Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity

Massive gravity (mGR) describes a dynamical “metric” on a fiducial, background one. We investigate fluctuations of the dynamics about mGR solutions, that is about its “mean field theory”. Analyzing mean field massive gravity (m‾GR) propagation characteristics is not only equivalent to studying those...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Deser, A. Waldron, G. Zahariade
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-10-01
Series:Physics Letters B
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269315005651
id doaj-6cd9e904831647c08a0dce77e53a1f78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6cd9e904831647c08a0dce77e53a1f782020-11-24T23:01:23ZengElsevierPhysics Letters B0370-26931873-24452015-10-01749C14414810.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.055Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravityS. Deser0A. Waldron1G. Zahariade2Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USADepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USADepartment of Physics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USAMassive gravity (mGR) describes a dynamical “metric” on a fiducial, background one. We investigate fluctuations of the dynamics about mGR solutions, that is about its “mean field theory”. Analyzing mean field massive gravity (m‾GR) propagation characteristics is not only equivalent to studying those of the full non-linear theory, but also in direct correspondence with earlier analyses of charged higher spin systems, the oldest example being the charged, massive spin 3/2 Rarita–Schwinger (RS) theory. The fiducial and mGR mean field background metrics in the m‾GR model correspond to the RS Minkowski metric and external EM field. The common implications in both systems are that hyperbolicity holds only in a weak background-mean-field limit, immediately ruling both theories out as fundamental theories; a situation in stark contrast with general relativity (GR) which is at least a consistent classical theory. Moreover, even though both m‾GR and RS theories can still in principle be considered as predictive effective models in the weak regime, their lower helicities then exhibit superluminal behavior: lower helicity gravitons are superluminal as compared to photons propagating on either the fiducial or background metric. Thus our approach has uncovered a novel, dispersive, “crystal-like” phenomenon of differing helicities having differing propagation speeds. This applies both to m‾GR and mGR, and is a peculiar feature that is also problematic for consistent coupling to matter.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269315005651
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Deser
A. Waldron
G. Zahariade
spellingShingle S. Deser
A. Waldron
G. Zahariade
Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity
Physics Letters B
author_facet S. Deser
A. Waldron
G. Zahariade
author_sort S. Deser
title Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity
title_short Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity
title_full Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity
title_fullStr Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity
title_full_unstemmed Propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity
title_sort propagation peculiarities of mean field massive gravity
publisher Elsevier
series Physics Letters B
issn 0370-2693
1873-2445
publishDate 2015-10-01
description Massive gravity (mGR) describes a dynamical “metric” on a fiducial, background one. We investigate fluctuations of the dynamics about mGR solutions, that is about its “mean field theory”. Analyzing mean field massive gravity (m‾GR) propagation characteristics is not only equivalent to studying those of the full non-linear theory, but also in direct correspondence with earlier analyses of charged higher spin systems, the oldest example being the charged, massive spin 3/2 Rarita–Schwinger (RS) theory. The fiducial and mGR mean field background metrics in the m‾GR model correspond to the RS Minkowski metric and external EM field. The common implications in both systems are that hyperbolicity holds only in a weak background-mean-field limit, immediately ruling both theories out as fundamental theories; a situation in stark contrast with general relativity (GR) which is at least a consistent classical theory. Moreover, even though both m‾GR and RS theories can still in principle be considered as predictive effective models in the weak regime, their lower helicities then exhibit superluminal behavior: lower helicity gravitons are superluminal as compared to photons propagating on either the fiducial or background metric. Thus our approach has uncovered a novel, dispersive, “crystal-like” phenomenon of differing helicities having differing propagation speeds. This applies both to m‾GR and mGR, and is a peculiar feature that is also problematic for consistent coupling to matter.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269315005651
work_keys_str_mv AT sdeser propagationpeculiaritiesofmeanfieldmassivegravity
AT awaldron propagationpeculiaritiesofmeanfieldmassivegravity
AT gzahariade propagationpeculiaritiesofmeanfieldmassivegravity
_version_ 1725639701570781184