Intuitive Direction Concepts

Experiments in this article test the hypothesis that formal direction models used in artificial intelligence correspond to intuitive direction concepts of humans. Cognitively adequate formal models of spatial relations are important for information retrieval tasks, cognitive robotics, and multiple s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Klippel, Jan Oliver Wallgrün, Jinlong Yang, Kevin Sparks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: New Prairie Press 2015-12-01
Series:The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1103&context=biyclc
id doaj-6cd9a5d6ba2e4980aacf4ccfd832fdae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6cd9a5d6ba2e4980aacf4ccfd832fdae2021-06-30T19:33:17ZengNew Prairie PressThe Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication1944-36762015-12-011010.4148/1944-3676.1103Intuitive Direction ConceptsAlexander Klippel 0Jan Oliver Wallgrün1Jinlong Yang2Kevin Sparks 3Pennsylvania State UniversityPennsylvania State UniversitySan Diego State UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityExperiments in this article test the hypothesis that formal direction models used in artificial intelligence correspond to intuitive direction concepts of humans. Cognitively adequate formal models of spatial relations are important for information retrieval tasks, cognitive robotics, and multiple spatial reasoning applications. We detail two experiments using two objects (airplanes) systematically located in relation to each other. Participants performed a grouping task to make their intuitive direction concepts explicit. The results reveal an important, so far insufficiently discussed aspect of cognitive direction concepts: Intuitive (natural) direction concepts do not follow a one-size-fits-all strategy. The behavioral data only forms a clear picture after participants' competing strategies are identified and separated into categories (groups) themselves. The results are important for researchers and designers of spatial formalisms as they demonstrate that modeling cognitive direction concepts formally requires a flexible approach to capture group differences.http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1103&context=biyclcdirection conceptsbehavioral studiesqualitative spatial reasoning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander Klippel
Jan Oliver Wallgrün
Jinlong Yang
Kevin Sparks
spellingShingle Alexander Klippel
Jan Oliver Wallgrün
Jinlong Yang
Kevin Sparks
Intuitive Direction Concepts
The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
direction concepts
behavioral studies
qualitative spatial reasoning
author_facet Alexander Klippel
Jan Oliver Wallgrün
Jinlong Yang
Kevin Sparks
author_sort Alexander Klippel
title Intuitive Direction Concepts
title_short Intuitive Direction Concepts
title_full Intuitive Direction Concepts
title_fullStr Intuitive Direction Concepts
title_full_unstemmed Intuitive Direction Concepts
title_sort intuitive direction concepts
publisher New Prairie Press
series The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
issn 1944-3676
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Experiments in this article test the hypothesis that formal direction models used in artificial intelligence correspond to intuitive direction concepts of humans. Cognitively adequate formal models of spatial relations are important for information retrieval tasks, cognitive robotics, and multiple spatial reasoning applications. We detail two experiments using two objects (airplanes) systematically located in relation to each other. Participants performed a grouping task to make their intuitive direction concepts explicit. The results reveal an important, so far insufficiently discussed aspect of cognitive direction concepts: Intuitive (natural) direction concepts do not follow a one-size-fits-all strategy. The behavioral data only forms a clear picture after participants' competing strategies are identified and separated into categories (groups) themselves. The results are important for researchers and designers of spatial formalisms as they demonstrate that modeling cognitive direction concepts formally requires a flexible approach to capture group differences.
topic direction concepts
behavioral studies
qualitative spatial reasoning
url http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1103&context=biyclc
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderklippel intuitivedirectionconcepts
AT janoliverwallgrun intuitivedirectionconcepts
AT jinlongyang intuitivedirectionconcepts
AT kevinsparks intuitivedirectionconcepts
_version_ 1721352568282546176