaluate the process. The eight instruments were deemed as reliable, feasible and easy to be used for examining drug safety management while carrying out clinical trials.