Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict

This article presents an investigation of the forces of authority and co-option surrounding the documentation of violence and specifically sexual violence against women in conflict, and examines the representation of survivors in media and academic sources. The first section focusses on the use of o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alice Fitzsimons-Quail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh Library 2015-04-01
Series:The South Asianist
Online Access:http://www.southasianist.ed.ac.uk/article/view/1173
id doaj-6ced213729f34996b49e109a2fad0af6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ced213729f34996b49e109a2fad0af62021-09-13T09:04:34ZengUniversity of Edinburgh LibraryThe South Asianist2050-487X2015-04-01321173Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflictAlice Fitzsimons-Quail0University of EdinburghThis article presents an investigation of the forces of authority and co-option surrounding the documentation of violence and specifically sexual violence against women in conflict, and examines the representation of survivors in media and academic sources. The first section focusses on the use of oral testimony in the conflicts in East Pakistan/Bangladesh in 1971 and the disintegration of Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and how survivors' narratives are interpreted and communicated. It then goes on to examine the representation of violence against women in the Bangladesh conflict in a variety of South Asian newspaper sources in the years immediately following 1971. This is then further explored in the final section where these media discourses display the co-opting of women's experiences into discourses of nation-building and state legitimacy in Bangladesh. The article concludes that the sources examined reflect a tendency for narratives of sexual violence in conflict to be co-opted or otherwise 'used' for secondary political purposes by the media, the state and even academic researchers, such that the women survivors retain little authority over the communication of their 'history' and its utilisation.http://www.southasianist.ed.ac.uk/article/view/1173
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alice Fitzsimons-Quail
spellingShingle Alice Fitzsimons-Quail
Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
The South Asianist
author_facet Alice Fitzsimons-Quail
author_sort Alice Fitzsimons-Quail
title Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
title_short Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
title_full Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
title_fullStr Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
title_full_unstemmed Who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
title_sort who is speaking? co-option, authority, and envisioning the nation: women and narratives of sexual violence in conflict
publisher University of Edinburgh Library
series The South Asianist
issn 2050-487X
publishDate 2015-04-01
description This article presents an investigation of the forces of authority and co-option surrounding the documentation of violence and specifically sexual violence against women in conflict, and examines the representation of survivors in media and academic sources. The first section focusses on the use of oral testimony in the conflicts in East Pakistan/Bangladesh in 1971 and the disintegration of Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and how survivors' narratives are interpreted and communicated. It then goes on to examine the representation of violence against women in the Bangladesh conflict in a variety of South Asian newspaper sources in the years immediately following 1971. This is then further explored in the final section where these media discourses display the co-opting of women's experiences into discourses of nation-building and state legitimacy in Bangladesh. The article concludes that the sources examined reflect a tendency for narratives of sexual violence in conflict to be co-opted or otherwise 'used' for secondary political purposes by the media, the state and even academic researchers, such that the women survivors retain little authority over the communication of their 'history' and its utilisation.
url http://www.southasianist.ed.ac.uk/article/view/1173
work_keys_str_mv AT alicefitzsimonsquail whoisspeakingcooptionauthorityandenvisioningthenationwomenandnarrativesofsexualviolenceinconflict
_version_ 1717381106655821824