Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Future of the Precautionary Principle
The proliferation of bilateral investment treaties and investment chapters in trade megatreaties and the associated increase in the preference of investors for investor-state dispute settlement has given rise to concerns that the regulatory sovereignty of both developed and developing states might b...
Main Author: | Davies Haydn |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2016-12-01
|
Series: | British Journal of American Legal Studies |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0016 |
Similar Items
-
Investment Court System or ‘Regional’ Dispute Settlement?: The Uncertain Future of Investor-state Dispute Settlement
by: Umair Ghori -
Research on the Settlement of International Investment Disputes Especially on the Investor-State Dispute Settlement
by: Chen, Chih Ching, et al.
Published: (2015) -
NEW APPROACHES TO THE REFORM OF INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
by: A. V. Soloveva
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Investor State Dispute Settlement: Institutionalising "Corporate Exceptionality"
by: Pablo Leandro Ciocchini, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
A Comparison between the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Mechanism
by: Chou, Keng-Cheng, et al.
Published: (2016)