Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adults

Background: A 50-item self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed for French adults, to assess the intake of energy, 10 macronutrients, 11 vitamins, and 11 minerals, and to be used in the context of a medical consultation. Objective: To assess the repeatability and relative va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emmanuel Barrat, Nicolas Aubineau, Matthieu Maillot, Élodie Derbord, Pauline Barthes, Jean-François Lescuyer, Nathalie Boisseau, Sébastien L. Peltier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swedish Nutrition Foundation 2012-10-01
Series:Food & Nutrition Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/18472/24635
id doaj-6cec2e4bb18140a6b72d35e7b0d67f93
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6cec2e4bb18140a6b72d35e7b0d67f932020-11-24T21:06:50ZengSwedish Nutrition FoundationFood & Nutrition Research1654-66281654-661X2012-10-0156011110.3402/fnr.v56i0.18472Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adultsEmmanuel BarratNicolas AubineauMatthieu MaillotÉlodie DerbordPauline BarthesJean-François LescuyerNathalie BoisseauSébastien L. PeltierBackground: A 50-item self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed for French adults, to assess the intake of energy, 10 macronutrients, 11 vitamins, and 11 minerals, and to be used in the context of a medical consultation. Objective: To assess the repeatability and relative validity of this FFQ compared to a 7-day diet record (7-DR). Design: A total of 54 and 100 French adults were included in the repeatability and validation studies, respectively. Repeatability was assessed using two FFQs, the second carried out 3 weeks after the first. In the validation study, subjects first completed the FFQ, then the 7-DR the following week. Energy and nutrient intakes were compared using Pearson correlation. The degree of misclassification by the FFQ, compared to the 7-DR, was calculated by a contingency table of quintiles. Bland–Altman plots assessed the correlation between FFQ and 7-DR across the intake range. Results: Repeatability for intake, explored by Pearson correlation, was 0.62–0.90 (median: 0.81). Relative validity, as determined by Pearson correlation for the nutrient intake derived from the FFQ and 7-DR, was 0.36–0.80 (0.64). The FFQ tended to report higher fiber and micronutrient intake than 7-DR. Misclassification into opposite quintiles ranged 0–6% (1%), whereas classification into same or adjacent quintiles ranged 59–83% (74%). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement for most nutrients across the range of intake. Conclusion: This new FFQ showed a high repeatability and good relative validity, and thanks to its short length, should be a useful tool for rapidly evaluating the nutrient intake of French adults.http://www.foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/18472/24635nutrient intakediet recordrelative validationadultFrance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emmanuel Barrat
Nicolas Aubineau
Matthieu Maillot
Élodie Derbord
Pauline Barthes
Jean-François Lescuyer
Nathalie Boisseau
Sébastien L. Peltier
spellingShingle Emmanuel Barrat
Nicolas Aubineau
Matthieu Maillot
Élodie Derbord
Pauline Barthes
Jean-François Lescuyer
Nathalie Boisseau
Sébastien L. Peltier
Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adults
Food & Nutrition Research
nutrient intake
diet record
relative validation
adult
France
author_facet Emmanuel Barrat
Nicolas Aubineau
Matthieu Maillot
Élodie Derbord
Pauline Barthes
Jean-François Lescuyer
Nathalie Boisseau
Sébastien L. Peltier
author_sort Emmanuel Barrat
title Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adults
title_short Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adults
title_full Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adults
title_fullStr Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adults
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among French adults
title_sort repeatability and relative validity of a quantitative food-frequency questionnaire among french adults
publisher Swedish Nutrition Foundation
series Food & Nutrition Research
issn 1654-6628
1654-661X
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Background: A 50-item self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was developed for French adults, to assess the intake of energy, 10 macronutrients, 11 vitamins, and 11 minerals, and to be used in the context of a medical consultation. Objective: To assess the repeatability and relative validity of this FFQ compared to a 7-day diet record (7-DR). Design: A total of 54 and 100 French adults were included in the repeatability and validation studies, respectively. Repeatability was assessed using two FFQs, the second carried out 3 weeks after the first. In the validation study, subjects first completed the FFQ, then the 7-DR the following week. Energy and nutrient intakes were compared using Pearson correlation. The degree of misclassification by the FFQ, compared to the 7-DR, was calculated by a contingency table of quintiles. Bland–Altman plots assessed the correlation between FFQ and 7-DR across the intake range. Results: Repeatability for intake, explored by Pearson correlation, was 0.62–0.90 (median: 0.81). Relative validity, as determined by Pearson correlation for the nutrient intake derived from the FFQ and 7-DR, was 0.36–0.80 (0.64). The FFQ tended to report higher fiber and micronutrient intake than 7-DR. Misclassification into opposite quintiles ranged 0–6% (1%), whereas classification into same or adjacent quintiles ranged 59–83% (74%). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement for most nutrients across the range of intake. Conclusion: This new FFQ showed a high repeatability and good relative validity, and thanks to its short length, should be a useful tool for rapidly evaluating the nutrient intake of French adults.
topic nutrient intake
diet record
relative validation
adult
France
url http://www.foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/18472/24635
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanuelbarrat repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
AT nicolasaubineau repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
AT matthieumaillot repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
AT x00c9lodiederbord repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
AT paulinebarthes repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
AT jeanfranx00e7oislescuyer repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
AT nathalieboisseau repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
AT sx00e9bastienlpeltier repeatabilityandrelativevalidityofaquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongfrenchadults
_version_ 1716764517560483840